Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development- > bounces+tuukka.turunen=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of > Thiago Macieira > Sent: maanantaina 22. helmikuuta 2016 19.32 > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt

[Development] QtQuick mouse event handling

Hi all, i want to talk about the mouse event handling in QtQuick. From my experience mouse event handling is rather unflexible. The current implementation is straightforward: the events are propagated from the top mousearea until accepted. This is fine however consider the common scenario of an

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

On segunda-feira, 22 de fevereiro de 2016 21:08:12 PST Knoll Lars wrote: > I can see the reasoning here, just as well as I see the reasoning of the > people that would like to get rid of VS2012 as quickly as possible. Why do we need to get rid of it? What are the problems with it, aside from

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

On 22/02/16 19:32, "Development on behalf of Thiago Macieira" wrote: >On segunda-feira, 22 de fevereiro de 2016 18:16:47 PST Turunen Tuukka wrote: >> Hi, >> >> For both WEC7 and WEC13 Qt

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

On segunda-feira, 22 de fevereiro de 2016 18:16:47 PST Turunen Tuukka wrote: > Hi, > > For both WEC7 and WEC13 Qt 5.6 should be a very good release to use, while > for WEC13 also Qt 5.7 is an option. However as Qt 5.6 is a LTS release > supporting both WEC7 and WEC13, it is a very good baseline.

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

Hi, For both WEC7 and WEC13 Qt 5.6 should be a very good release to use, while for WEC13 also Qt 5.7 is an option. However as Qt 5.6 is a LTS release supporting both WEC7 and WEC13, it is a very good baseline. With Qt 5.6.0 the WEC13 is still experimental, but target is to have it supported

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

This is a deja vu to me, somehow. please have a look at this discussion https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=development@qt-project.org=subject:%22Re%5C%3A+%5C%5BDevelopment%5C%5D+QtCS%5C%3A+Long+Term+Release+discussion%22=newest=1   To quote myself: " Hi Björn, i had the assumption you

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

On 02/22/2016 05:54 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: On segunda-feira, 22 de fevereiro de 2016 14:59:52 PST Roger Briggen wrote: WEC2013 is also supported by Visual Studio 2013 and Visual Studio 2015 (according to https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg154234.aspx) because it uses now the ARM

Re: [Development] GCC-built Qt 5.6 can't be used with Clang

On segunda-feira, 22 de fevereiro de 2016 11:05:24 PST Welbourne Edward wrote: > I'm sure there's a specific command for asking git whether a given > branch contains a given commit: but I can't remember it. > Still, git log dev..3726c4673 reveals that it is indeed not yet in dev. That is actually

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

On segunda-feira, 22 de fevereiro de 2016 14:59:52 PST Roger Briggen wrote: > WEC2013 is also supported by Visual Studio 2013 and Visual Studio 2015 > (according to https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg154234.aspx) > because it uses now the ARM Desktop Compiler. > So dropping VS2012 must not

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

Knoll Lars theqtcompany.com> writes: > > Hi, > > Now that 5.7 is branched, I'd like to propose that we update our list of supported compilers and platforms > for Qt 5.8. After some discussions with different people, here's an initial proposal from my side: > > * We drop support for VS2012.

Re: [Development] GCC-built Qt 5.6 can't be used with Clang

> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development- > bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of > Welbourne Edward > Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 12:05 PM > To: Stephen Kelly ; development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development]

Re: [Development] GCC-built Qt 5.6 can't be used with Clang

> Simon Hausmann wrote: >> Hmm, change ‎https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/147846/ was >> supposed to fix this issue. >> >> ‎The subject of the email refers to 5.6 but in the body you say that >> you are building the dev branch. If it is the latter, could it be >> that the fix hasn't hit dev

Re: [Development] Scalable UIs in QtQuick (take 2)

> On 19 Feb 2016, at 10:44, Gunnar Sletta wrote: > > Now every piece of code needs to also know about device pixel ratio and that > needs to passed down to image loaders, icon generators This is essential complexity, not accidental complexity. With high-DPI displays in use

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development- > bounces+tuukka.turunen=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of > Thiago Macieira > Sent: sunnuntaina 21. helmikuuta 2016 23.51 > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

Hi, On Friday 19 February 2016 21:01:02 Knoll Lars wrote: > Hi, > > Now that 5.7 is branched, I'd like to propose that we update our list of > supported compilers and platforms for Qt 5.8. After some discussions with > different people, here's an initial proposal from my side: > [...] > > *

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

On segunda-feira, 22 de fevereiro de 2016 07:59:55 PST Ziller Eike wrote: > > It would buy us, if we raised to GCC 4.8 too: > > - deleted and defaulted members > > Hm, deleted and defaulted members should work fine with gcc 4.7(.3) as well. Right, I think I cut/pasted the wrong entry. We'd need

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

> On Feb 20, 2016, at 7:04 PM, Thiago Macieira > wrote: > > On sexta-feira, 19 de fevereiro de 2016 21:01:02 PST Knoll Lars wrote: >> * We drop support for VS2012. This implicitly drops support for WEC2013. >> Reason is that the compiler is still having rather large