Re: [OMPI devel] errno and reentrance

2014-10-27 Thread Gilles Gouaillardet
Thanks Paul,

so the simplest way is to force -D_REENTRANT on Solaris, i will do that !

Cheers,

Gilles

On 2014/10/27 19:36, Paul Hargrove wrote:
> Gilles,
>
> I responded too quickly, not thinking that this test is pretty quick and
> doesn't require that I try sparc, ppc, ia64, etc.
> So my results:
>
> Solaris-{10,11}:
>   With "cc" I agree with your findings (need -D_REENTRANT for correct
> behavior).
>   With gcc either "-pthread" or "-D_REENTRANT" gave correct behavior
>
> NetBSD-5:
>   Got "KO: error 4 (0)" no matter what I tried
>
> Linux,  FreeBSD-{9,10}, NetBSD-6, OpenBSD-5:
>   Using "-pthread" or "-lpthread" was necessary to link, and sufficient for
> correct results.
>
> MacOSX-10.{5,6,7,8}:
>   No compiler options were required for 'cc' (which has been gcc, llvm-gcc
> and clang through those OS revs)
>
> Though I have access, I did not try compute nodes on BG/Q or Cray X{E,K,C}.
> Let me know if any of those are of significant concern.
>
> I no longer have AIX or IRIX access.
>
> -Paul
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet <
> gilles.gouaillar...@iferc.org> wrote:
>
>>  Thanks Paul !
>>
>> Gilles
>>
>> On 2014/10/27 18:47, Paul Hargrove wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 2:42 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet 
>>  wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>>
>>  Paul, since you have access to many platforms, could you please run this
>> test with and without -D_REENTRANT / -D_THREAD_SAFE
>> and tell me where the program produces incorrect behaviour (output is
>> KO...) without the flag ?
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> Gilles
>>
>>
>>  Gilles,
>>
>> I have a lot of things due between now and the SC14 conference.
>> I've added this test to my to-do list, but cannot be sure of how soon I'll
>> be able to get results back to you.
>>
>> Feel free to remind me off-list,
>> -Paul
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> devel mailing listde...@open-mpi.org
>> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>> Link to this post: 
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/10/16095.php
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> devel mailing list
>> de...@open-mpi.org
>> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>> Link to this post:
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/10/16096.php
>>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> Link to this post: 
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/10/16097.php



Re: [OMPI devel] errno and reentrance

2014-10-27 Thread Paul Hargrove
Gilles,

I responded too quickly, not thinking that this test is pretty quick and
doesn't require that I try sparc, ppc, ia64, etc.
So my results:

Solaris-{10,11}:
  With "cc" I agree with your findings (need -D_REENTRANT for correct
behavior).
  With gcc either "-pthread" or "-D_REENTRANT" gave correct behavior

NetBSD-5:
  Got "KO: error 4 (0)" no matter what I tried

Linux,  FreeBSD-{9,10}, NetBSD-6, OpenBSD-5:
  Using "-pthread" or "-lpthread" was necessary to link, and sufficient for
correct results.

MacOSX-10.{5,6,7,8}:
  No compiler options were required for 'cc' (which has been gcc, llvm-gcc
and clang through those OS revs)

Though I have access, I did not try compute nodes on BG/Q or Cray X{E,K,C}.
Let me know if any of those are of significant concern.

I no longer have AIX or IRIX access.

-Paul


On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet <
gilles.gouaillar...@iferc.org> wrote:

>  Thanks Paul !
>
> Gilles
>
> On 2014/10/27 18:47, Paul Hargrove wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 2:42 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet 
>  wrote:
> [...]
>
>
>  Paul, since you have access to many platforms, could you please run this
> test with and without -D_REENTRANT / -D_THREAD_SAFE
> and tell me where the program produces incorrect behaviour (output is
> KO...) without the flag ?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Gilles
>
>
>  Gilles,
>
> I have a lot of things due between now and the SC14 conference.
> I've added this test to my to-do list, but cannot be sure of how soon I'll
> be able to get results back to you.
>
> Feel free to remind me off-list,
> -Paul
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> devel mailing listde...@open-mpi.org
> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> Link to this post: 
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/10/16095.php
>
>
>
> ___
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> Link to this post:
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/10/16096.php
>



-- 
Paul H. Hargrove  phhargr...@lbl.gov
Future Technologies Group
Computer and Data Sciences Department Tel: +1-510-495-2352
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Fax: +1-510-486-6900


Re: [OMPI devel] errno and reentrance

2014-10-27 Thread Gilles Gouaillardet
Thanks Paul !

Gilles

On 2014/10/27 18:47, Paul Hargrove wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 2:42 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet <
> gilles.gouaillar...@iferc.org> wrote:
> [...]
>
>> Paul, since you have access to many platforms, could you please run this
>> test with and without -D_REENTRANT / -D_THREAD_SAFE
>> and tell me where the program produces incorrect behaviour (output is
>> KO...) without the flag ?
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> Gilles
>>
> Gilles,
>
> I have a lot of things due between now and the SC14 conference.
> I've added this test to my to-do list, but cannot be sure of how soon I'll
> be able to get results back to you.
>
> Feel free to remind me off-list,
> -Paul
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> Link to this post: 
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/10/16095.php



Re: [OMPI devel] errno and reentrance

2014-10-27 Thread Paul Hargrove
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 2:42 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet <
gilles.gouaillar...@iferc.org> wrote:
[...]

> Paul, since you have access to many platforms, could you please run this
> test with and without -D_REENTRANT / -D_THREAD_SAFE
> and tell me where the program produces incorrect behaviour (output is
> KO...) without the flag ?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Gilles
>

Gilles,

I have a lot of things due between now and the SC14 conference.
I've added this test to my to-do list, but cannot be sure of how soon I'll
be able to get results back to you.

Feel free to remind me off-list,
-Paul



-- 
Paul H. Hargrove  phhargr...@lbl.gov
Future Technologies Group
Computer and Data Sciences Department Tel: +1-510-495-2352
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Fax: +1-510-486-6900