+1
--Liang
From: Development on behalf of Jøger
Hansegård via Development
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2024 10:52 AM
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: [Development] Nominating Tim Blechmann for approver
Hi all,
I would like to nominate Tim Blechmann for app
+1
--Liang
From: Development on behalf of Tor Arne
Vestbø via Development
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2024 10:06 AM
To: development
Subject: [Development] Nominating Jøger Hansegård for approver rights
Hi,
I would like to nominate Jøger Hansegård for approver r
Forgot one thing. If I didn't remember wrong, Nvidia only releases 340.108
driver for 5.15 and earlier kernel, and there are some community work to modify
it to work with later versions of kernel. I assume we can't support those cases
under this situation.
--Liang
__
Please report it in jira, https://bugreports.qt.io/ , if you think it's a real
Qt bug.
Please provide a complete, minimal example with enough information about how to
reproduce your issue according to https://wiki.qt.io/ReportingBugsInQt .
I have a machine with GT218 [GeForce 210] with 340.108
+1
From: Development on behalf of Volker
Hilsheimer via Development
Sent: Monday, December 5, 2022 10:57 AM
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: [Development] Nominating Axel Spoerl as approver
Hi,
I’d like to nominate Axel Spoerl as an approver for the Qt
About the gapplication, I assume it's sth about "man gapplication", see also
http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/impish/man1/gapplication.1.html .
-
SYNOPSIS
gapplication help [COMMAND]
gapplication version
gapplication list-apps
gapplication launch APPID
https://www.qt.io/blog/input-events-in-qt-6
Hope it helps.
—Liang
> On 8 Oct 2021, at 16:02, Martin Koller wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> seems QTouchDevice in Qt6 is gone, but I don't see any mentioning of it in
> https://doc.qt.io/qt-6/gui-changes-qt6.html
>
> Any hint to some information regarding th
Hi,
I think we haven’t move to “cherry-pick” mode, (dev first, then cherry-pick to
other branches) yet.
So still like before, do it in the lowest needed branch of 5.14/5.15/dev, then
cherry-pick to 5.12 if needed.
—Liang
> On 20 Feb 2020, at 13:03, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
Please help to create ticket for Project:Coin(COIN) in jira, thanks.
—Liang
> On 23 Feb 2020, at 15:19, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
>
> Weird thing is happening with Coin or Gerrit - all integrating changes got
> "Continuous Integration: Running"
> comment. Restaging leads to "Continuous Integra
We are using soft branching phase for two categories:
1. feature frozen or minor branch, like dev to 5.14, many new changes are
targeting 5.14 release, but happened in dev branch, and not easy to be
integrated or verified soon. the one week soft branching phase could help bit
here.
2. patch re
If you found anything else is missing, please let me know, thanks.
I think 5.12 could be full cherry-pick mode now.
To provisioning change owners, please do in 5.13 branch first and then
cherry-pick to 5.12 if needed.
—Liang
> On 3 Sep 2019, at 07:53, Liang Qi wrote:
>
> It happened so
During the weekend,
qt5 dev and 5.15 got integrated.
5.12.5->5.12 merges are done including qt5 and all submodules. 5.12->5.13
merges are still ongoing.
—Liang
> On 6 Sep 2019, at 14:19, Liang Qi wrote:
>
> Integrations
>
> * qt5 5.12 and 5.13 are healthy, the
Integrations
* qt5 5.12 and 5.13 are healthy, the last submodule update integrated at 2 days
ago
* qt5 5.14:
* ongoing: https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qt5/+/272221 , hope
it could finish a bit later tonight
* previous integrated submodule update is 8 days ago.
* qt5 dev:
It happened so fast this time.
But 5.12.5 was branched out before this cherry-pick mode change on 5.12 branch,
I plan to do the 5.12.5->5.12->5.13 merges after 5.12.5 is out. Is it OK?
—Liang
> On 2 Sep 2019, at 15:13, Kari Oikarinen wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2.9.2019 15.23, Lars Knoll wrote:
>> Hi
On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 at 18:58, Alexey Rochev wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I'm currently investigating several problems with building Qt with
> recent (r19 and r20) NDK versions. In NDK r19 Google added a new
> toolchain, and we need to use it for some features to work (e.g.
