The way I envision it is as a starting point for RIOT, a base. Once the project
is integrated, then we can make changes to it as we see fit. Is that an
accurate picture or is it more a case of utilizing the project and handling
changes to that project that affect RIOT as they occur on Wakaama independently
through patches? Perhaps some combination of those?
> On Mar 23, 2015, at 4:33 PM, Hauke Petersen
> wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> when using Wakaama (which is certainly an option), the way would be to
> include it in RIOT as a package and include some Makefiles that are able to
> download/checkout the library and build it into RIOT. When choosing this
> path, one important thing is to think of a concept for continuous
> integration, so that the Makefiles and patches can be adjusted to changes of
> the Wakaama implementation in an easy way.
>
> Cheers,
> Hauke
>
>
>> On 23.03.2015 19:45, David Reinert wrote:
>> I am almost certainly planning on using the Wakaama project(formerly
>> liblwM2M) for this project. A possibly silly question but, would a final
>> port of this implementation look similar to the various ports under
>> RIOT/pkg/ or is it more involved than that? I am just trying to get a
>> picture of what the final project would look like so I can better form a
>> clear timeline. Thanks!
>>
>> -David
>>
>>
>> ___
>> devel mailing list
>> devel@riot-os.org
>> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
> ___
> devel mailing list
> devel@riot-os.org
> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
