Re: [ClusterLabs Developers] [RFC] Time to migrate authoritative source forge elsewhere?

2018-06-07 Thread Digimer
On 2018-06-07 06:21 PM, Jan Pokorný wrote: > On 07/06/18 15:40 -0500, Ken Gaillot wrote: >> On Thu, 2018-06-07 at 11:01 -0400, Digimer wrote: >>> I think we need to hang tight and wait to see what the landscape >>> looks like after the dust settles. There are a lot of people on >>> different

Re: [ClusterLabs Developers] [RFC] Time to migrate authoritative source forge elsewhere?

2018-06-07 Thread Jan Pokorný
On 07/06/18 15:40 -0500, Ken Gaillot wrote: > On Thu, 2018-06-07 at 11:01 -0400, Digimer wrote: >> I think we need to hang tight and wait to see what the landscape >> looks like after the dust settles. There are a lot of people on >> different projects under the Clusterlabs group. To have them all

Re: [ClusterLabs Developers] [RFC] Time to migrate authoritative source forge elsewhere?

2018-06-07 Thread Jan Pokorný
On 04/06/18 09:23 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote: > As a second step, it might also be wise to start offering release > tarballs elsewhere, preferrably OpenPGP-signed proper releases > (as in "make dist" or the like) -- then it can be served practically > from whatever location without imminent risk of

Re: [ClusterLabs Developers] [RFC] Time to migrate authoritative source forge elsewhere?

2018-06-07 Thread Ken Gaillot
On Thu, 2018-06-07 at 11:01 -0400, Digimer wrote: > On 2018-06-07 02:48 AM, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote: > > Jan Pokorný writes: > > > > > > > > But with the latest headlines on where that site is likely > > > headed, > > > I think it's a great opportunity for us to possibly jump on the > > >

Re: [ClusterLabs Developers] [RFC] Time to migrate authoritative source forge elsewhere?

2018-06-07 Thread Kristoffer Grönlund
Adam Spiers writes: > Kristoffer Gronlund wrote: >>>On 07/06/18 08:48 +0200, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote: Jan Pokorný writes: >>So GitLab has a problem that AFAIK even GitHub didn't have, where >>certain crucial features are only in the enterprise edition - > > You're portraying GitLab

Re: [ClusterLabs Developers] [RFC] Time to migrate authoritative source forge elsewhere?

2018-06-07 Thread Adam Spiers
Kristoffer Gronlund wrote: On 07/06/18 08:48 +0200, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote: Jan Pokorný writes: So GitLab has a problem that AFAIK even GitHub didn't have, where certain crucial features are only in the enterprise edition - You're portraying GitLab as worse than GitHub here, but your

Re: [ClusterLabs Developers] [RFC] Time to migrate authoritative source forge elsewhere?

2018-06-07 Thread Kristoffer Grönlund
Jan Pokorný writes: > On 07/06/18 08:48 +0200, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote: >> Jan Pokorný writes: >>> But with the latest headlines on where that site is likely headed, >>> I think it's a great opportunity for us to possibly jump on the >>> bandwagon inclined more towards free (as in freedom)

Re: [ClusterLabs Developers] [RFC] Time to migrate authoritative source forge elsewhere?

2018-06-07 Thread Jan Pokorný
On 07/06/18 08:48 +0200, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote: > Jan Pokorný writes: >> But with the latest headlines on where that site is likely headed, >> I think it's a great opportunity for us to possibly jump on the >> bandwagon inclined more towards free (as in freedom) software >> principles. >> >>

Re: [ClusterLabs Developers] [RFC] Time to migrate authoritative source forge elsewhere?

2018-06-07 Thread Kristoffer Grönlund
Jan Pokorný writes: > > But with the latest headlines on where that site is likely headed, > I think it's a great opportunity for us to possibly jump on the > bandwagon inclined more towards free (as in freedom) software > principles. > > Possible options off the top of my head: > - GitLab,