> LTCG). It would greatly simplify
https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtlottie/+/268295
http://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-77130
Liang
> On 22 Jul 2019, at 21:22, Simon Hausmann wrote:
>
> I think I fixed that last week. What’s your sha1?
>
> There is not C++ application linkage for the module in question so cmake app
>
Integrations
* qt5 5.12: submodule updated two days ago. The only issue is qtvirtualkeyboard
was decoupled from qt5, see https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-76371 , need
to wait COIN production update
* qt5 5.13: submodule updated three days ago. The only issue is
https://bugreports.qt.io/br
Gerrit admins,
Thanks for the upgrade.
I like MERGE_LIST feature very much,
https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/262306/5..6//MERGE_LIST
But I have one question, when I search a sha1 of one commit, the old gerrit
only shows the change itself, the new gerrit will also show all change
Integrations and Provisionings
* qt5 5.9, 5.12, 5.13, 5.13.0 and dev are healthy, after
https://testresults.qt.io/coin/integration/qt/qt5/tasks/1557406940 , qt5 dev
finally got integrated after about 4 weeks.
Merges
Please check
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/q/owner:%22Qt+Forward+Merge+
> On 7 May 2019, at 22:13, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 01:52:48PM +0000, Liang Qi wrote:
>> This is a very common issue when I do the integraton work in qt5.
>>
>> For example, currently we have 5.12->5.13->dev merge order, and the
This is a very common issue when I do the integraton work in qt5.
For example, currently we have 5.12->5.13->dev merge order, and the last round
5.13->5.13.0 today. One change(changeA) had been integrated in 5.13, and
another change(changeB) with duplicate Change-Id was pushed to 5.13.0 branch
Integrations and Provisionings
* qt5 5.12, 5.13 and dev are healthy, finally after
https://testresults.qt.io/coin/integration/qt/qt5/tasks/1552656661
Merges
Please check
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/q/owner:%22Qt+Forward+Merge+Bot+%253Cqt_forward_merge_bot%2540qt-project.org%253E%22++st
Integrations and Provisionings
* qt5 5.12 and 5.13 are healthy
* qt5 dev: submodule update on March 4 excluded qtbase, the previous one with
qtbase in about one month ago on Feb. 7. Currently only known blocker is
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-74126 , Parse error at
"ContactFieldType_Lo
Do you have any records for the qt5 integration history? How many minutes is
average?
Or what is next step in your plan? For example, let COIN to decide when to pick
up an approved qt5 submodule update?
I think there is no hope to stage any qt5 changes in work hour, perhaps same in
midnight.
Merges
* Submodules and qt5 are fine.
Integrations and Provisionings
* qt5 5.12 are healthy
* Trying to have a few changes from Ryan, about docker based network test
server for Windows, see
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/q/status:open+project:qt/qt5+branch:dev+topic:%22docker-based+testse
Looks like the index was also regenerated for October 2016,
[Development] Coin news - Jedrzej Nowacki
Tue Oct 25 10:22:41 EEST 2016
Current link:
https://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2016-October/055084.html
It was:
http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2016-October/0
+1
Thank Sami for lots of help on QEMU build and etc.
—Liang
> On 25 Jan 2019, at 09:06, Kari Oikarinen wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I'd like to nominate Sami Nurmenniemi for Approver. He has already been
> working
> in The Qt Company in the same team as I am for a good while.
>
> Sami has worked on
Lots of talks happened already on this thread.
I would like to think old model as "merge" model VS new model as
"cherry-pick" model.
In the old "merge" model, normally we will drop a branch out to
cherry-pick mode after having more than 3 branches and try to have 2
branches(change LTS branch to c
First issue on 2019!
Generally, CI/COIN was in a very good mood after the new year update. Then we
met https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-73116 ,
tst_QString::localeAwareCompare fails (dev) and a few other issues. Now it
looks like most of them got fixed already.
