[Development] Review please: natvis improvement

2023-05-15 Thread Nicolas Arnaud-Cormos via Development
Hi all, I've created some patches for improving natvis support with Qt6 (debugging Qt with Visual Studio), but they are stuck waiting for review for one month now: https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt-labs/vstools/+/472264 Who would be the right person for those reviews? I'm failing to

Re: [Development] Changes to Qt offering

2020-01-29 Thread Nicolas Arnaud-Cormos via Development
On 29/01/2020 17:02, Volker Hilsheimer wrote: On 29 Jan 2020, at 15:20, Benjamin TERRIER wrote: On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 14:10, Cristián Maureira-Fredes wrote: but for Windows/macOS this might have three solutions (maybe more): - Using package managers that provide Qt, - Download and compile

Re: [Development] Changes to Qt offering

2020-01-29 Thread Nicolas Arnaud-Cormos via Development
Hi Thiago, On 29/01/2020 04:25, Thiago Macieira wrote: On Monday, 27 January 2020 23:59:10 PST Christian Gagneraud wrote: And that's really bad news How many wget will get broken? This cannot be true, Lars, tell me that download.qt.io will still work w/o login/password. Please! The source

Re: [Development] How to port from Q_FOREACH to range-based for

2019-06-11 Thread Nicolas Arnaud-Cormos via Development
On 11/06/2019 21:51, André Pönitz wrote: On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 08:47:12PM +0200, Mutz, Marc via Development wrote: On 2019-06-11 09:48, Lars Knoll wrote: On 11 Jun 2019, at 09:35, Olivier Goffart wrote: On 11.06.19 09:17, Lars Knoll wrote: So, is removing it worth all the hassle to us and