Re: [Development] qtdeclarative-5.6.0-beta build failure on rhel6

Hi, Thank you Marco for your quick fix:) On 2016年1月27日水曜日 8時45分03秒 JST Hausmann Simon wrote: > Ok, I had another look. I don't think find_if is new in C++11: > > ‎http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/algorithm/find > > It seems find_if_not is, but not find_if. So I think what we see here is‎ >

Re: [Development] New KDE Free Qt Foundation agreement and changes to Qt

On Wednesday 27 January 2016 12:37:36 Knoll Lars wrote: > >Just to clarify things: does this change affect QtWebKit? > > No, only modules that are going to be part of the official Qt 5.7. And QtWebKit contains 3rd-party code anyway, so we can't change its licensing, ever. -- Thiago Macieira -

Re: [Development] Setup CI service

> -Original Message- > From: Ben Lau [mailto:xben...@gmail.com] >[...] > Hi Kai, > > I mean the official Qt offline installer (Linux) downloaded from > https://download.qt.io/archive/qt/5.5/ > > Before Qt 5.5, it could be run in command line environment and extract its > content by "

[Development] Setting up test server for QtNetwork tests

Hello, What is the recommended (and possibly easiest) way to set up test server for QtNetwork? I've found manual [1]. Is it the preferred way? If so, is Ubuntu 10.04 required, or other versions (e.g., 12.04 or 14.04) may be used as well? Isn't there any ready-to-use VirtualBox or Docker image

Re: [Development] [Interest] 5.7 feature freeze

> On 27 Jan 2016, at 13:34, mark diener wrote: > > The other major problem is that QQuickItem does not allow for > QSGTextRect, so updatePaintNode CANNOT have text rendering > in coordination with QSGGeometry. The current recommendation is to > try to coordinate using

Re: [Development] [Interest] 5.7 feature freeze

Shawn: Well, that is news, private API. QT+=quick-private #include Honestly, I don't actually care whether private or public, as long as I can compile and run from Qt Creator, I send out the entire app on android and IOS anyways, so that means I re-ship the share libraries every time

Re: [Development] [OS X]: native classes (widgets) used for QTabBar and QTabWidget?

Olivier Goffart wrote: Hi, > On Friday 4. December 2015 12:10:10 René J.V. Bertin wrote: >> Hi, >> >> What are the native classes (widgets) used to implement QTabBar and >> QTabWidget widgets on OS X? I was expecting NSTabView and family, but can >> find no occurrence of anything related in the

[Development] [DaD] New and Updated Modules and New Installers

Hello, dear developers! Once again, I apologize for using your lists, but my project still don't have your list :-) Time passes and Dad's Project develops. I have over 2 years building and share a few, I think interesting modules. Let me remind you that the official Dad's House on the

Re: [Development] API review and API quality

On Monday 18 January 2016 15:48:54 Andreas Hartmetz wrote: > Everything I have written about API applies to documentation as well. It > seems like whatever the implementor writes is accepted and that is that. > AFAIU that was not exactly how it used to be done at Trolltech when it > was still

Re: [Development] Setup CI service

On 27 January 2016 at 16:12, Koehne Kai wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Ben Lau [mailto:xben...@gmail.com] > >[...] > > Hi Kai, > > > > I mean the official Qt offline installer (Linux) downloaded from > > https://download.qt.io/archive/qt/5.5/ > >

Re: [Development] Setup CI service

On 27 January 2016 at 18:09, Koehne Kai wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Ben Lau [mailto:xben...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 10:57 AM > > To: Koehne Kai > > Cc: development@qt-project.org > >

Re: [Development] Setup CI service

> -Original Message- > From: Ben Lau [mailto:xben...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 10:57 AM > To: Koehne Kai > Cc: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] Setup CI service > > > > On 27 January 2016 at 16:12, Koehne Kai

[Development] 5.7 feature freeze

Hi everybody, we’re slightly past the originally planned date for the feature freeze, for various reasons (new stuff being open sourced, license change and being late with 5.6). But I believe most things should be in place now to do the feature freeze for 5.7 next Monday. There are currently

Re: [Development] qtdeclarative-5.6.0-beta build failure on rhel6

Ok, I had another look. I don't think find_if is new in C++11: ‎http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/algorithm/find It seems find_if_not is, but not find_if. So I think what we see here is‎ simply a compiler bug perhaps? Thanks to Marco it seems that we have a workaround:

Re: [Development] New KDE Free Qt Foundation agreement and changes to Qt

13.01.2016, 14:15, "Knoll Lars" : > Hi everybody, > > The Qt Company has over the last days signed a new and updated agreement with > the KDE Free Foundation. With this new agreement come some adjustments to the > open source licensing of Qt. Basically LGPLv3 will

Re: [Development] 5.7 feature freeze

Lars: I am sure I am not the only newcomer to QT who would love to add code to the 5.7 feature list, but barely have time to contribute bugs to debug 5.6.0 beta let alone look ahead to 5.7 Now we are faced with waiting until 5.8 to even think about a set of key missing functions in Qt QML. I am

Re: [Development] New KDE Free Qt Foundation agreement and changes to Qt

On 27/01/16 13:34, "Konstantin Tokarev" wrote: > > >13.01.2016, 14:15, "Knoll Lars" : >> Hi everybody, >> >> The Qt Company has over the last days signed a new and updated agreement >> with the KDE Free Foundation. With this new agreement come