Hi,
On Monday 25 February 2013 17:11:53 Pasion Jerome wrote:
I would like to start the feature freeze Qt 5.1 middle of March. [..]
Quite a bit of new functionality has made it into the dev branch, but
I'd also like to add a few of the modules left out in 5.0 to the
release. The
Don't forget Qt Win Extras
On Tuesday, February 26, 2013, Thomas McGuire wrote:
Hi,
On Monday 25 February 2013 17:11:53 Pasion Jerome wrote:
I would like to start the feature freeze Qt 5.1 middle of March. [..]
Quite a bit of new functionality has made it into the dev branch, but
Hi,
On Wednesday 13 February 2013 09:49:56 Knoll Lars wrote:
Hi everybody,
I would like to start the feature freeze Qt 5.1 middle of March. This is a
bit later then I originally proposed in December. There's two reasons for
this. First of all it'll reduce some of the integration pressure
: [Development] Qt 5.1 feature set and freeze date
Hi,
On Wednesday 13 February 2013 09:49:56 Knoll Lars wrote:
Hi everybody,
I would like to start the feature freeze Qt 5.1 middle of March. This is a
bit later then I originally proposed in December. There's two reasons for
this. First of all it'll
On Wednesday 13 February 2013 08:49:56 Knoll Lars wrote:
* Friday 22. February: If you have a larger feature/feature branch (not
yet merged) that you want to have in the release you must have told the
release team (by mail to releases@) by then.
QLockFile is almost ready, I've been revising it
On 02/13/2013 08:58 PM, André Pönitz wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:08:31AM +0100, Friedemann Kleint wrote:
Hi,
we also plan to start Qt Windows Extras to bring at least the missing
image conversion functions ( QTBUG-27103 ) back provided we can find
someone to create the repository ;-)
On 02/14/2013 05:58 PM, Ivan Vizir wrote:
Hello,
There're no problems with Qt Windows Extras. As I said somewhen in
January, I plan to contribute to Qt my code, when it's done. Current
results you can see at http://github.com/dtf/QtWindowsExtras .
For now features what are ready are:
---
Samuel Rødal wrote:
What use is a QPlatformPixmapHandle having per-platform typedefs
(xcb_pixmap_t, HDC, etc) without #ifdefs to manipulate it using native
code in the first place?
Can you give a platform-independent example use case? :)
It helps reducing the amount of user code within
Since the Window frame in Windows is owned by the application, how about the possibility of customising the appearance of the Window frame? Or being able to catch the window events associated with window frames like minimize, maximize clicks so I would write my own cusom window frames. Just
On 02/14/2013 10:39 AM, Poenitz Andre wrote:
Samuel Rødal wrote:
What use is a QPlatformPixmapHandle having per-platform typedefs
(xcb_pixmap_t, HDC, etc) without #ifdefs to manipulate it using native
code in the first place?
Can you give a platform-independent example use case? :)
It
Rodal Samuel wrote:
On 02/14/2013 10:39 AM, Poenitz Andre wrote:
Samuel Rødal wrote:
What use is a QPlatformPixmapHandle having per-platform typedefs
(xcb_pixmap_t, HDC, etc) without #ifdefs to manipulate it using native
code in the first place?
Can you give a platform-independent example
On 02/14/2013 05:58 AM, André Pönitz wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:08:31AM +0100, Friedemann Kleint wrote:
Hi,
we also plan to start Qt Windows Extras to bring at least the missing
image conversion functions ( QTBUG-27103 ) back provided we can find
someone to create the repository ;-)
On 14/02/13 04:37, John Layt wrote:
On 13 February 2013 15:13, Koehne Kai kai.koe...@digia.com wrote:
Which parts of the ICU data are you using (from
http://apps.icu-project.org/datacustom/ ) ?
I'd really like us to strip down the default ICU libs on windows for 5.1 ...
Good question. I
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 09:42:05PM +1000, Joseph Crowell wrote:
On 02/14/2013 05:58 AM, André Pönitz wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:08:31AM +0100, Friedemann Kleint wrote:
Hi,
we also plan to start Qt Windows Extras to bring at least the missing
image conversion functions (
On 14 February 2013 19:21, Lorn Potter lorn.pot...@gmail.com wrote:
Back long ago
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-71
(feel free to assign that one to yourself!)
:)
Will do :-)
I was working on porting qtopia's timezone class to qt.
I added full windows olsen conversion.
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Ivan Vizir define-true-fa...@yandex.comwrote:
I thought I could finish module following Qt module guidelines and then
propose it for review, but if you want to see Qt Windows Extras as a part
of Qt 5.1, we could move it to Qt Playground and work on it together.
On 2/13/13 9:54 AM, Mülner, Helmut helmut.muel...@joanneum.at wrote:
[...]
Quite a bit of new functionality has made it into the dev branch, but
I'd also
like to add a few of the modules left out in 5.0 to the release. The
candidates
I can see so far are:
* Qt X11 Extras
* Qt Mac Extras
[...]
No Qt3D? :-(
No, unfortunately not.
We've gone through it, and it will require some more work to make it suitable
for inclusion. Sean can give details on it. But you can continue to use the
module as is (knowing the APIs will still change slightly).
