[Development] Qt Virtual Keyboard (New KDE Free Qt Foundation Agreement and Changes)

2016-01-18 Thread Viironen Kalle
Hi, As Lars mentioned in his email about KDE Free Qt foundation agreement and changes, we’re pushing sources of Qt Virtual Keyboard to codereview. I’d like to propose the Qt Virtual Keyboard module to be taken as part of Qt add-on modules,it has been part of commercial Qt releases for some tim

[Development] New Qt Modules

2015-10-13 Thread Viironen Kalle
Hi, We’d like to have a bunch of new modules under qt-project. These are all needed in Qt Automotive Suite so let’s try to get this sorted out quickly to get things rolling nicely. New repositories needed are: * qt/qtapplicationmanager, Qt component for application lifecycle management *

Re: [Development] New Qt5.5.0-RC snapshot available

2015-06-09 Thread Viironen Kalle
From: Heikkinen Jani mailto:jani.heikki...@theqtcompany.com>> Date: Tuesday 9 June 2015 10:21 To: Richard Moore mailto:r...@kde.org>> Cc: "development@qt-project.org" mailto:development@qt-project.org>> Subject: Re: [Development] New Qt5.5.0-RC snapshot a

Re: [Development] New Module for Serial Buses

2015-06-01 Thread Viironen Kalle
Since there actually was no objections towards creating a new module for serial buses I propose that we’ll just go ahead and create a new Qt Serial Bus module and then continue discussion around first commits. Would this be acceptable approach? I believe that getting actual code for the basis of di

Re: [Development] New Module for Serial Buses

2015-05-29 Thread Viironen Kalle
On 28/05/15 09:22, "Knoll Lars" wrote: >On 26/05/15 20:14, "Thiago Macieira" wrote: > >>On Tuesday 26 May 2015 17:40:05 Viironen Kalle wrote: >>> On 26/05/15 19:42, "Thiago Macieira" wrote: >>> >>> >>> >On Tue

Re: [Development] New Module for Serial Buses

2015-05-26 Thread Viironen Kalle
On 26/05/15 19:42, "Thiago Macieira" wrote: >On Tuesday 26 May 2015 15:19:26 Hausmann Simon wrote: >>Good point :) >>I was under the assumption that the concepts are too different, but if >>they >>aren't then maybe a joint module would make sense. > >At the very least it's a superset and QtSeri