Hi,
Regarding QContactLocalId in particular, I personally think doing something
like QOrganizerItemId makes the most sense, but more benchmarking and
prototyping is required before anyone could say for sure, I guess. Matthias
and Robin have mentioned (on IRC) some performance considerations wh
On Thursday 03 November 2011, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On 11/03/11 19:44, ext Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > On Wednesday 02 November 2011, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> >> and neither does foo/bar/libbaz.so.
> >
> > Why ?
>
> it's not abstract.
This is in itself neither an advantage nor a prob
On 11/03/11 19:44, ext Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 November 2011, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
>> and neither does foo/bar/libbaz.so.
>
> Why ?
>
it's not abstract. it does in no way refer to the packages it depends on
in turn. you can only make cumulative command lines.
>> you need
Le Nov 3, 2011 à 7:10 PM, Peter Hartmann a écrit :
> On 11/03/2011 04:12 PM, ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> (...)
>> The DNS query is not the problem. A query is always composed of a domain name
>> being queried, along with the DNS class (Internet, no one uses anything else
>> for real purposes) a
On Thursday 03 November 2011, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Thursday 03 November 2011, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On Thursday, 3 de November de 2011 11:48:24 Stephen Kelly wrote:
> > > No problem. If I understand you correctly, that's already the plan.
> > >
> > > # Network and DBus are optional
On Thursday 03 November 2011, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Thursday, 3 de November de 2011 11:48:24 Stephen Kelly wrote:
> > No problem. If I understand you correctly, that's already the plan.
> >
> > # Network and DBus are optional
> > find_package(Qt5 COMPONENTS Network DBus)
> >
> > if(Qt5Netwo
On Wednesday 02 November 2011, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Wednesday, 2 de November de 2011 13:38:15 Stephen Kelly wrote:
...
> > http://blogs.kde.org/node/4495
>
> How does it know which files are my headers? It needs to have a list
> somewhere, which needs to be given to the Qt5 macros. It canno
On Wednesday 02 November 2011, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On 11/02/11 14:56, ext Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > On Wednesday 02 November 2011, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> >> that idea is a non-starter.
> >> it starts with dependencies.
> >
> > What problems do you see there ?
>
> the way you expr
On 11/03/2011 04:12 PM, ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
> (...)
> The DNS query is not the problem. A query is always composed of a domain name
> being queried, along with the DNS class (Internet, no one uses anything else
> for real purposes) and the record type. For the record type, it's very easy to
On 11/3/11 1:05 PM, "ext André Somers" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Frankly, I don't really get this discussion. What is the rush exactly in
>appointing approvers? Why is there is need to speed up the appointment
>procedure?
>
>We have /just/ started working with the open governance model. I would
>suggest we
On 11/2/11 11:32 AM, "ext Holger Hans Peter Freyther"
wrote:
>On 11/02/2011 03:15 AM, Alan Alpert wrote:
>
>> Until the first release of Qt 5 though I don't see anyway to avoid
>> QtDeclarative needing a 'sufficiently' recent QtBase. sync.profile
>>implements
>> providing that knowledge, althoug
On Thursday, 3 de November de 2011 08:33:37 Quim Gil wrote:
> The existence of "marketing" or "community" specific mailing lists in
> big free software projects is quite usual. Probably for a good reason.
>
> Please consider. Thank you.
+1 and I'll subscribe.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (
On Thursday, November 03, 2011 01:05:49 Stephen Kelly wrote:
> I think ossi still has some feedback on it that we can work on later, but
> I've tested it, and it works just as the shell script version worked.
> Additionally, as most of the reusable functionality is now defined in the
> mkspec dire
Hi, I want to propose the creation of a mailing list focusing on
marketing, events and misc community activities not directly related
with software development:
- qt-project.org content.
- Marketing activities.
- Organization and involvement in events.
...
The problem is that many of the people
On Thursday, 3 de November de 2011 15:45:31 Peter Hartmann wrote:
> > An open question: should we have multiple lookupXXX() methods, or a single
> > lookup() which takes a QDnsRequest?
> It might make sense to have a generic method for querying any type of
> DNS; but then would we need a QDnsReques
On Thursday 03 November 2011 15:56:20 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Thursday, 3 de November de 2011 14:36:09 Olivier Goffart wrote:
> > Now that you mention it, this is a regression against Qt 4.7,
> > (isRunning and isFinished used to lock)
> > hence the patch: http://codereview.qt-project.org/#chan
On Thursday, 3 de November de 2011 14:36:09 Olivier Goffart wrote:
> Now that you mention it, this is a regression against Qt 4.7,
> (isRunning and isFinished used to lock)
> hence the patch: http://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,8063
> (that should be applied to Qt 4.8 please)
>
>
> That is not
On 11/03/2011 12:40 PM, ext Jeremy Lainé wrote:
> Based on some initial feedback I received regarding DNS SRV support in Qt, I
> have refactored my proposed code and introduced a "QDnsResolver" class which
> I would like to submit for API review. The point of this class is to provide
> a QNAM-st
Hi,
as Andre suggested, I am bringing an issue for attention here. My
original post: http://developer.qt.nokia.com/forums/viewthread/8914/
QDoc does not generate documentation for
QWebServiceMethod::invokeMethod() static overloaded function, while
the other (non-static) overload works fine. No er
2011/11/3 Thiago Macieira :
> == Larger implications ==
>
> The crux of the issue is that finished() is emitted by
> QThreadPrivate::finish(),
> which is run from *inside* the thread that is finishing. Depending on how you
> interpret finished(), that is a contradiction. If you interpret it as "th
Hi Jeremy,
The API needs a way to cancel the lookup.
