On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 10:44 AM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 9:56 AM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>
>> Should we set the cstd version at the top-level?
>
>
> That's not what was done for C++ when I looked for examples. I suppose this
> lets the C++ version vary by tool or
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 9:56 AM Gedare Bloom wrote:
> Should we set the cstd version at the top-level?
>
That's not what was done for C++ when I looked for examples. I suppose this
lets the C++ version vary by tool or library. And we did import some
third-party
code.
--joel
>
> On Tue, Mar
Should we set the cstd version at the top-level?
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 3:16 PM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
> CentOS 7 has gcc 4.8 which defaults to C90 and this results in warnings
> for code that is valid C99 but not C90.
> ---
> misc/wscript | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1
CentOS 7 has gcc 4.8 which defaults to C90 and this results in warnings
for code that is valid C99 but not C90.
---
misc/wscript | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/misc/wscript b/misc/wscript
index 521eddf..21e7f75 100644
--- a/misc/wscript
+++ b/misc/wscript
@@