thanks
Regards,
Robert
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 11:39 AM, BogDan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In order to see in which version they will be included, you need to check on
> each bug its "Fix/Version(s)" label.
> QTBUG-44337 is still not closed yet, I'm waiting for some folks to reply
> (check https://coderevi
Hi,
is there any chance we can get this:
http://blogs.s-osg.org/announcing-a-new-gstreamer-backend-for-chromium/
merged into QtWebEngine? I would see several benefits for Qt:
* GStreamer is the multimedia framework of choice for pretty much anything
else in Qt on GNU/Linux, at least QtMultimedia
Ok, many thanks. Now it is clear (just need for me not to be lazy and to
take and to read the documentation :) ).
05.08.2015 21:35, Matt Broadstone пишет:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Denis Shienkov
mailto:denis.shien...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
seems that QPointer::clear() does
Hi all,
seems that QPointer::clear() does not work as expected (for me).
E.g. I assume that QPointer:clear() deletes the internal object ... but
this not happens..
So, what is way to delete an object (1 or 2)?
QPointer p = new QObject();
1) delete p;
2) delete p.data();
BR,
Denis
_
Or make it a technical preview ... It is non-crucial "nice to have" *that will
make a lot of people happy* feature;-).
Cheers,
BogDan.
On Wednesday, August 5, 2015 6:50 PM, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
On Wednesday 05 August 2015 15:33:10 BogDan wrote:
> In this case IMHO we should delay the
On Wednesday 05 August 2015 07:48:42 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Uh... that indicates that the random number generator is never seeded in
> the tests, so QTemporaryFile / QTemporaryDir always tries to create the
> same file names.
>
> 256 is exactly the number of attempts qt_mkstemp tries before giv
On Wednesday 05 August 2015 15:33:10 BogDan wrote:
> In this case IMHO we should delay the feature freeze (and the release)
> with 5 weeks or to make it an optional technical preview with no API/ABI
> back compatibility promises. Qt Purchasing library is not crucial a crucial
> library that we ca
On Wednesday 05 August 2015 07:53:40 Knoll Lars wrote:
> >The release team decided the new modules should be released under
> >Technical
> >Preview for 5.6 (they came in 5 weeks past the deadline that Jani sent).
> >So
> >there's no rush in reviewing the API right now, as we've given us time to
>
On Wednesday 05 August 2015 10:03:31 Sarajärvi Tony wrote:
> As I logged into that particular machine that ran that build, its
> Users\qt\AppData\Local\Temp is quite loaded with stuff like
> tst_qfileinfo-RYGJOI
> tst_qfileinfo-sXgxSH
> tst_qfileinfo-t6LYMr
> ...
> All of those folders.
>
> If I r
On 08/05/2015 01:08 PM, Marc Mutz wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 August 2015 09:59:52 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
>>> How do we handle reviews beyond that? Should I make a patch to qt5.git
>>> and collect comments there, or would it be better if I make a mock
>>> change that includes the entire code base s
I remember some test regading files and folders having a problem a year or two
ago. The problem was that the tests weren't cleaned up. So windows ran out of
random folder and / or files it could create. So if the next machine happened
to pick up the build, it might pass, but the ones that had a
On Wednesday 05 August 2015 09:59:52 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > How do we handle reviews beyond that? Should I make a patch to qt5.git
> > and collect comments there, or would it be better if I make a mock
> > change that includes the entire code base so that we can get inline
> > comments? I
> On Aug 5, 2015, at 1:43 AM, Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt
> wrote:
>
> On 08/05/2015 09:31 AM, Knoll Lars wrote:
>
>> Well, let’s create the repository today and import the codebase so
>> everybody can have a look.
>
> Done!
>
> The code is now in
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/admin/
On 08/05/2015 09:31 AM, Knoll Lars wrote:
> Well, let’s create the repository today and import the codebase so
> everybody can have a look.
Done!
The code is now in
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/admin/projects/qt/qtpurchasing
I'll make a patch for qt5.git as well and collect comments on
On Tuesday, August 04, 2015 11:54:16 PM Samuel Gaist wrote:
> On 4 août 2015, at 09:24, Frederik Gladhorn
wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I would like to propose the tts parts of QtSpeech (the current dev branch)
> > for inclusion in Qt 5.6.0. Along with that I'd like to invite everyone to
> > rev
On Tuesday, August 04, 2015 01:52:57 PM Heikkinen Jani wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is it planned that this will be officially part of qt5.git or as tech
> preview under extra component?
>
Considering that we're somewhat late, and there hasn't been extensive review
and more changes are planned in the futur
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 09:31:15AM +0200, Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt wrote:
> The module has also been in active use for a while. My plan was to
> upload the whole history including the peer reviews (mostly done by
> Andy Nichols and me).
>
upload from where? and what exactly do you mean by "revie
On Tuesday 28 July 2015 19:06:59 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Deadline: 6 weeks before Qt 5.7 feature freeze.
>
> If we reach that date and the patches are still not integrated, I will have
> to make a decision as Maintainer as to the future of them. It will be to
> either apply them despite any brea
On 05/08/15 09:35, "Thiago Macieira" wrote:
>On Wednesday 05 August 2015 09:31:15 Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt wrote:
>> It's not huge and all changes have been through peer reviews already
>>(by
>> approvers in the Qt Project). The module has also been in active use
>>for
>> a while. My plan was
On Tuesday 28 July 2015 19:06:59 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Deadline: 6 weeks before Qt 5.7 feature freeze.
>
> If we reach that date and the patches are still not integrated, I will have
> to make a decision as Maintainer as to the future of them. It will be to
> either apply them despite any brea
On Wednesday 05 August 2015 09:31:15 Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt wrote:
> It's not huge and all changes have been through peer reviews already (by
> approvers in the Qt Project). The module has also been in active use for
> a while. My plan was to upload the whole history including the peer
> rev
On 08/04/2015 04:12 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 August 2015 10:43:35 Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Qt Purchasing is a commercial add-on module developed by The Qt Company
>> which implements a cross-platform API for in-app purchases on iOS and
>> Android. In order to
On 04/08/15 21:57, "Jake Petroules" wrote:
>
>> On Aug 4, 2015, at 7:12 AM, Thiago Macieira
>>wrote:
>>
>> On Tuesday 04 August 2015 10:43:35 Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Qt Purchasing is a commercial add-on module developed by The Qt Company
>>> which implements a cross-p
23 matches
Mail list logo