Following the QNetworkReply, you could have:
bool QDnsReply::isFinished() const
void QDnsReply::abort()
QHostInfo has:
void abortHostLookup(int id)
However as we're using a response object, the abort method should be part of
the object.
QD
On Thursday 03 November 2011 11:37:25 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Hello
>
> First of all, required reading:
> http://labs.qt.nokia.com/2010/06/17/youre-doing-it-wrong/
>
> == Background ==
>
> Today, I was told that there was a timing sensitive test in
> QDBusPendingCall's unit testing. Looking at
On Tuesday, November 01, 2011 16:43:12 cristiano.di-fl...@nokia.com wrote:
> Hi Andreas / all,
>
>
> I have been at the DevDays in Munich, and unfortunately I was not aware
> about this meeting...would have been nice and helpful to join the
> discussion there.
It was an unconference (no schedule
On Thursday 03 November 2011 11:37:25 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Hello
>
> First of all, required reading:
> http://labs.qt.nokia.com/2010/06/17/youre-doing-it-wrong/
>
> == Background ==
>
> Today, I was told that there was a timing sensitive test in
> QDBusPendingCall's unit testing. Looking at
Based on some initial feedback I received regarding DNS SRV support in Qt, I
have refactored my proposed code and introduced a "QDnsResolver" class which I
would like to submit for API review. The point of this class is to provide a
QNAM-style asynchronous API to perform DNS lookups.
The resolv
On Thursday, 3 de November de 2011 11:48:24 Stephen Kelly wrote:
> No problem. If I understand you correctly, that's already the plan.
>
> # Network and DBus are optional
> find_package(Qt5 COMPONENTS Network DBus)
>
> if(Qt5Network_FOUND)
> # ...
> endif()
>
> if(Qt5DBus_FOUND)
> # ...
> endif
Hi,
Frankly, I don't really get this discussion. What is the rush exactly in
appointing approvers? Why is there is need to speed up the appointment
procedure?
We have /just/ started working with the open governance model. I would
suggest we first try it out in its current form for a while before
On Thursday, November 03, 2011 09:46:38 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Uh... "exactly" would usually mean that you're telling me that my
> explanation matches exactly what you were thinking, but I don't think it
> matches what you had said above: essentials and addons are a platform
> definition; mandato
On 11/3/2011 10:50 AM, ext eike.zil...@nokia.com wrote:
> One could also handle the "relevant people might be on vacation" issue by
> giving approvers a "probation period" where they are approvers in gerrit, but
> the status can be revoked without the hassle of a "vote of no confidence", to
> gi
Hello
First of all, required reading:
http://labs.qt.nokia.com/2010/06/17/youre-doing-it-wrong/
== Background =
Today, I was told that there was a timing sensitive test in QDBusPendingCall's
unit testing. Looking at the code, it was something like this:
connect(&thread, SIGNAL(finished()
On Thursday, 3 de November de 2011 09:50:45 eike.zil...@nokia.com wrote:
> Btw, I don't think the governance model handles how changes to the
> governance model itself are done
And how do we handle the changes to the way the model is changed? :-)
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
One could also handle the "relevant people might be on vacation" issue by
giving approvers a "probation period" where they are approvers in gerrit, but
the status can be revoked without the hassle of a "vote of no confidence", to
give people who where not available for some reason the chance to
On Nov 2, 2011, at 11:52 AM, ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Wednesday, 2 de November de 2011 11:14:47 Olivier Goffart wrote:
>> On Tuesday 01 November 2011 16:00:30 Peter Hartmann wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> hereby I would like to propose Richard Moore as approver for the Qt
>>> project.
>>>
>>>
On Wednesday, 2 de November de 2011 23:29:39 Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Then module support in qmake works exactly the same as how cmake config
> files work. If Qt5WidgetsConfig.cmake is missing, Qt5Widgets is not
> available.
Note what you said here.
> > > If the list has to be maintained somewhere,
On 11/03/2011 01:28 AM, ext martin ribelotta wrote:
> I'm trying to build qtbase (Qt5) with this options:
>
> ./configure -v -qpa -developer-build -fast -opensource \
> -no-accessibility \
> -no-qt3support \
> -no-xmlpatterns \
> -no-multimedia \
> -no-a
As was said in QtDD11 ( I think was Lars or Thiago ), "with Qt 5.0 it's
time to break binary compatibility"
What about this patch to be added to Qt 5?
https://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTBUG-840
A review of some methods to allow derivation ( means adding virtual on
some of them ) must be do
36 matches
Mail list logo
