Re: [OMPI devel] [EXTERNAL] 1.7.x support statement

[Ralph Castain]

Done

On Oct 7, 2013, at 9:29 AM, "Barrett, Brian W"  wrote:

> Yes; Jeff was saying that it was currently listed as supported and we
> probably should move it to lightly tested (and I was agreeing, although
> without typing much).
> 
> Brian
> 
> On 10/6/13 10:35 PM, "Ralph Castain"  wrote:
> 
>> I guess I don't understand your example - shouldn't all the Solaris
>> support be in the lightly tested category? I see only the 32-bit Solaris
>> entry, with everything else still shown in the "full" category
>> 
>> 
>> On Oct 6, 2013, at 7:22 PM, "Barrett, Brian W"  wrote:
>> 
>>> I agree with the Solaris move.
>>> 
>>> Brian
>>> 
>>> On 10/4/13 5:08 AM, "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
 This is in the README -- is it still accurate?  I'm thinking that all
 Solaris support should move to the "lightly but not fully tested"
 category, for example:
 
 -
 - Systems that have been tested are:
 
 - Linux (various flavors/distros), 32 bit, with gcc
 
 - Linux (various flavors/distros), 64 bit (x86), with gcc, Absoft,
 
  Intel, Portland, and Oracle Solaris Studio 12.3 compilers (*)
 
 - OS X (10.5, 10.6, 10.7), 32 and 64 bit (x86_64), with gcc and
 
  Absoft compilers (*)
 
 - Oracle Solaris 10 and 11, 64 bit (SPARC, i386, x86_64),
 
  with Oracle Solaris Studio 12.2 and 12.3
 
 
 
 (*) Be sure to read the Compiler Notes, below.
 
 
 
 - Other systems have been lightly (but not fully tested):
 
 - Other 64 bit platforms (e.g., Linux on PPC64)
 
 - 32-bit Solaris
 
 -
 
 -- 
 Jeff Squyres
 jsquy...@cisco.com
 For corporate legal information go to:
 http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
 
 ___
 devel mailing list
 de...@open-mpi.org
 http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Brian W. Barrett
>>> Scalable System Software Group
>>> Sandia National Laboratories
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> devel mailing list
>>> de...@open-mpi.org
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>> 
>> ___
>> devel mailing list
>> de...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>> 
> 
> 
> --
>  Brian W. Barrett
>  Scalable System Software Group
>  Sandia National Laboratories
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel

Re: [OMPI devel] [EXTERNAL] 1.7.x support statement

[Barrett, Brian W]

Yes; Jeff was saying that it was currently listed as supported and we
probably should move it to lightly tested (and I was agreeing, although
without typing much).

Brian

On 10/6/13 10:35 PM, "Ralph Castain"  wrote:

>I guess I don't understand your example - shouldn't all the Solaris
>support be in the lightly tested category? I see only the 32-bit Solaris
>entry, with everything else still shown in the "full" category
>
>
>On Oct 6, 2013, at 7:22 PM, "Barrett, Brian W"  wrote:
>
>> I agree with the Solaris move.
>> 
>> Brian
>> 
>> On 10/4/13 5:08 AM, "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" 
>>wrote:
>> 
>>> This is in the README -- is it still accurate?  I'm thinking that all
>>> Solaris support should move to the "lightly but not fully tested"
>>> category, for example:
>>> 
>>> -
>>> - Systems that have been tested are:
>>> 
>>> - Linux (various flavors/distros), 32 bit, with gcc
>>> 
>>> - Linux (various flavors/distros), 64 bit (x86), with gcc, Absoft,
>>> 
>>>   Intel, Portland, and Oracle Solaris Studio 12.3 compilers (*)
>>> 
>>> - OS X (10.5, 10.6, 10.7), 32 and 64 bit (x86_64), with gcc and
>>> 
>>>   Absoft compilers (*)
>>> 
>>> - Oracle Solaris 10 and 11, 64 bit (SPARC, i386, x86_64),
>>> 
>>>   with Oracle Solaris Studio 12.2 and 12.3
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> (*) Be sure to read the Compiler Notes, below.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> - Other systems have been lightly (but not fully tested):
>>> 
>>> - Other 64 bit platforms (e.g., Linux on PPC64)
>>> 
>>> - 32-bit Solaris
>>> 
>>> -
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Jeff Squyres
>>> jsquy...@cisco.com
>>> For corporate legal information go to:
>>> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> devel mailing list
>>> de...@open-mpi.org
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>>  Brian W. Barrett
>>  Scalable System Software Group
>>  Sandia National Laboratories
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> devel mailing list
>> de...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>
>___
>devel mailing list
>de...@open-mpi.org
>http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>


