On 26/05/15 19:42, "Thiago Macieira" <[email protected]> wrote:

>On Tuesday 26 May 2015 15:19:26 Hausmann Simon wrote:
>>Good point :)
>>I was under the assumption that the concepts are too different, but if
>>they
>>aren't then maybe a joint module would make sense.
>
>At the very least it's a superset and QtSerialPort (the library) should
>be 
>moved into the new module. It's just two classes anyway.

I fully agree. At some point QtSerialPort should be moved under this new
module. Problem with QtSerialPort is that it’s so tightly tied into RS-232
functionality that its extension to support other serial buses isn’t
feasible.

-Kalle

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to