Merges
* Submodules 5.12->
qtbase and qttools final down merges are done,
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/249324/
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/249362/
And also qt5 5.12->5.12.1 final down merge is done,
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/249362/
—Liang
> On 8 Jan 2019, at 08:32, Jani Heikkinen wrote:
Merges
* 5.11.3->5.11 merges are done, including qt5, so 5.11.3 branch could be nuked.
* 5.12.0->5.12, qt5 one https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/248857/ is ongoing
* 5.11->5.12, still missing qtwebengine and qt5
* 5.12->dev, need to be done after new year
Integrations
* 5.12 is healthy
* dev
Integrations
* qt5 5.9/5.11/5.11.3/5.12/5.12.0 integrations are healthy
* qt5 dev integrations: qtbase didn't update for about two weeks
* https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-71804 'GLsizeiptr' and
'GLintptr': redefinition; different basic types, qtwebengine team is working on
it
Gerr
> On 11 Nov 2018, at 22:25, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>
> On Sunday, 11 November 2018 11:44:12 PST Liang Qi wrote:
>> I staged a few times from Friday night to now, got some changes integrated
>> and found some issues in them. Do you have some changes need to stage?
>
> On 11 Nov 2018, at 20:01, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 8 November 2018 04:00:08 PST Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 08:29:47AM +, Liang Qi wrote:
>>> I don't know how to use [Grafana] to show the statistic of qtbase 5.12
>&g
> On 8 Nov 2018, at 13:00, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 08:29:47AM +0000, Liang Qi wrote:
>> I don't know how to use [Grafana] to show the statistic of qtbase 5.12
>> integrations in coin. There are only 3 successful integrations
>> yes
Integrations
* qt5 5.9/5.11 integrations are healthy
* qt5 5.12/dev integrations: skipped qtbase after
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/243906/ .
* Issue: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-71550 , a fix at
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/244725/ , but didn't get integrated
A CI/COIN reboot happened on 11am on Saturday, and sucked. Once more around 9am
this morning(Oslo time). Let’s see.
—Liang
> On 4 Nov 2018, at 06:25, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/244145
> Integration started Friday 16:45 CET. I guess everyone shortly left for th
Integrations
* qt5 5.9/5.11/5.12/dev integrations are healthy
Merges
* qtdeclarative 5.11->5.12 merge(10 days) is ongoing,
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/243050/
* qtbase 5.11->5.12 merge, need help,
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/243826/
* qtbase 5.12->dev merged on Saturday,
h
gs of qemu64 instead of host-passthrough is in
> effect. See if that helps.
>
> -Tony
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Liang Qi
> Sent: perjantai 12. lokakuuta 2018 8.21
> To: Tony Sarajärvi
> Cc: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] Shutting
Thanks for the work, and sometimes in spare time.
But there is no success for qt5 integrations and qtbase in any branch since the
work from Wednesday night. See https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTQAINFRA-2273 ,
Angle building timeout (on Windows)
So I suggest not to restage in above areas at lea
Integrations
* qt5 5.9/5.11 integrations are healthy
* qt5 5.12, one integration was done this morning, but qtbase was two days old.
* * https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-70779 libqtgeoservices_mapboxgl.so
link failure on android. Root cause was found, need help to find final solution.
* qt5
Integrations
* qt5 5.11/5.11.2/5.12 integrations are healthy, finally for 5.12
* qt5 dev, 5.12->dev merge + dev submodule update integration just started,
let's see
COIN is a bit slow recently, the difference between backend vm numbers and coin
running numbers is a bit too much. Colleagues are
Perhaps it's related with https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/235352/ .
--Liang
On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 09:20, Helio Chissini de Castro wrote:
> Morning guys
>
> After compile 5.12 branch from yesterday morning, i got one KDE
> application failing due a compiler error on a generated moc file.
>
qt5 dev->5.12 is also done last night,
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/237349/ .
Please remember to retarget your provisioning changes in qt5 if agreed for 5.12.
