Jan Pokorný <jpoko...@redhat.com> writes: > > But with the latest headlines on where that site is likely headed, > I think it's a great opportunity for us to possibly jump on the > bandwagon inclined more towards free (as in freedom) software > principles. > > Possible options off the top of my head: > - GitLab, pagure: either their authoritative sites or self-hosted > - self-hosted cgit/whatever > > It would also allow us to reconsider our workflows, e.g. using gerrit > for patch review queue (current silent force-pushes is a horrible > scheme!). >
My general view is that I also feel (and have felt) a bit uneasy about free software projects depending so strongly on a proprietary service. However, unless self-hosting, I don't see how f.ex. GitLab is much of an improvement (Pagure might be a different story, but does it offer a comparable user experience?) in that regard, and anything hosted on "public" cloud is basically the same. ;) crmsh used to be hosted at GNU Savannah, which is Free with a capital F, but the admin experience, user experience and general discoverability in the world at large all left something to be desired. In regard to workflows, if everyone agrees, we should be able to improve that without moving. For example, if all changes went through pull requests, there is a "required reviews" feature in github. I don't know if that is something everyone want, though. https://help.github.com/articles/enabling-required-reviews-for-pull-requests/ Cheers, Kristoffer -- // Kristoffer Grönlund // kgronl...@suse.com _______________________________________________ Developers mailing list Developers@clusterlabs.org https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
