On Sunday, March 31, 2013 13:24:47 Stephen Kelly wrote:
Thanks. Eep, I do see a bunch of failures with my initial
qtbase-5.0.2-rc1
build:
The following tests FAILED:
1 - test_use_modules_function (Failed)
3 - test_dependent_modules (Failed)
Hi,
Since we are doing some preparations for Qt 5.1 release, it would be
nice to have some work done in advance, so we've created a wiki page
that we would like to use to gather all the new features in Qt 5.1
So, if you have added a new feature, please feel free to fill up the
wiki page
On 03/28/2013 07:05 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On quinta-feira, 28 de março de 2013 18.31.50, Axel Waggershauser wrote:
Somewhat related is the question: why is is necessary to have all
those (huge) dlls both in the bin and lib directory? Not having them
duplicated would cut down the above
Hi!
Could you please remove me from this list? Thanks!
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Previously it was possible to just pass '-sdk path' to the configure
script. That's no longer possible, due to changes in how the configure
script works. Is there any way to build against a custom SDK in 5.1?
Josh
___
Development mailing list
Stephen Kelly wrote:
On Sunday, March 31, 2013 13:24:47 Stephen Kelly wrote:
Thanks. Eep, I do see a bunch of failures with my initial
qtbase-5.0.2-rc1
build:
The following tests FAILED:
1 - test_use_modules_function (Failed)
3 - test_dependent_modules
Actually, this seems to go beyond just using a custom SDK path. If I place
the 10.6 SDK alongside the others inside the Xcode application folder and
configure with:
./configure -developer-build -release -opensource -confirm-license -shared
-nomake examples -nomake demos -nomake docs -no-c++11
On Tuesday, April 02, 2013 14:37:33 Rex Dieter wrote:
Can I download this package from somewhere so I can extract it and have a
look?
Here's my first try in the fedora buildsystem,
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=408328
The tests above were only done with a local
Stephen Kelly wrote:
On Tuesday, April 02, 2013 14:37:33 Rex Dieter wrote:
Can I download this package from somewhere so I can extract it and have
a look?
Here's my first try in the fedora buildsystem,
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=408328
Thanks. Your package
On Apr 2, 2013, at 9:51 PM, Josh Faust jfa...@suitabletech.com wrote:
Actually, this seems to go beyond just using a custom SDK path. If I place
the 10.6 SDK alongside the others inside the Xcode application folder and
configure with:
./configure -developer-build -release -opensource
This completely justifies forcing the _user_ to depend on and deploy v8
(barf) and a QML interpreter/compiler (twitch).
I was thinking about doing my own April fools by ANNOUNCE'ing the removal
of Qt Widgets and the change of Qt's overall direction to a JavaScript
programming environment, the
On Tuesday, April 02, 2013 22:03:14 Stephen Kelly wrote:
However, there is also an upstream bug for me to fix here. The Config.cmake
files contain incorrect arguments to find_package, so they are not able to
find their dependencies (eg, Qt5Gui cmake package can't find Qt5Core cmake
package).
Looks like it's a problem with using the g++ binary xcrun finds:
$ xcrun -sdk macosx10.6 g++ test.cpp -isysroot
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.6.sdk
-mmacosx-version-min=10.6 -o test
ld: library not found for -lstdc++
collect2: ld
I've created https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-30487
I can provide a tarball of the 10.6 SDK for anyone who needs it to test.
It's semi-painful to extract from an old version of xcode.
Josh
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Josh Faust jfa...@suitabletech.com wrote:
Looks like it's
14 matches
Mail list logo