Yo folks
While I generally find the new build methodology (i.e., reducing the
number of makefiles) has little impact on me, I have now encountered
one problem that causes a significant difficulty. In trying to work
on a revised data packing system for the orte part of the branch, I
now find t
Hi Ralph,
* Ralph H. Castain wrote on Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 03:12:38PM CET:
>
> While I generally find the new build methodology (i.e., reducing the
> number of makefiles) has little impact on me, I have now encountered
> one problem that causes a significant difficulty. In trying to work
> on
Your proposed change would help a great deal - thanks! Can you steer
me through the change?
At 07:33 AM 11/15/2005, you wrote:
Hi Ralph,
* Ralph H. Castain wrote on Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 03:12:38PM CET:
>
> While I generally find the new build methodology (i.e., reducing the
> number of makefil
* Ralph H. Castain wrote on Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 03:45:26PM CET:
> At 07:33 AM 11/15/2005, you wrote:
> >
> >Would it help if only the change not to build a convenience archive in
> >orte/dps would be reverted? You could then
> > cd orte
> > make dps/libdps.la
> >
> >and would only have to iss