--
  Brian W. Barrett
  Scalable System Software Group
  Sandia National Laboratories





smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [OMPI devel] [EXTERNAL] 1.7.x support statement

[Ralph Castain]

I guess I don't understand your example - shouldn't all the Solaris support be 
in the lightly tested category? I see only the 32-bit Solaris entry, with 
everything else still shown in the "full" category


On Oct 6, 2013, at 7:22 PM, "Barrett, Brian W"  wrote:

> I agree with the Solaris move.
> 
> Brian
> 
> On 10/4/13 5:08 AM, "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)"  wrote:
> 
>> This is in the README -- is it still accurate?  I'm thinking that all
>> Solaris support should move to the "lightly but not fully tested"
>> category, for example:
>> 
>> -
>> - Systems that have been tested are:
>> 
>> - Linux (various flavors/distros), 32 bit, with gcc
>> 
>> - Linux (various flavors/distros), 64 bit (x86), with gcc, Absoft,
>> 
>>   Intel, Portland, and Oracle Solaris Studio 12.3 compilers (*)
>> 
>> - OS X (10.5, 10.6, 10.7), 32 and 64 bit (x86_64), with gcc and
>> 
>>   Absoft compilers (*)
>> 
>> - Oracle Solaris 10 and 11, 64 bit (SPARC, i386, x86_64),
>> 
>>   with Oracle Solaris Studio 12.2 and 12.3
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> (*) Be sure to read the Compiler Notes, below.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> - Other systems have been lightly (but not fully tested):
>> 
>> - Other 64 bit platforms (e.g., Linux on PPC64)
>> 
>> - 32-bit Solaris
>> 
>> -
>> 
>> -- 
>> Jeff Squyres
>> jsquy...@cisco.com
>> For corporate legal information go to:
>> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
>> 
>> ___
>> devel mailing list
>> de...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>> 
> 
> 
> --
>  Brian W. Barrett
>  Scalable System Software Group
>  Sandia National Laboratories
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel

Re: [OMPI devel] [EXTERNAL] 1.7.x support statement

[Barrett, Brian W]

I agree with the Solaris move.

Brian

On 10/4/13 5:08 AM, "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)"  wrote:

>This is in the README -- is it still accurate?  I'm thinking that all
>Solaris support should move to the "lightly but not fully tested"
>category, for example:
>
>-
>- Systems that have been tested are:
>  
>  - Linux (various flavors/distros), 32 bit, with gcc
>  
>  - Linux (various flavors/distros), 64 bit (x86), with gcc, Absoft,
>  
>Intel, Portland, and Oracle Solaris Studio 12.3 compilers (*)
>  
>  - OS X (10.5, 10.6, 10.7), 32 and 64 bit (x86_64), with gcc and
>  
>Absoft compilers (*)
>  
>  - Oracle Solaris 10 and 11, 64 bit (SPARC, i386, x86_64),
>  
>with Oracle Solaris Studio 12.2 and 12.3
>  
>  
>  
>  (*) Be sure to read the Compiler Notes, below.
>  
>  
>  
>- Other systems have been lightly (but not fully tested):
>  
>  - Other 64 bit platforms (e.g., Linux on PPC64)
>  
>  - 32-bit Solaris
>  
>-
>
>-- 
>Jeff Squyres
>jsquy...@cisco.com
>For corporate legal information go to:
>http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
>
>___
>devel mailing list
>de...@open-mpi.org
>http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>


--
  Brian W. Barrett
  Scalable System Software Group
  Sandia National Laboratories