On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 07:53:41AM +, Vladimir Minenko wrote:
After yesterdays release we are planning to bump the Qt 4 version to 4.8.5.
Guys, would it be a big problem to wait with this until the end of this week?
We are releasing the final NDK this week and a change in the version is
On terça-feira, 4 de dezembro de 2012 11.56.39, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 07:53:41AM +, Vladimir Minenko wrote:
After yesterdays release we are planning to bump the Qt 4 version to
4.8.5.
Guys, would it be a big problem to wait with this until the end of this
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Konstantin Tokarev annu...@yandex.ruwrote:
There's no point in keeping separate branch purely for tags. It is just an
unnecessary overcomplication.
Actually, there is: it allows you to continue working in stabilization
branches, then discard those changes (i.
04.12.2012, 21:02, Pau Garcia i Quiles pgqui...@elpauer.org:
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Konstantin Tokarev annu...@yandex.ru wrote:
There's no point in keeping separate branch purely for tags. It is just an
unnecessary overcomplication.
Actually, there is: it allows you to continue
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Konstantin Tokarev annu...@yandex.ruwrote:
04.12.2012, 21:02, Pau Garcia i Quiles pgqui...@elpauer.org:
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Konstantin Tokarev annu...@yandex.ru
wrote:
There's no point in keeping separate branch purely for tags. It is just
an
] [Releasing] Bumping Qt 4 version to 4.8.5
I agree with Ossi. Your request doesn't make sense, Vladimir.
If you're taking the latest 4.8 branch instead of the released packages,
you're
in for a lot more trouble. I suggest creating your own branch based on
4.8.4 and cherry-picking any commits you need
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Thiago Macieira
thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
Here's a question to the project: do we want to merge (-s ours) the releases
from vendors into our official tree? And do we want their tags too?
Speaking with my Mer Project (/Jolla) hat on:
I don't think direct
