Hi,
I think using the tracks is a good idea. Some 'keynotes' in the beginning
for everyone, and after that the tracks. These help in finding the most
interesting topics.
It would be good to plan a bit more ahead than last time (and have some of
the sessions announced prior to the event), but I
On 4/12/12 6:05 AM, ext Alex Wilson alex.wil...@nokia.com wrote:
On Wednesday, April 11, 2012 07:25:41 pm ext BogDan wrote:
the problem with QML desktop components is that
not all controls are touch friendly (e.g. lists, editbox, etc.), even
they
have Android look the feel is not the right
Hi,
I would like to Nominate Steffen Hahn and Johann Specht for Approver status.
Steffen and Johann have been contributing to qtsystems module for quite
some time now.
Give a look at their dashboards if you want to know what they have been
doing:
Steffen :
As this is a regression from 4.8 I assume it must be fixed for 5.0, rather
than just hacking the test to make it pass? I also assume I need to open a
separate bug report for it?
As much as possible we would like to fix any regressions that we find in 5.0
compared to 4.8, so that migration of
On 04/11/2012 02:11 PM, Sergio Ahumada wrote:
Hi,
Gerrit https://codereview.qt-project.org/ will go down at 09:00 CEST
tomorrow Thu 12th 2012, for deployment of fixes.
Fixes are:
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTQAINFRA-190
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTQAINFRA-195
From: Alan Alpert alan.alp...@nokia.com
To: development@qt-project.org
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 6:20 AM
Subject: Re: [Development] Qt5 missing features
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:28:43 ext Lincoln Ramsay wrote:
On 04/12/2012 11:00 AM, ext Alan Alpert wrote:
One thing I don't
+1 from my side.
Steffen and Johann have significantly contributed to SystemInfo and PS,
and I am sure our community will benefit from their skills and their
knowledge.
I definitely second them to come aboard the Approvers ship :)
Br,
-Cristiano
Cristiano
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:46:21 ext BogDan wrote:
From: Alan Alpert alan.alp...@nokia.com
To: development@qt-project.org
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 6:20 AM
Subject: Re: [Development] Qt5 missing features
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:28:43 ext Lincoln Ramsay wrote:
On 04/12/2012
To help with this I would like to nominate Casper Vandonderen as the
maintainer for our documentation. I've already talked to him and he's
interested and willing to take the job. This doesn't mean he is
responsible for writing or reviewing all the documentation we have, but
his role would be
Hi everybody,
TL;DR: We need to change the way Qt does documentation. A lot of things
will change and we need help from everybody.
As mentioned by Lars: We should make sure the quality of the documentation
for Qt 5.0 is as high as possible.
To get and keep our documentation in shape for Qt 5.0
On quinta-feira, 12 de abril de 2012 08.17.37, kai.koe...@nokia.com wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to get https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,22151,patchset=5
into 5.0/api_changes branch. It's one more change to the logging framework,
specifically to the signature of QMessageHandler (new in 5.0,
Op 12-4-2012 15:12, casper.vandonde...@nokia.com schreef:
Modularizing the documentation is a process that will move a lot of files
around and make some things impossible.
The biggest consequence will be that we will have the same dependency
chain as when compiling the modules.
E.g. not allow
On Thursday 12 April 2012 15:35:45 André Somers wrote:
Op 12-4-2012 15:12, casper.vandonde...@nokia.com schreef:
Modularizing the documentation is a process that will move a lot of files
around and make some things impossible.
The biggest consequence will be that we will have the same
On Wednesday, April 11, 2012 23:03:51 Robin Burchell wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 2:49 PM, lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
We are now done with new feature development and changes to our API. I
will merge the api_changes branch that contains the remaining changes to
our api back to master by
-Original Message-
From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=nokia@qt-project.org
[mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=nokia@qt-project.org] On
Behalf Of ext Thiago Macieira
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 3:14 PM
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development]
Hi, just wanted to share some download stats with you guys:
10668 /qt5.0/alpha/qt-everywhere-opensource-src-5.0.0-alpha.7z
1
/qt5.0/alpha/qt-everywhere-opensource-src-5.0.0-alpha.7z?51580699043405175974186249732156
93 /qt5.0/alpha/qt-everywhere-opensource-src-5.0.0-alpha.tar.7z
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 04:26:12PM +0200, ext Stephen Kelly wrote:
I'd like to see another model attempted next time, like all commits
going to master, and a 'stable' branch which gets fast forwarded once
a week
that's besides the point. people must work on the bleeding edge.
bic/sic changes
snip, theme GUI interfaces for QML
A theme manager will make the things much more simpler and clear for the
user and
when it comes to add support for other platforms. snip,
Let me try explain more:
From user perspective: snip, want to re-use controls with different
themes
From
While I understand the reasoning, I am not sure the limitations above
are acceptable. At least, if I understand you correctly.
