Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8rt

2016-02-29 Thread Knoll Lars
On 21/02/16 19:01, "Development on behalf of Thiago Macieira" wrote: >On domingo, 21 de fevereiro de 2016 07:01:57 PST Turunen Tuukka wrote: >> > Thiago Macieira kirjoitti 21.2.2016 kello >7.15: >> >> On sábado, 20 de fevereiro de 2016 22:09:20 PST Allan Sandfeld Jensen >> >> wrote: Well, fea

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8rt

2016-02-21 Thread Thiago Macieira
On domingo, 21 de fevereiro de 2016 07:01:57 PST Turunen Tuukka wrote: > > Thiago Macieira kirjoitti 21.2.2016 kello 7.15: > >> On sábado, 20 de fevereiro de 2016 22:09:20 PST Allan Sandfeld Jensen > >> wrote: Well, feature-complete'ish. I recently found out we need clang > >> 3.5 to use deleted

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8rt

2016-02-21 Thread Allan Sandfeld Jensen
On Sunday 21 February 2016, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On sábado, 20 de fevereiro de 2016 22:09:20 PST Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: > > Well, feature-complete'ish. I recently found out we need clang 3.5 to use > > deleted constructors in Chromium. Clang 3.4 has a bug which will cause it > > to claim

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8rt

2016-02-21 Thread Turunen Tuukka
> Holger Freyther kirjoitti 21.2.2016 kello 12.19: > > >> On 21 Feb 2016, at 08:01, Turunen Tuukka >> wrote: >> >> >>> >>> That would drop FreeBSD 10.2, which is the current stable release today. >>> >> >> According to their release plans both 10.3 and 11.0 should be out well >> before

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8rt

2016-02-21 Thread Holger Freyther
> On 21 Feb 2016, at 08:01, Turunen Tuukka > wrote: > > >> >> That would drop FreeBSD 10.2, which is the current stable release today. >> > > According to their release plans both 10.3 and 11.0 should be out well before > Qt 5.8. Is 10.3 going to upgrade clang? I would assume that stable/

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8rt

2016-02-20 Thread Turunen Tuukka
> Thiago Macieira kirjoitti 21.2.2016 kello 7.15: > >> On sábado, 20 de fevereiro de 2016 22:09:20 PST Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: >> Well, feature-complete'ish. I recently found out we need clang 3.5 to use >> deleted constructors in Chromium. Clang 3.4 has a bug which will cause it >> to c

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8rt

2016-02-20 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sábado, 20 de fevereiro de 2016 22:09:20 PST Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: > Well, feature-complete'ish. I recently found out we need clang 3.5 to use > deleted constructors in Chromium. Clang 3.4 has a bug which will cause it > to claim deleted methods causes ambiguity with non-deleted methods

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8rt

2016-02-20 Thread Allan Sandfeld Jensen
On Saturday 20 February 2016, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On sexta-feira, 19 de fevereiro de 2016 21:01:02 PST Knoll Lars wrote: > > * We drop support for VS2012. This implicitly drops support for WEC2013. > > Reason is that the compiler is still having rather large problems with > > it's C++11 suppor