[developer] Re: [openzfs/openzfs] 8727 Native data and metadata encryption for zfs (#489)

2018-05-24 Thread Jorgen Lundman
Ah, so that is the last outstanding issue? Do you want anything squashed? Squashed-to-some, or Squashed-to-one ? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/489#issuecomment-39190

[developer] Re: [openzfs/openzfs] 8727 Native data and metadata encryption for zfs (#489)

2018-05-24 Thread Matthew Ahrens
The above problem (*.37) was determined to be a mismerge between @GernotS's version of illumos and the code in this repo. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/489#issuecomme

Re: [developer] Sequential scan changes

2018-05-24 Thread Alexander Motin via openzfs-developer
On 24.05.2018 17:25, Igor Kozhukhov wrote: >> On May 25, 2018, at 12:22 AM, Alexander Motin wrote: >> >> ZFS in FreeBSD HEAD now approximately matches illumos from about >> mid-March. I haven't looked what came in to illumos after that, but at >> least we have already merged such invasive recent

Re: [developer] Sequential scan changes

2018-05-24 Thread Prakash Surya
​Sean, Feel free to open a GitHub pull request against the OpenZFS project ( https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs) after getting it ported (even if it doesn't build). There's some automation that'll build the PR and report errors. While the turnaround time for using that to get the change building

Re: [developer] Sequential scan changes

2018-05-24 Thread Igor Kozhukhov
> On May 25, 2018, at 12:22 AM, Alexander Motin wrote: > > ZFS in FreeBSD HEAD now approximately matches illumos from about > mid-March. I haven't looked what came in to illumos after that, but at > least we have already merged such invasive recent patches as device > removal and pool checkpoint

Re: [developer] Sequential scan changes

2018-05-24 Thread Alexander Motin via openzfs-developer
ZFS in FreeBSD HEAD now approximately matches illumos from about mid-March. I haven't looked what came in to illumos after that, but at least we have already merged such invasive recent patches as device removal and pool checkpoints. So my hope was that we may be close enough to apply this withou

Re: [developer] Sequential scan changes

2018-05-24 Thread Sean Fagan
On May 24, 2018, at 2:01 PM, Igor Kozhukhov wrote: > > I’m interested in changes on DilOS and i’d like to test it. > we have setup in lab about 1PB where we can try to test performanse. > > dilos-illumos tree contain a similar illumos build env - more applicable in > zfs code and differences in

Re: [developer] Sequential scan changes

2018-05-24 Thread Igor Kozhukhov
I’m interested in changes on DilOS and i’d like to test it. we have setup in lab about 1PB where we can try to test performanse. dilos-illumos tree contain a similar illumos build env - more applicable in zfs code and differences in others places. where and how i can try to start take a look it?

[developer] Sequential scan changes

2018-05-24 Thread sef
We ported the sequential scan changes from ZFS On Linux (over at  https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/commit/d4a72f23863382bdf6d0ae33196f5b5decbc48fd) to FreeNAS last year; I just submitted the diffs for FreeBSD-HEAD for review over there (over at https://reviews.freebsd.org/D15562). I don't have