Hi,
On Fri, 20 Nov 2015, Hauke Petersen wrote:
> 3) Robustness: please be honest, is RIOT robust and mature enough for a
> large scale
> use? Do you know of commercial products that integrates it?
>
at least there are some companies who explicitly note selling their
hw with
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 01:13:50AM +0100, Hauke Petersen wrote:
> On 19.11.2015 20:09, Patrick Rota - Swissponic Sagl wrote:
> >4) License: RIOT is published with a LGPLv2 license and if we understand
> >well, we can then use it in our product without any limitation. Is this
> >right?
> 'Without
Dear Matthias,
thanks for the links, I will check them out. Nice to hear that some
already sell RIOT-powered devices.
Regards,
Patrick
On 11/20/2015 12:50 PM, Matthias Waehlisch wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 20 Nov 2015, Hauke Petersen wrote:
3) Robustness: please be honest, is RIOT robust
Patrick,
Note: I believe you sent this to me privately and I am responding
publicly since I think it is good information.
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:31:32PM +0100, Patrick Rota - Swissponic Sagl wrote:
> b) Distributing source code of RIOT: no problem. Distributing our source
> code: I have
Note: I repost my entire answer to Andrew to the list. By mistake,
before I sent it just to him.
---
Dear Andrew,
thank you for your clarification. I admit that we are not really
competent in the legal side of open source.
I just read the LGPLv2 to understand the issue better.
Regarding
Thank you Andrew for the good information and suggestion.
I will checkout the links you mentioned.
Kind regards,
Patrick
On 11/20/2015 10:58 PM, Andrew Ruder wrote:
Patrick,
Note: I believe you sent this to me privately and I am responding
publicly since I think it is good information.
On