— Liang
> On 21 Aug 2018, at 11:04, Jani Heikkinen wrote:
>
> Branching from 'dev' to '5.12' is now complete and Qt 5.12 Feat
Integrations
* qt5 5.11 integration is healthy, last one is yesterday, August 12
* qt5 dev, last one is August 11, excluding qtbase since August 8
* * http://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-69891 tests/auto/quick/drawingmodes
hanging
Tor Arne is working on that. But if can't get fix soon, sugg
For enabling test on 10.13, see
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/231978/ and a few other changes from
Tony. Hope that will be done soon after summer vacation.
-- Liang
On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 at 06:13, Tor Arne Vestbø wrote:
>
> > On 11 Jul 2018, at 18:21, Thiago Macieira
> wrote:
> >
> > On
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTQAINFRA-1681
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/216306/
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/229465/
People are working on that, hope will get update after summer vacations.
-- Liang
On Fri, 6 Jul 2018 at 03:54, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> I've just been told
Merges
* qtbase 5.11->dev, https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/231959/ finally got
merged after blocked about 3 weeks. A new round is ongoing,
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/233803/
Integrations
* qt5 dev, last one is June 29, 4 days ago. A new one is at
https://codereview.qt-projec
On Tue, 3 Jul 2018 at 10:05, Lars Knoll wrote:
> > On 3 Jul 2018, at 05:55, Thiago Macieira
> wrote:
> >
> > On Saturday, 30 June 2018 10:09:11 PDT Lars Knoll wrote:
> >> Hi Thiago,
> >>
> >> maybe https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/233693/ helps with this
> case.
> >
> > It did help some. I
Integrations
* qt5 dev integration is healthy, last one is June 29
* qt5 5.11 integration is healthy finally again, last one is June 30
Merges
* qtbase 5.11->dev is ongoing, https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/231959/ ,
which was blocked about 3 weeks, lots of changes from 5.11. I really wan
Integrations
* qt5 dev integration is healthy, last one is yesterday
* qt5 5.11 integration failed from June 9, last integration was done on June
22, but skipped qtbase and qtwayland.
* * Issue: [QTBUG-68773][1] qtwayland build failed - can't find some headers
* * * https://codereview.qt-project
Integrations
* qt5 dev integration failed from June 18
* * Issue: [QTBUG-68848][1] tst_QQmlDebugJS fails too often in CI, perhaps a
duplicate of [QTBUG-68741][2], the issue is there about two weeks, more talks
in [previous report][4]
* qt5 5.11 integration failed from June 9
* * Issue: [QTBUG-6
> On 19 Jun 2018, at 09:58, Joerg Bornemann wrote:
>
>> * Which branch do you run it in? If an early one, there's many merges to do.
>> If
>> a late one, all the subsequent merges are tricky.
>
> Our commit policy suggests that the right branch would be dev.
> You're right that the merges wi
On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 at 11:23, Kari Oikarinen wrote:
> On 18.06.2018 12:04, Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
>
>
> Other parts sound good, so I'll just touch on the big question.
>
> > And then there is the big question when we run it once over the entire
> > codebase.
>
> I'd hesitate to ever run it o
Integrations
* qt5 dev integration failed from June 2, a submodule update without
qtdeclarative was done on June. 9
* * Issue: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-68666
declarative_core::MappingManagerError::test_error() failed
* * * https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/222768 Simon is workin
On Mon, 11 Jun 2018 at 13:17, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> Link: https://wiki.qt.io/QtCS2018_Serialisation
>
> === Protobuf ===
>
> * Need volunteers to write a Proof of Concept
> ** plugin to protoc?
>
> About protobuf support in Qt, I have an old WIP change at
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/
5.11.0 is fine. Latest one is successful,
https://testresults.qt.io/coin/integration/qt/qt5/tasks/1525572833
But looks like there are issues in qt5 dev integration, please check
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/227670/ and
https://testresults.qt.io/coin/integration/qt/qt5/tasks/1525573813
When Qt Sanity Bot is on vacation, here is the temporary solution, click
"Review" button, unfold the "Sanity-Review" section under "Code-Review",
just do a "+1 Sanity review passed".
