The status of new CI: http://testresults.qt.io/coin/
On 21 March 2016 at 18:19, MrMstormo . wrote:
>
> Looks like
> http://testresults.qt.io/ci/status/
> is stale? All reports are erroring out, and there's no reports for 5.6,
> 5.7 etc?
>
> Is the CI system on an early Easter break? :)
>
> -
On Tuesday 22 March 2016 03:01:44 Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On sábado, 19 de março de 2016 19:02:08 GMT Stephen Kelly wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> In case you missed it, I wrote an auto-modernizer
> >>
> >> https://steveire.wordpress.com/2016/03/19/aaargh
> >>
>
Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On sábado, 19 de março de 2016 19:02:08 GMT Stephen Kelly wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> In case you missed it, I wrote an auto-modernizer
>>
>> https://steveire.wordpress.com/2016/03/19/aaargh
>>
>> It is not quite AAA, as it doesn't convert
>>
>> QString s;
>>
>>
On Monday 21 March 2016, René J. V. Bertin wrote:
> For further comparison, here's a screenshot showing
>
> CoreText vs Cocoa+Freetype vs XCB+Freetype+Fontconfig
>
> all on OS X, using a theme & style based on QtCurve.
>
> The XCB+Freetype rendering is hands-down the easiest on the eyes for me,
On sábado, 19 de março de 2016 19:02:08 GMT Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In case you missed it, I wrote an auto-modernizer
>
> https://steveire.wordpress.com/2016/03/19/aaargh
>
> It is not quite AAA, as it doesn't convert
>
> QString s;
>
> into
>
> auto s = QString();
Thanks Stephen
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 07:02:08PM +0100, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> It is not quite AAA, as it doesn't convert
>
> QString s;
>
> into
>
> auto s = QString();
> I used it to port qtbase to an extensive use of auto:
>
> https://github.com/steveire/qtbase/commits/aaa
>
> This isn't something I
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In case you missed it, I wrote an auto-modernizer
>
> https://steveire.wordpress.com/2016/03/19/aaargh
Thanks for this blog post. It made me smile...and also auto aware!
(yes!! I did it too!) :)
-mandeep
>
> It is not quite AAA,
For further comparison, here's a screenshot showing
CoreText vs Cocoa+Freetype vs XCB+Freetype+Fontconfig
all on OS X, using a theme & style based on QtCurve.
The XCB+Freetype rendering is hands-down the easiest on the eyes for me, though
that's of course all in the eye of the beholder. It'd be
On Monday 21 March 2016, René J. V. Bertin wrote:
> Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> > If the right one is freetype, it looks like it didn't disable font gamma-
>
> It is.
>
> > correction. We usually disable that when using freetype, since they don't
> > have stem darkening, and thus gets must pal
There are certainly quite a few areas of the qtnetwork patch that I think
make the code significantly easier to read. I don't think I'd apply
everything from it, eg. some of the changes from int to auto just make
things less clear in my eyes, but other parts are a massive win. Thanks for
sharing th
Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> On 2016-03-19 14:02, Stephen Kelly wrote:
>> In case you missed it, I wrote an auto-modernizer
>>
>> https://steveire.wordpress.com/2016/03/19/aaargh
>
> Thanks for sharing. I admiringly adore all the abounding (and artistic)
> alliteration adorning the article. (Sorry,
Looks like
http://testresults.qt.io/ci/status/
is stale? All reports are erroring out, and there's no reports for 5.6, 5.7
etc?
Is the CI system on an early Easter break? :)
--
.marius
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://
On 2016-03-19 14:02, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> In case you missed it, I wrote an auto-modernizer
>
> https://steveire.wordpress.com/2016/03/19/aaargh
Thanks for sharing. I admiringly adore all the abounding (and artistic)
alliteration adorning the article. (Sorry, couldn't think how to avoid
"the"
Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> If the right one is freetype, it looks like it didn't disable font gamma-
It is.
> correction. We usually disable that when using freetype, since they don't have
> stem darkening, and thus gets must paler text-colors when fonts are
> antialiased.
Do you disable i
On Monday 21 March 2016, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> On Friday March 18 2016 14:15:32 Sergio Martins wrote:
> > To get parameters passed to QCocoaIntegration::QCocoaIntegration(), you
> > should use -platform cocoa:fontengine=freetype, which I haven't tried,
> > but similar works for me on Windows.
Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
>> So how am I supposed to invoke generate-forwarding-headers.pl ?
