On Oct 29, 2013, at 7:58 PM, Calogero Mauceri mauc...@actgate.com wrote:
The Qt documentation states that QDir::currentPath() returns The
application working directory. Shouldn't the workind directory be
initialized with the path the application was launched from?
No, it will be
Hi!
Dunno if this has been brought up before, but there's also this weird bug
still present in Qt 4.8.5 for Mac OS X:
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-23673
The simple patch I attached to the bug fixes it for me and others... anyway,
it would be great if that got fixed in 4.8.6
On 05 Nov 2013, at 17:01, Matt Broadstone mbroa...@gmail.com wrote:
Cool,
I've been in touch with the macports patch author and he submitted a number
of his patches this morning for review. I'm sure they overlap, but perhaps
there are changes there that could help as well (I haven't
On 02 Nov 2013, at 17:58, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On quarta-feira, 30 de outubro de 2013 07:29:56, Turunen Tuukka wrote:
We should have the applications made with Qt 4.8.5 on Mac OS 10.7 (for
example) working in 10.9 without serious issues. And we should be able to
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Sorvig Morten morten.sor...@digia.comwrote:
On 02 Nov 2013, at 17:58, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com
wrote:
On quarta-feira, 30 de outubro de 2013 07:29:56, Turunen Tuukka wrote:
We should have the applications made with Qt 4.8.5 on Mac OS 10.7
On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 06:49:17AM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On domingo, 3 de novembro de 2013 09:39:18, Matt Broadstone wrote:
I've been loosely following the macports effort to port 4.8.x to Mavericks
over here: http://trac.macports.org/ticket/40852. It seems like their
changes are
On Monday 04 November 2013 11:46:35 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 06:49:17AM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote:
We can't even click the link. If we read their patches, we can't write
the same later.
that's nonsense. any simple patch is not subject to copyright (though
it's
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Konrad Rosenbaum kon...@silmor.de wrote:
On Monday 04 November 2013 11:46:35 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 06:49:17AM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote:
We can't even click the link. If we read their patches, we can't write
the same
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 02:20:35PM +0100, Konrad Rosenbaum wrote:
On Monday 04 November 2013 11:46:35 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 06:49:17AM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote:
We can't even click the link. If we read their patches, we can't write
the same later.
On segunda-feira, 4 de novembro de 2013 11:46:35, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
that's nonsense. any simple patch is not subject to copyright (though
it's still good tone to credit the investigator). and anything complex
enough is likely to produce a slightly different patch anyway, even
after
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 08:02:47AM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On segunda-feira, 4 de novembro de 2013 11:46:35, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
that's nonsense. any simple patch is not subject to copyright (though
it's still good tone to credit the investigator). and anything complex
enough is
On segunda-feira, 4 de novembro de 2013 17:23:55, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
So one person alone cannot do it. Two can:
but we are big enough to be able to do a clean-room implementation,
don't you think? so the statement that we are not allowed to look at
the patches is simply not true.
On the current note - where can I find 4.8.3 compiled ? In Qt5 I can't
change layouts in GNOME and in 4.8.5 I can't use shortcuts with
non-latin letters . The latter is fixed , but not merged , and to build
my app bug free for linux I have to get a 4.8.3 or to build 4.8.6 myself .
Petko
On domingo, 3 de novembro de 2013 16:24:44, Petko Ditchev wrote:
On the current note - where can I find 4.8.3 compiled ? In Qt5 I can't
change layouts in GNOME and in 4.8.5 I can't use shortcuts with
non-latin letters . The latter is fixed , but not merged , and to build
my app bug free for
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Thiago Macieira
thiago.macie...@intel.comwrote:
On quarta-feira, 30 de outubro de 2013 07:29:56, Turunen Tuukka wrote:
We should have the applications made with Qt 4.8.5 on Mac OS 10.7 (for
example) working in 10.9 without serious issues. And we should be
On 29.10.2013 17.18, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On quarta-feira, 14 de agosto de 2013 13:15:42, Jonathan Liu wrote:
Hi,
Are there any plans for a Qt 4.8.6 release in the near future?