--Liang
On 4 April 2018 at 10:14, Dominik Holland
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it looks like the Qt Sanity Bot is down for s
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/q/owner:%22Albert+Astals+Cid+%253Calbert.astals.cid%2540kdab.com%253E%22,n,z
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/q/owner:albert.astals%2540canonical.com,n,z
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/q/owner:%22Albert+Astals+Cid+%253Caacid%2540kde.org%253E%22,n,z
https://wiki.qt.io/Branch_Guidelines
search "cherry-pick"
BTW, you always can ask in #qt-labs channel at freenode, see
https://wiki.qt.io/Online_Communities . Perhaps will get reply much faster
without sending emails in mailing list.
--Liang
On 26 January 2018 at 16:14, Igor Mironchik
wrote:
both are known and fixes are available.
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/215113/
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/215046/
— Liang
> On 21 Dec 2017, at 14:17, Ulf Hermann wrote:
>
>> You have probably already noticed this, but here’s an email notifying
>> you that we’re on it. Our Ope
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/214045/ was merged. dev is fixed now.
— Liang
> On 11 Dec 2017, at 12:22, Liang Qi wrote:
>
> dev is blocked by "Module "" () Failed to provision template
> 'qtci-osx-10.11-x86_64-3-9946c2’:” issue, should be fi
5.10 was fixed.
— Liang
> On 11 Dec 2017, at 12:22, Liang Qi wrote:
>
> 5.9 was fixed. The merge to 5.10 is on the way.
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/214051/
>
> dev is blocked by "Module "" () Failed to provision template
> 'qtci-osx-10.11-
5.9 was fixed. The merge to 5.10 is on the way.
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/214051/
dev is blocked by "Module "" () Failed to provision template
'qtci-osx-10.11-x86_64-3-9946c2’:” issue, should be fixed by following change:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/214045/
— Liang
> On 11
atomic commit across submodules not in Git, but in the
> gerrit/COIN layer so that COIN effectively locks integrations until commits
> that span submodules are finished
> * Something else?
>
> Cheers,
> Adam
>
> On 12/07/2017 11:22 AM, Liang Qi wrote:
>> Sinc
Since
http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2016-October/027542.html ,
Coin tests all changes against Qt5 instead of the latest version of all modules.
The situation is sth like, some new APIs were added to qtbase in 5.10, and
other modules were adapted. But around beta or sometime(
qtbase 5.9 is unlocked now. I didn’t see flaky things happened since yesterday.
—Liang
> On 24 Oct 2017, at 13:32, Liang Qi wrote:
>
> Hi, all,
>
> Since Oct. 20, only one change landed in qtbase 5.9,
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/209093/
>
> I will t
Hi, all,
Since Oct. 20, only one change landed in qtbase 5.9,
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/209093/
I will try to do manual stage in qtbase 5.9 to check whether it is because
flakiness test or others.
—Liang
___
Development mailing list
Deve
There is a gap in 6.19-6.26, only 2 changes are merged in qtbase 5.9.
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/q/project:qt/qtbase+branch:5.9+status:merged,n,z
And now we have about 40 changes in staged mode, I don’t see much chance to get
them in.
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/q/project:qt/qt
This issue was gone. qtbase dev is safe.
—Liang
> On 23 Jun 2017, at 09:27, Liang Qi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> There is an integration sucks from last night for qtbase dev branch. And we
> can’t restart coin to cancel it due to current 5.9.1 integrations. Hope we
> can fix the
Hi,
There is an integration sucks from last night for qtbase dev branch. And we
can’t restart coin to cancel it due to current 5.9.1 integrations. Hope we can
fix the issue this afternoon or a bit later today.
So please don’t stage changes in qtbase dev for now, thanks.
Best Regards,
Liang
___
On 27 April 2017 at 22:50, Wolfgang Baron wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to see msvc_2017 support on the Windows plattform for any
> version as soon as possible.
That will happen soon in 5.9, please follow up
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/191981/ and etc.
Regards,
Liang
On 11 April 2017 at 10:22, Ville Voutilainen
wrote:
> On 11 April 2017 at 10:30, Marc Mutz wrote:
> > On Tuesday 11 April 2017 07:49:28 Tuukka Turunen wrote:
> >> There has been a lot of discussion about this in the mailing lists, I
> think
> >> the two ones below sum it up quite well.