I think that loosing all the cross links and all the inherited-by links
that span modules is unaceptable. For instance, you would no longer be
able to see relations
On Thursday 12 April 2012 16:30:39 casper.vandonde...@nokia.com wrote:
While I understand the reasoning, I am not sure the limitations above
are acceptable. At least, if I understand you correctly.
I think that loosing all the cross links and all the inherited-by links
that span modules
There are 2 main problems with the current system:
1. Nobody was running make docs on their local machines (and verifying the
output). There are qdoc errors that were put in by developers last
December. Having the documentation modularized will at some point
(hopefully soon) allow us to put
2012/4/12 Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com:
Not for long. I still need to change fromAscii to be fromUtf8. Provided it
doesn't break too much.
I'm happy to help fix test failures (of which I am sure there will be
a fair few) once there's something to work with.
On 04/12/2012 06:12 AM, ext casper.vandonde...@nokia.com wrote:
To get and keep our documentation in shape for Qt 5.0 and beyond I think
we will need to tackle the following problems:
1. The documentation is not modularized.
2. The documentation build system is hard to explain to people.
On 4/12/12 3:39 PM, ext Girish Ramakrishnan gir...@forwardbias.in
wrote:
Hi Lars,
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 5:49 AM, lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
Hi everybody,
hope many of you had the chance to take some time off over easter. I
certainly did.
Now that the alpha is out, there's work we need
On 4/12/12 7:27 PM, ext casper.vandonde...@nokia.com
casper.vandonde...@nokia.com wrote:
There are 2 main problems with the current system:
1. Nobody was running make docs on their local machines (and
verifying the
output). There are qdoc errors that were put in by developers last
December.
2012/4/12 Stephen Kelly stephen.ke...@kdab.com:
I think it didn't work well.
While I'm not you, and you didn't really extrapolate on why you think
that, I do agree that it certainly wasn't perfect - but the times when
it wasn't perfect it was mostly things that either don't apply anymore
or can
On 04/11/2012 05:49 AM, ext lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
To help with this I would like to nominate Casper Vandonderen as the
maintainer for our documentation.
Great!
Jason has been leading Qt (and Qtopia)
releases a couple of times in the past within both Trolltech and Nokia. He
will be
On 04/11/2012 02:23 PM, ext André Pönitz wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:01:13AM -0700, Quim Gil wrote:
Just to be clear: Nokia employees follow the same registration process,
like anybody else. Organizers too. Lars too. Me too. Everybody.
If you say so...
On 04/11/2012 11:14 AM, ext Sivan Greenberg wrote:
Thoughts, suggestions corrections (this is mostly my 2c from last
year's experience, the track names are solely for demonstration) ?
One aspect to consider: we will have video recording in the main room
but not in the rest of the rooms.
Before I would do such a change I would check if there are other projects in QT
they install their own messaghandler.
I think they all need to change their code as well.
Maybe we should keep it as it is.
Cheers,
WB
-Original Message-
From:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 02:44:36PM -0700, Quim Gil wrote:
On 04/11/2012 02:23 PM, ext André Pönitz wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:01:13AM -0700, Quim Gil wrote:
Just to be clear: Nokia employees follow the same registration process,
like anybody else. Organizers too. Lars too. Me too.
Quim,
I agree with André on this one. Google's terms and policies are quite
complicated, and it's not right for the Qt Project to force anyone to abide by
their terms. We need to stop using their spreadsheet and find other ways to
organize the information you need to keep tabs on the
Ok. The system we have now was discussed and agreed in the [Marketing] list in
a thread that lasted several days followed by a wait of more days until the
Alpha was released. It's a system that works, takes little time to manage and
is allowing us to get mew participants registered as we
Alright, forget all this. Let me arrive at home and change the wiki page.
I will start by asking people to send me an email with those fields. Any
improvement from that lowest point is welcome.
Quim
On 4/12/12 6:50 PM Gil Quim (Nokia-DXM/SiliconValley) wrote:
Ok. The system we have now was
Hi.
In general I applaud this effort.
I'm going to talk about some of the doc things Qtopia had. Most of this
came from our (infamous for being unmaintainable) mkdocs script. Given
the reputation that script had I'm not about to suggest we implement
things similarly in Qt but perhaps the
Hi,
We had cross-module links in both directions. We achieved this by
running qdoc twice per module. Once to get the .index (used for
resolving links) and again to build with the other modules' .index
files. The only way to avoid doing things twice would be to have more
intermediate steps in
On 04/13/2012 03:19 PM, Vandonderen Casper (Nokia-MP/Oslo) wrote:
But I would be grateful if you would make a plan on how to turn qdoc
into a mini-qmake so that qdoc can parse the .pro/sync.profile, so
that we don't need the depends. Because that would probably also mean
that you have to run
37 matches
Mail list logo