Qt 4.8.5 was unfortunately released with a critical graphics drawing
regression
On 10/30/2013 1:45 AM, Sandy Martel wrote:
Le 2013/10/30 à 11:06, Nicolás Alvarez nicolas.alva...@gmail.com a écrit :
2013/10/29 Calogero Mauceri mauc...@actgate.com:
...
The Qt documentation states that QDir::currentPath() returns The
application working directory. Shouldn't the workind
Hi,
On Wednesday 30 October 2013 00:58:05 Calogero Mauceri wrote:
The Qt documentation states that QDir::currentPath() returns The
application working directory. Shouldn't the workind directory be
initialized with the path the application was launched from? If that's
not the case, which is
On 10/30/2013 8:59 AM, Konrad Rosenbaum wrote:
Hi,
On Wednesday 30 October 2013 00:58:05 Calogero Mauceri wrote:
The Qt documentation states that QDir::currentPath() returns The
application working directory. Shouldn't the workind directory be
initialized with the path the application
30.10.2013, 03:58, Calogero Mauceri mauc...@actgate.com:
Shouldn't the workind directory be initialized with the path the
application was launched from?
In Unix-like systems children inherit working directory of parent.
If Finder has / as working directory and does not change it
while
On quarta-feira, 14 de agosto de 2013 13:15:42, Jonathan Liu wrote:
Hi,
Are there any plans for a Qt 4.8.6 release in the near future?
Qt 4.8.5 was unfortunately released with a critical graphics drawing
regression (see QTBUG-31579) from Qt 4.8.4 which meant that I am
unable to update to
On terça-feira, 29 de outubro de 2013 16:35:31, Calogero Mauceri wrote:
Related to problems with OS X 10.9, please consider fixing the following
bug with QDir::currentPath() returning root dir:
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-34300
our application is no more running for
On 10/29/2013 4:47 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On terça-feira, 29 de outubro de 2013 16:35:31, Calogero Mauceri wrote:
Related to problems with OS X 10.9, please consider fixing the following
bug with QDir::currentPath() returning root dir:
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-34300
On terça-feira, 29 de outubro de 2013 16:53:55, Calogero Mauceri wrote:
For some reasons QApplication::applicationDirPath() works properly on OS
X 10.9, but it returns the path to the app executable (the one inside
the app bundle). I'm wondering whether a similar implementation could
fix the
Le 2013/10/30 à 5:24, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com a écrit :
On terça-feira, 29 de outubro de 2013 16:53:55, Calogero Mauceri wrote:
For some reasons QApplication::applicationDirPath() works properly on OS
X 10.9, but it returns the path to the app executable (the one inside
the
On 10/29/2013 9:01 PM, Sandy Martel wrote:
Le 2013/10/30 à 5:24, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com a écrit :
On terça-feira, 29 de outubro de 2013 16:53:55, Calogero Mauceri wrote:
For some reasons QApplication::applicationDirPath() works properly on OS
X 10.9, but it returns the path
2013/10/29 Calogero Mauceri mauc...@actgate.com:
On 10/29/2013 9:01 PM, Sandy Martel wrote:
Le 2013/10/30 à 5:24, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com a écrit :
On terça-feira, 29 de outubro de 2013 16:53:55, Calogero Mauceri wrote:
For some reasons QApplication::applicationDirPath()
Le 2013/10/30 à 11:06, Nicolás Alvarez nicolas.alva...@gmail.com a écrit :
2013/10/29 Calogero Mauceri mauc...@actgate.com:
...
The Qt documentation states that QDir::currentPath() returns The
application working directory. Shouldn't the workind directory be
initialized with the path
On quarta-feira, 14 de agosto de 2013 13:15:42, Jonathan Liu wrote:
Are there any plans for a Qt 4.8.6 release in the near future?
There are no plans to stop releasing 4.8 so far. There are 94 changes post
4.8.5 already, so I'd guess we are releasing. I don't know for how long: we're
going to
29 matches
Mail list logo
