Re: XO-1(.75)

2013-07-04 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
- Original Message - From: James Cameron qu...@laptop.org To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com Cc: OLPC Devel devel@lists.laptop.org Sent: Thursday, July 4, 2013 8:44 AM Subject: Re: XO-1(.75) On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 10:02:15PM -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: -

Re: XO-1(.75)

2013-07-04 Thread Jon Nettleton
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 8:19 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 11:03:17PM -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: - Original Message - From: James Cameron qu...@laptop.org To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com Cc: OLPC Devel

Re: XO-1(.75)

2013-07-04 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
This comparison has been done a couple of months ago and is clear that F18/S0.98 taxes the systems considerably. What I found interesting in this unmatched comparison was the inconsistency. They might point to specific stacks in the architecture and/or core OS that may need attention (I

Re: Headphone volume adjustment

2013-07-04 Thread James Cameron
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 01:57:28AM -0400, John Watlington wrote: We have noticed that under Fedora 18 (13.2.0 os10 on XO-4), the headphone volume can't be adjusted to complete silence. I've looked into this, and have a tentative patch. I'd like it reviewed to see if the general direction is

Re: XO-1(.75)

2013-07-04 Thread Daniel Drake
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 2:53 AM, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: No inconsistency here. Most of the activities you see slower were ported to Gtk3. Tam-tam suit, speak, calculate, turtle art, maze, moon, record were not ported scratch and etoys are not related with Gtk Browse received

Re: XO-1(.75)

2013-07-04 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
So, having someone generate activity startup time numbers in a fair test (i.e. same platform, different software versions) would be of value.   Tried the following little script but I can not find a way to get the output of 'time' command to the output.txt file. Any suggestions? #!/bin/bash

Re: XO-1(.75)

2013-07-04 Thread Daniel Drake
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com wrote: Tried the following little script but I can not find a way to get the output of 'time' command to the output.txt file. Not really sure what you are trying to do here - sugar-launch will not return until the

Re: XO-1(.75)

2013-07-04 Thread Daniel Drake
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com wrote: The following script appears to work as expected, but is the result valid? That's hard to judge without having an explanation for what you are trying to measure. I can't immediately see your intentions from reading

Re: XO-1(.75)

2013-07-04 Thread Jerry Vonau
On Thu, 2013-07-04 at 13:57 -0600, Daniel Drake wrote: On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com wrote: Tried the following little script but I can not find a way to get the output of 'time' command to the output.txt file. Not really sure what you are

Re: XO-1(.75)

2013-07-04 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
While more manual, you can get the activity startup time uncommenting the line export SUGAR_LOGGER_LEVEL=debug in the file .sugar/debug Gonzalo On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.comwrote: So, having someone generate activity startup time numbers in a

Re: XO-1(.75)

2013-07-04 Thread Yioryos Asprobounitis
The following script appears to work as expected, but is the result valid? That's hard to judge without having an explanation for what you are trying to measure. I can't immediately see your intentions from reading the script. Daniel My intention is to get a list of the user and

Re: XO-1(.75)

2013-07-04 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
I did another comparison, between 13.2.0 os11 and os883 (sugar 0.94) You can see the results here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0As_jQJX0Me6XdDI2clFpX1FFRHhKMHVFZGkyakdST2cusp=sharing Metodology: * Changed SUGAR_LOGGER_DEVEL * The activities were started from the listview, then

Re: XO-1(.75)

2013-07-04 Thread Daniel Drake
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Jerry Vonau jvo...@shaw.ca wrote: Of the total available, would that not be a 100% increase in CPU time used by the process running X? What do you mean by the process running X? The parent process of the X process? Daniel

Re: XO-1(.75)

2013-07-04 Thread James Cameron
On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 01:00:09PM -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: So, having someone generate activity startup time numbers in a fair test (i.e. same platform, different software versions) would be of value. OK. The following script appears to work as expected, but is the result

Re: XO-1(.75)

2013-07-04 Thread James Cameron
On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 07:16:11PM -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: I did another comparison, between  13.2.0 os11 and os883 (sugar 0.94) You can see the results here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key= 0As_jQJX0Me6XdDI2clFpX1FFRHhKMHVFZGkyakdST2cusp=sharing Good data, thanks.

Re: XO-1(.75)

2013-07-04 Thread Hal Murray
qu...@laptop.org said: A better measurement to look for is the elapsed time of activity startup. This is a most interesting value, but it is difficult to obtain without changing the activity source so that the point of startup completion is identified. (That task is made more difficult since

Re: XO-1(.75)

2013-07-04 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 9:55 PM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 07:16:11PM -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: I did another comparison, between 13.2.0 os11 and os883 (sugar 0.94) You can see the results here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=