Re: Did your fix for minpoll=0 work?

2016-09-21 Thread Gary E. Miller
Yo Hal! On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 10:48:04 -0700 Hal Murray wrote: > I worked out a (much) more complicated fix. I'll happily dump it if > yours works. I have nothing yet. Just a start of a patch, pushed a tiny bit last night. > When I was testing things, ntpq showd a

Did your fix for minpoll=0 work?

2016-09-21 Thread Hal Murray
I worked out a (much) more complicated fix. I'll happily dump it if yours works. When I was testing things, ntpq showd a poll of 1, but clockstats was acting like it was 2. So there are 2 options for what "works" means. -- These are my opinions. I hate spam.

Re: ✘minpoll=maxpoll from 1 to 7

2016-09-21 Thread Gary E. Miller
Yo All! New data for poll=7 (128 Sec). Like before, all data is 90% bounds, run over 24 hours or more. poll=8 up next. Xeon: Local Clock Local Clock Local ClockPPS PPS Poll Freq Offset 90% Jitter 90% Stability 90% Offset 90% Jitter 90% 1 495ppb

Re: minpoll=maxpoll from 1 to 7

2016-09-21 Thread Gary E. Miller
Yo Hal! On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 19:24:31 -0700 Hal Murray wrote: > Nice work. Thanks. I wish it brought more clarity... > Would you please remind us about what the PPS setups on those systems > are. (I think you said the Xeon has a USB setup.)