Unfortunately I cannot use
Hi,
we also plan to start Qt Windows Extras to bring at least the missing
image conversion functions ( QTBUG-27103 ) back provided we can find
someone to create the repository ;-) .
Friedemann
--
Friedemann Kleint
Digia, Qt
___
Development
On 2/13/13 10:08 AM, Friedemann Kleint friedemann.kle...@digia.com
wrote:
Hi,
we also plan to start Qt Windows Extras to bring at least the missing
image conversion functions ( QTBUG-27103 ) back provided we can find
someone to create the repository ;-) .
Ok. Sergio can hopefully help with
Hi Sean,
On Wednesday 13 February 2013 10:06:41 Mülner, Helmut wrote:
[...]
No Qt3D? :-(
No, unfortunately not.
We've gone through it, and it will require some more work to make it
suitable for inclusion. Sean can give details on it. But you can
continue to use the
I would also like to hear more about the Qt3D module from Sean. What
is future plans, etc.
Regards,
Dmitrii.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
See the OpenGL in Qt 5.1 and onwards thread for details for instance.
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Дмитрий Волосных
dmitry.volosn...@gmail.com wrote:
I would also like to hear more about the Qt3D module from Sean. What
is future plans, etc.
Regards,
Dmitrii.
On 2/13/13 10:58 AM, Shaw Andy andy.s...@digia.com wrote:
[snip]
* Friday 15. March: Feature freeze. Merge from dev to stable.
What will happen to Qt 5.0.x at this point, does it mean we do not plan
to do any further 5.0.x releases after Qt 5.1.0 is out in April? Or will
we have a 5.0 branch
On Wednesday 13 Feb 2013 08:49:56 Knoll Lars wrote:
The detailed timeline will be as follows:
* Friday 22. February: If you have a larger feature/feature branch (not
yet merged) that you want to have in the release you must have told the
release team (by mail to releases@) by then.
*
On Wednesday 13 February 2013 08:59:39 Knoll Lars wrote:
On 2/13/13 9:54 AM, Mülner, Helmut helmut.muel...@joanneum.at wrote:
[...]
Quite a bit of new functionality has made it into the dev branch, but
I'd also
like to add a few of the modules left out in 5.0 to the release. The
On Wednesday 13 February 2013 08:49:56 Knoll Lars wrote:
Hi everybody,
I would like to start the feature freeze Qt 5.1 middle of March. This is a
bit later then I originally proposed in December. There's two reasons for
this. First of all it'll reduce some of the integration pressure for the
On 02/13/2013 12:49 PM, Knoll Lars wrote:
* Friday 22. February: If you have a larger feature/feature branch (not
yet merged) that you want to have in the release you must have told the
release team (by mail to releases@) by then.
I'd like to have the X11 Embedding in 5.1:
snip, no Qt3D for mid-March Qt5.1 feature freeze
Sean sayeth:
snip, summary of Qt3D API and internals push for Qt5.2
I also was disappointed that Qt3D would not make it into Qt5.1, but IMHO
the details Sean (and James Turner) provided are quite excellent -- there's
a lot there, and it makes
-Original Message-
From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org
[mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org] On
Behalf Of John Layt
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 11:17 AM
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] Qt 5.1
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Knoll Lars lars.kn...@digia.com wrote:
Hi everybody,
I would like to start the feature freeze Qt 5.1 middle of March. This is a
bit later then I originally proposed in December. There's two reasons for
this. First of all it'll reduce some of the integration
QtWindowsExtras is something I plan to contribute to heavily. What things
would folks like to see in there besides the image conversion functions? I
suggested Windows 7 task bar features a little while back, and I believe
that there is a Windows counterpart to QMacPasteboardMime that needs
On 13 February 2013 15:13, Koehne Kai kai.koe...@digia.com wrote:
Which parts of the ICU data are you using (from
http://apps.icu-project.org/datacustom/ ) ?
I'd really like us to strip down the default ICU libs on windows for 5.1 ...
Good question. I think the following under
On 13 February 2013 18:37, John Layt jl...@kde.org wrote:
supplementalData.res
timezoneTypes.res
windowsZones.res
zone/*.res
Oh, also looks like:
metaZones.res
zoneinfo64.res
I wish ICU wrote better documentation :-)
John.
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:08:31AM +0100, Friedemann Kleint wrote:
Hi,
we also plan to start Qt Windows Extras to bring at least the missing
image conversion functions ( QTBUG-27103 ) back provided we can find
someone to create the repository ;-) .
I think the approach of per-platform
Op 13-2-2013 18:24, Jake Petroules schreef:
QtWindowsExtras is something I plan to contribute to heavily. What
things would folks like to see in there besides the image conversion
functions? I suggested Windows 7 task bar features a little while
back, and I believe that there is a Windows
Hello, There're no problems with Qt Windows Extras. As I said somewhen in January, I plan to contribute to Qt my code, when it's done. Current results you can see at http://github.com/dtf/QtWindowsExtras . For now features what are ready are:— progress bar indicator;— overlay icons;— thumbnails
37 matches
Mail list logo