> >
> > T
On 11 April 2017 at 09:30, Marc Mutz wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 April 2017 07:49:28 Tuukka Turunen wrote:
> > There has been a lot of discussion about this in the mailing lists, I
> think
> > the two ones below sum it up quite well.
>
> ..
>
> You can close 5.8 on all other modules, if you wish,
On 19 March 2017 at 20:01, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> The rules are that only Qt Company people can import 3rdparty code, so I
> know
> I am not responsible.
>
> Who do I assign the bug to?
> https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-59586
For QTBUG-59586, I have https://codereview.qt-project.org/189
http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/supported-platforms.html
msvc 2013 is still supported in 5.8
http://doc.qt.io/qt-5.6/supported-platforms.html
msvc 2010/2012/2013 are still supported in 5.6
Compiler options for msvc 2015:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/fwkeyyhe.aspx
Compiler options for msvc 2013
Then there will be batches of merges 5.6->5.7->5.8 before the final down
merge 5.8->5.8.0. If your changes are after those merges, it will miss the
5.8.0 release normally. (cherry-pick only for the critical things after the
final down merge.)
And I plan to do the merges during weekends, if CI/COIN
On 27 September 2016 at 19:23, manish sharma <83.man...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am working on a project which consists of around 20 git submodules and
> we use jenkins as our CI. I was searching for an alternative to manage
> builds and I came across COIN scripts which qt uses to run its CI.
On 22 September 2016 at 13:17, Vlad Stelmahovsky wrote:
> Hi
>
> trying build dev branch and got this error all the time:
>
>
> Cannot read .qt5/qtbase/src/corelib/qtcore-config.pri: No such file
> or directory
> Cannot read .qt5/qtbase/src/gui/qtgui-config.pri: No such file or
> director
On 12 September 2016 at 11:20, Edward Welbourne
wrote:
> Marc Mutz said:
> > The obvious question is, then, why is only "the one person" doing merges?
> > Allow more people to upload merges, and you will get the spreading you
> desire.
>
> Several people can upload merges.
> One person looks aft
http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2016-September/027083.html
On 9 September 2016 at 08:39, Marc Mutz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't get notification emails from Gerrit anymore, and since the big
> downtime of Gerrit and dev ML two(?) days ago only sporadically.
>
> Anyone else seeing t
On 8 September 2016 at 09:36, Alexander Blasche
wrote:
>
> From: Marc Mutz
>
> >On Wednesday 07 September 2016 08:37:01 Friedemann Kleint wrote:
> >> ** After 5.7 is closed and sanity bot is upgraded (to handle
> >> cherry-picking), go into cherrypicking
On 7 September 2016 at 08:37, Friedemann Kleint
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the notes are at: https://wiki.qt.io/QtCS2016_Managing_Qt_Branches
>
> * Number of existing branches (5.6LTS, 5.7.,5.8 dev) causes a number of
> problems
>
> ** Strain on COIN which also has release branches
> ** Merging becomes inc
Could we disable RHEL 7.2? at least for QtScript. There is a failure in qt5.git
dev integration. It is the only blocker for it now.
https://codereview.qt-project.org/162195
Best Regards,
Liang
From: Development on behalf
of Frederik Gladhorn
Sent: Monday,
"Currently we can’t put anything new in, since Coin setup is frozen."
Due to my limited knowledge with coin, I don't understand this.
Coin, the new CI, should not bind with any paticular branch of Qt, but some
options and scripts could.
For the listed new OSes, openSUSE 42.1, Ubuntu 16.04, RHEL
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-53373 ?
On 18 May 2016 at 10:01, Bogdan Vatra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Did anyone tried Qt (5.7) with GCC 6 ?
> I compiled Qt and QtCreator (using debian's gcc 6) but it crashes in v4
> when I
> start QtCreator :(. It's a know issue or just me?
>
> Cheers,
> BogDan.
The status of new CI: http://testresults.qt.io/coin/
On 21 March 2016 at 18:19, MrMstormo . wrote:
>
> Looks like
> http://testresults.qt.io/ci/status/
> is stale? All reports are erroring out, and there's no reports for 5.6,
> 5.7 etc?
