- Original Message -
> From: "Nir Soffer"
> To: "Francesco Romani"
> Cc: "engine-de...@ovirt.org"
> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 9:35:30 PM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] [VDSM] [JSONRPC] early, coarse grained benchmarks
[...]
> > I'm profiling four major flows at the moment, and impr
- Original Message -
> From: "Francesco Romani"
> To: "engine-de...@ovirt.org"
> Cc: "Nir Soffer"
> Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 11:47:40 AM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] [VDSM] [JSONRPC] early, coarse grained benchmarks
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Nir Soffer"
> > To:
Hi
Please note that I have added a common function to ease handling of
configuration settings:
signature : fn_db_add_config_value_for_versions_up_to(v_option_name, v_val ,
v_version )
so, for example, if you want to add a new feature F1 flag, which is true only
for 3.6, to _config.sql i
- Original Message -
> From: "Eli Mesika"
> To: "engine-de...@ovirt.org"
> Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 12:42:29 PM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] [db] add config key with same value to multiple
> versions
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Eli Mesika"
> > To: "eng
- Original Message -
> From: "Eli Mesika"
> To: "engine-de...@ovirt.org"
> Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 12:40:53 PM
> Subject: [ovirt-devel] [db] add config key with same value to multiple
> versions
>
> Hi
>
> Please note that I have added a common function to ease handlin
On 17/11/14 08:41, Itamar Heim wrote:
>
> 1) Is this still an issue?
Yes of course, or is it implemented yet?
> 2) Can we afford to dilute the focus we have as it is hard enough to
>stabilize the currently supported distro's? is it worth the
>potential impact?
In general: Software which
Hi,
I just merged [1], which causes *ListModels to be managed by GIN. What does
this mean for you? Well if you are creating a new ListModel you should also
have them managed by GIN as the CommonModel no longer manages them. If you
have any problems with this let me know I will walk you through
Il 17/11/2014 14:22, Sven Kieske ha scritto:
>
>
> On 17/11/14 08:41, Itamar Heim wrote:
>>
>> 1) Is this still an issue?
> Yes of course, or is it implemented yet?
>
>> 2) Can we afford to dilute the focus we have as it is hard enough to
>>stabilize the currently supported distro's? is it w
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 08:24:40AM -0500, Ondřej Svoboda wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am in favor of tagging e.g. the commit introducing the hook in question [1]
> with v4.16.99.
> (Similarly, in the message to ovirt-users [2] I suggested that anyone
> interested in the hook tag their master branch with "
