On Nov 23, 2012, at 1:27 PM, Robert Knight wrote:
>> The main reason for committing this now is to close the feature regression
>> from Qt 4 to Qt 5.
>> Qt 4 gets high-dpi support via the CoreGraphics paint engine. Qt 5 uses
>> raster and we need to do the implementation work in Qt.
>
> Have
On Nov 23, 2012, at 12:05 PM, Knoll Lars wrote:
> The patches look good, but I'd appreciate another review from a graphics
> person (Gunnar or Samuel?).
>
> Could you please also add some overview documentation about it?
I have that started in my high-dpi branch. I'll try to get it done as so
> The main reason for committing this now is to close the feature regression
> from Qt 4 to Qt 5.
> Qt 4 gets high-dpi support via the CoreGraphics paint engine. Qt 5 uses
> raster and we need to do the implementation work in Qt.
Have you measured at all how performance compares between Qt 4 and
The patches look good, but I'd appreciate another review from a graphics person
(Gunnar or Samuel?).
Could you please also add some overview documentation about it?
Cheers,
Lars
On Nov 23, 2012, at 11:20 AM, Sorvig Morten
wrote:
> Here are the changes:
>
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/
Here are the changes:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,40096
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,40215
And screenshots:
http://imgur.com/a/Zs6JJ
(You probably want to select the "view in full resolution" option for those)
This is a subset of the larger high-dpi patch presented ea