>
> Is the CI system on an early Easter break? :)
>
> -
Do you plan to have them in 5.7 release? Current dev branch means 5.8...
On 2 March 2016 at 08:24, Rolland Dudemaine wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I understand that 5.7 has now reached feature freeze, but I would like
> to ask for an exception for patches that have been pushed a few months
> ago already but
https://codereview.qt-project.org/146557 still need to be integrated.
On 8 February 2016 at 14:03, Frederik Gladhorn <
frederik.gladh...@theqtcompany.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> due to the strain that we put on the VMs that are supposed to get the
> releases
> out and do the testing, we decided to
On 22 January 2016 at 04:15, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez <
perezme...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The following three have something in common: they are all apps coded for
> Chinese people. I've been told that they need QPA's private stuff in order
> to
> have proper input systems, but I haven't checked
Perhaps QPlatformTheme::font() is related.
https://github.com/qtproject/qtbase/blob/5.6/src/gui/kernel/qplatformtheme.h
Regards,
Liang
On 21 January 2016 at 18:29, René J.V. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Not sure if this is the best place to ask:
> I think QFont::setFamily("monospace") should allow to o
On 6 June 2015 at 10:52, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> On Friday 05 June 2015, Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
> >
>
> Would there be any way to generate diffs or changes for QML APIs?
>
Perhaps a diff for all plugins.qmltypes files? But I guess that not all
were updated yet.
--
http://www.qiliang.n
qtimageformats: libwebp 0.4.3 update
https://codereview.qt-project.org/109955
https://codereview.qt-project.org/109956
And checked other 3rdparty: jasper, libmng, libtiff, there is no update
from upstream.
After Beta released, I will help to update qt doc and
https://wiki.qt.io/Third_Party_In_Qt
https://wiki.qt.io/Branch_Guidelines
It's still in dev/stable mode, not the current 5.3/5.4/5.5/dev mode.
https://wiki.qt.io/Commit_Policy
Make sure to follow the Branch Guidelines. Submit against the lowest
applicable branch from which a release is still planned.
I have seen more and more bug fi
Hi,
Looks like we have binary compatible check things(at least for
linux-gcc-ia32) before, but I only found 5.0.0 and 5.1.0 data. For example,
https://github.com/qtproject/qtbase/tree/dev/tests/auto/bic/data
https://github.com/qtproject/qtdeclarative/tree/dev/tests/auto/bic/data
I forgot how it
I guess you mean this on github,
https://github.com/qtproject/qt-labs-gimp-qmlexporter
Then please contribute to
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/admin/projects/qt-labs/gimp-qmlexporter
Good luck!
Regards,
Liang
On 7 January 2015 at 08:33, William Hallatt wrote:
> Good day,
>
> I forked an
I tried it with Qt 4.8 a few years ago,
http://qihome.org/qiliang/2011/08/08/clang-static-analyzer-with-qt/ .
And one time with Qt 5 a few months ago, but didn't get time to verify the
items in reports.
Regards,
Liang
On 18 April 2014 18:19, Jake Petroules wrote:
> This is awesome. I'm curious
Time is so fast.
I got some free time this weekend, and did a bit work for building QtOpenCL
with Qt 5. My latest work in the dev branch of following repo:
https://github.com/liangqi/qtopencl
If someone could setup a labs project, qtopencl, in codereview, maybe we
could continue work on this topi
Is it possible also to add sub categories under QtPorts for Windows/XCB/OS
X and etc in bug tracker?
Regards,
Liang
On 10 January 2014 23:51, Knoll Lars wrote:
> Yes, I was about to write a mail about it. We don't currently officially
> have maintainers for platforms, but they exist in reality,
Try github mirror?
git clone git://github.com/qtproject/qt.git
More in https://github.com/qtproject/
On 30 December 2013 19:35, Jiergir Ogoerg wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm trying to follow the pile of tutorials to be able to contribute code
> to qt.
>
> At
> http://qt-project.org/wiki/Git_Introduction
>
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
