Oob/tcp should likely be good enough.
Do you want to force the two and see if there's noticeable difference for you?
mpirun --mca oob tcp ...
mpirun --mca oob ud ...
> On Jun 19, 2018, at 6:14 PM, Ben Menadue wrote:
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
> What’s the replacement that it should use instead? I’m pretty sure oob/ud is
> being picked by default on our IB cluster. Or is oob/tcp good enough?
>
> Cheers,
> Ben
>
>> On 20 Jun 2018, at 5:20 am, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) via devel
>> wrote:
>>
>> We talked about this on the webex today, but for those of you who weren't
>> there: we're talking about removing the oob/ud component:
>>
>> https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/pull/5300
>>
>> We couldn't find anyone who still cares about this component (e.g., LANL,
>> Mellanox, ...etc.), and no one is maintaining it. If no one says anything
>> within the next 2 weeks, we'll remove oob/ud before the branch for v4.0.0.
>>
>> --
>> Jeff Squyres
>> jsquy...@cisco.com
>>
>> ___
>> devel mailing list
>> devel@lists.open-mpi.org
>> https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
> ___
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.open-mpi.org
> https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
___
devel mailing list
devel@lists.open-mpi.org
https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/devel