Re: [Development] There is the wrong behavior with QUdpSocket && EAGAIN on *nix?

01.03.2017, 13:28, "Denis Shienkov" : > Hi all, > > I have use Qt 5.8, and I want to send to the UDP socket many datagrams > (e.g. 1 datagrams, each datagram have 1000 bytes size). Totally unrelated to your main issue, but make sure you are using connected UDP

Re: [Development] There is the wrong behavior with QUdpSocket && EAGAIN on *nix?

Em quarta-feira, 1 de março de 2017, às 02:27:54 PST, Denis Shienkov escreveu: > Hi all, > > I have use Qt 5.8, and I want to send to the UDP socket many datagrams > (e.g. 1 datagrams, each datagram have 1000 bytes size). > > I use following code: > > int busyCounter = 0; >

Re: [Development] Focusing bug fixes to 5.9 branch and patch releases during H1/17

Em quarta-feira, 1 de março de 2017, às 04:38:47 PST, Marc Mutz escreveu: > > This also implies that bug fixes should now get pushed to the 5.9 branch > > and we should close the 5.8 branch soon. > > I disagree. Even if you cannot produce releases from 5.8 anymore, that's our > stable branch. 5.9

Re: [Development] Focusing bug fixes to 5.9 branch and patch releases during H1/17

> -Original Message- > [...] > > This also implies that bug fixes should now get pushed to the 5.9 > > branch and we should close the 5.8 branch soon. > > I disagree. Even if you cannot produce releases from 5.8 anymore, that's our > stable branch. 5.9 isn't stable, yet. If you release

Re: [Development] Focusing bug fixes to 5.9 branch and patch releases during H1/17

> So let me play the devil's advocate: 5.9.1 also will be canceled for > similar arbitrary reasons like vacation plans. or the universe might end for no readily apparent reason. There is no reason to expect either will happen, though. > Guys, by not delivering bugfix releases for arbitrary

Re: [Development] Focusing bug fixes to 5.9 branch and patch releases during H1/17

Am 18.02.2017 um 21:40 schrieb Thiago Macieira: On sábado, 18 de fevereiro de 2017 11:49:28 PST Konstantin Tokarev wrote: 18.02.2017, 22:13, "Thiago Macieira" : On sábado, 18 de fevereiro de 2017 06:36:07 PST Mat Sutcliffe wrote: Keeping 5.9.0 on schedule even

Re: [Development] Focusing bug fixes to 5.9 branch and patch releases during H1/17

Am 01.03.17 um 13:38 schrieb Marc Mutz: > On Wednesday 01 March 2017 13:13:17 Lars Knoll wrote: >>> Let’s conclude this topic now by moving on towards 5.9 as Tuukka >>> proposed. After some thinking I also agree that this is the best course >>> of action from where we are right now. >> This also

Re: [Development] Focusing bug fixes to 5.9 branch and patch releases during H1/17

On Wednesday 01 March 2017 13:13:17 Lars Knoll wrote: > > Let’s conclude this topic now by moving on towards 5.9 as Tuukka > > proposed. After some thinking I also agree that this is the best course > > of action from where we are right now. > > This also implies that bug fixes should now get

Re: [Development] Focusing bug fixes to 5.9 branch and patch releases during H1/17

> On 01 Mar 2017, at 08:58, Lars Knoll wrote: > > Hi, > > sorry for answering only now to this thread, I was on vacation last week. > > Let’s conclude this topic now by moving on towards 5.9 as Tuukka proposed. > After some thinking I also agree that this is the best

[Development] CI maintenance break next weekend 4 - 5 Mar 2017

Hi We have scheduled a maintenance break for the CI next weekend. This will cause the CI to be totally offline at least during Sat and could extend over Sun as well. We've planned to do extensive wipe or cleanup to local stored distro images. We have accumulated garbage over the years and the

[Development] There is the wrong behavior with QUdpSocket && EAGAIN on *nix?

Hi all, I have use Qt 5.8, and I want to send to the UDP socket many datagrams (e.g. 1 datagrams, each datagram have 1000 bytes size). I use following code: int busyCounter = 0; for(;;) { ... const QNetworkDatagram datagram(data, m_remoteAddress,