>
> No, it should be execute as a part of build process
So, it is as I feared. When I execute qmake and then make manually from a
terminal generate-forwarding-headers.pl is called as it apparently shou
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 3:01 PM, André Somers wrote:
> Are we following Sean Parent though? Because if we are, we better start
> thinking about also replacing our QObject parent/child stuff with some
> external forest data structure in the future...
Please, can we avoid thread derailment again? :
Op 21/03/2016 om 14:25 schreef Marc Mutz:
On Monday 21 March 2016 13:38:43 Sean Harmer wrote:
On Monday 21 March 2016 12:23:44 Poenitz Andre wrote:
It's to support one-to-many delivery of an event-like object to backends
potentially running on multiple threads concurrently. The type is not a
Q
On Monday 21 March 2016 13:18:18 Sean Harmer wrote:
> On Monday 21 March 2016 12:44:34 Marc Mutz wrote:
> > On Monday 21 March 2016 12:07:24 Poenitz Andre wrote:
> > > Marc Mutz wrote:
> > > > I said then and I repeat it now that imho template aliases are not
> > > > interesting for library develo
Sean Harmer wrote:
> On Monday 21 March 2016 12:23:44 Poenitz Andre wrote:
> > I will argue that if user code looks ugly by default, or needs one specific,
> > controversial coding style when using an API, the API is bad.
> >
> > A possible question here is why there's a need to have the QSharedP
On Monday 21 March 2016 13:38:43 Sean Harmer wrote:
> On Monday 21 March 2016 12:23:44 Poenitz Andre wrote:
> > Marc Mutz wrote:
> > > On Monday 21 March 2016 12:07:24 Poenitz Andre wrote:
> > > > Marc Mutz wrote:
> > > > > I said then and I repeat it now that imho template aliases are not
> > >
On Monday 21 March 2016 12:23:44 Poenitz Andre wrote:
> Marc Mutz wrote:
> > On Monday 21 March 2016 12:07:24 Poenitz Andre wrote:
> > > Marc Mutz wrote:
> > > > I said then and I repeat it now that imho template aliases are not
> > > > interesting for library development. In particular, I don't
Marc Mutz wrote:
> On Monday 21 March 2016 12:07:24 Poenitz Andre wrote:
> > Marc Mutz wrote:
> > > I said then and I repeat it now that imho template aliases are not
> > > interesting for library development. In particular, I don't think
> > > something like
> > >
> > > > > > template
> > > > >
On Friday March 18 2016 14:15:32 Sergio Martins wrote:
> To get parameters passed to QCocoaIntegration::QCocoaIntegration(), you
> should
> use -platform cocoa:fontengine=freetype, which I haven't tried, but similar
> works for me on Windows.
FWIW, here's a small preview of CoreText vs. Freet
On Monday 21 March 2016 12:44:34 Marc Mutz wrote:
> On Monday 21 March 2016 12:07:24 Poenitz Andre wrote:
> > Marc Mutz wrote:
> > > I said then and I repeat it now that imho template aliases are not
> > > interesting for library development. In particular, I don't think
> > > something like
> > >
On Monday 21 March 2016 12:07:24 Poenitz Andre wrote:
> Marc Mutz wrote:
> > I said then and I repeat it now that imho template aliases are not
> > interesting for library development. In particular, I don't think
> > something like
> >
> > > > > template
> > > > > using QNodeCreatedChangePtr =
>
Marc Mutz wrote:
> I said then and I repeat it now that imho template aliases are not interesting
> for library development. In particular, I don't think something like
>
> > > > template
> > > > using QNodeCreatedChangePtr = QSharedPointer>;
>
> should be part of an API of a library. We have a
On Monday 21 March 2016 10:46:40 Sean Harmer wrote:
> On Sunday 20 March 2016 18:28:37 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On domingo, 20 de março de 2016 12:07:01 GMT Sean Harmer wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Can MSVC 2012 configurations be removed from the CI please? My
> > > understanding is that this co
On Sunday 20 March 2016 18:28:37 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On domingo, 20 de março de 2016 12:07:01 GMT Sean Harmer wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Can MSVC 2012 configurations be removed from the CI please? My
> > understanding is that this compiler was only kept around to support
> > Windows EC but that t
> -Original Message-
> From: Development [mailto:development-
> bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of
> Adrian Jakel
> Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2016 7:00 PM
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] Problems with QtWebKit 5.6 / Please do not
>
30 matches
Mail list logo
