Added implementations for sig2str() and str2sig() in libc/signal in order
to improve POSIX compliance. Added function prototypes added to
sys/signal.h.
---
newlib/libc/include/sys/signal.h | 12 ++
newlib/libc/signal/sig2str.c | 235 +++
2 files changed, 247
Fixed newline error at end of psxsignal09.yml. Added psxsignal09 in
psxtests and compile only test in psxhdrs in order to evaluate newly
added POSIX standard methods in Newlib.
---
spec/build/testsuites/psxtests/grp.yml| 2 +
spec/build/testsuites/psxtests/libpsxhdrs.yml | 1 +
Added psxsignal09 in psxtests and compile only test in psxhdrs in order to
evaluate
newly added POSIX standard methods in Newlib.
---
spec/build/testsuites/psxtests/grp.yml| 2 +
spec/build/testsuites/psxtests/libpsxhdrs.yml | 1 +
.../build/testsuites/psxtests/psxsignal09.yml | 20
When the MII bus is unterminated on unused interfaces, it results in PHY
read timeouts which manifest as spurious PHYs during the attach call.
Detect these timeouts during the probe so the device can be ignored.
---
freebsd/sys/dev/cadence/if_cgem.c | 18 ++
1 file changed, 18
Now that the issue with false PHY detection on unterminated MII busses
has been resolved, present all hardware interfaces for use on ZynqMP.
---
rtemsbsd/include/bsp/nexus-devices.h | 9 -
testsuite/include/rtems/bsd/test/network-config.h.in | 8
waf_libbsd.py
On 7/9/2021 00:32, Chris Johns wrote:
On 9/7/21 3:28 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 09/07/2021 03:14, Kinsey Moore wrote:
PHY read timeouts return 0x and bypass the current bad/no PHY
checks. This adds a check specifically for that read timeout to avoid
probing PHYs that don't exist.
On 9/7/21 3:39 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 08/07/2021 03:11, Kinsey Moore wrote:
>> I wonder why this never came up with Zynq or QorIQ. Maybe no one wanted to
>> run
>> network tests on the alternate interfaces because dev boards with those
>> interfaces configured didn't exist? It's possible
ping. (Apart from moving the files in a shared directory, a part of this
patch also gets the RTEMS master branch to work on all the Pi's except 4.)
On Fri, 2 Jul 2021, 09:35 Pranav Dangi, wrote:
> yes, I've built all of them
>
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 10:01 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
>> Did you
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 3:11 AM Shiro wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I’m new to RTEMS but very much like its features. I’m wonder what HW
> (MCU/MPU and memory size) RTEMS is typical used on. Anyone care to share a
> bit of details?
>
Well I held back hoping more people on the using side would answer.
On 2/7/21 4:40 am, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
> I'm planning to do a throughput analysis on the RTEMS network stacks
> and I'm looking for some suggestions on the tools/applications for
> that if anyone has done something like that before.
This is a great project.
> If such application has not
On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 8:25 PM Chris Johns wrote:
>
> On 2/7/21 4:40 am, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
> > I'm planning to do a throughput analysis on the RTEMS network stacks
> > and I'm looking for some suggestions on the tools/applications for
> > that if anyone has done something like that
Hello everyone,
I added the functionality for my script to ignore certain directories like
/bsps/, /testsuites/, '/cpukit/zlib', '/cpukit/mghttpd'.
https://github.com/Idadelveloper/rtems/blob/master/hooks/pre-commit
Are there any extra directories I should exclude?
Also open to more suggestions
12 matches
Mail list logo
