[Developers] Re: [mmbase] RMI Port usage with MMBase
2010/8/12 Michiel Meeuwissen michiel.meeuwis...@gmail.com: Did you test which ports it actually uses (with wireshark or so)? Btw, I suppose it also logs those ports, which may be easier. -- mihxil' http://meeuw.org nl_NL eo_XX en_US ___ Developers mailing list Developers@lists.mmbase.org http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
[Developers] Re: [mmbase] RMI Port usage with MMBase
2010/8/12 Jacobjob Koster jacob...@finalist.com: We used tcpdump to get a clue of the communication between the servers. It uses the both configured ports for a short while, but than continues on higher ports. The higher port numbers have lots of traffic, compared with the 4023/4022. Ah. Then, I have no clue. Michiel -- mihxil' http://meeuw.org nl_NL eo_XX en_US ___ Developers mailing list Developers@lists.mmbase.org http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
[Developers] Re: [mmbase] RMI Port usage with MMBase
2010/8/12 Jacobjob Koster jacob...@finalist.com: Environment name=mmbase/rmmci/port value=4022 type=java.lang.String / Environment name=mmbase/rmmci/stubport value=4023 type=java.lang.String / Environment name=mmbase/rmmci/bindname value=staging type=java.lang.String / Environment name=mmbase/rmmci/RMIRegistryServer value=192.168.2.55 type=java.lang.String / - at live, the bindname=live; used ports are the same. Do you have an idea how to make the rmmci-module work again? I didn't see any changes in the module that could cause this..to my idea. It doesn't ring a bell. Did you test which ports it actually uses (with wireshark or so)? My first theory would be that it is still using only 2 ports or so, but the configuration is simply for some reason ignored. Could that be true? In any case it would be evident if you know the actual ports used... Michiel -- mihxil' http://meeuw.org nl_NL eo_XX en_US ___ Developers mailing list Developers@lists.mmbase.org http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
