Re: [Development] Changing definition of Qt meta macro to allow tools integration

2016-03-31 Thread Nikolai Kosjar
On 03/31/2016 12:10 AM, Olivier Goffart wrote: The question is rather, the Qt creator that will be release in 2 years will maybe want to use these macros to auto complete signals/slots and properties. I would assume some people would still have a LTS version of Qt which would then be, say Qt

[Development] Help with QChart 2.0

2016-03-31 Thread Scott Aron Bloom
I had previously posted some issues I found with the new QChart system. I haven't heard back from anyone.. Is there a better place to post usage issues? Scott ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org

Re: [Development] Changing definition of Qt meta macro to allow tools integration

2016-03-31 Thread Olivier Goffart
Am Mittwoch, 30. März 2016, 21:04:50 CEST schrieb Thiago Macieira: > On quinta-feira, 31 de março de 2016 00:10:48 PDT Olivier Goffart wrote: > > The question is rather, the Qt creator that will be release in 2 years > > will > > maybe want to use these macros to auto complete signals/slots and >

Re: [Development] QThreadStorage and C++11

2016-03-31 Thread Welbourne Edward
On quarta-feira, 30 de março de 2016 22:23:35 PDT Konstantin Tokarev wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Are there any plans to reimplement QThreadStorage via thread_local for >> compilers which support it? Thiago Macieira replied: > I haven't investigated whether it's possible. Probably not. Konstantin: try

Re: [Development] Changing definition of Qt meta macro to allow tools integration

2016-03-31 Thread Knoll Lars
On 31/03/16 08:38, "Development on behalf of Olivier Goffart" wrote: >Am Mittwoch, 30. März 2016, 21:04:50 CEST schrieb Thiago Macieira: >> On quinta-feira, 31 de março de 2016 00:10:48 PDT Olivier

Re: [Development] QThreadStorage and C++11

2016-03-31 Thread Olivier Goffart
Am Mittwoch, 30. März 2016, 22:23:35 CEST schrieb Konstantin Tokarev: > Hello, > > Are there any plans to reimplement QThreadStorage via thread_local for > compilers which support it? QThreadStorage is already implemented with __thread which is a bit like thread_local before it existed.

Re: [Development] Nominating Volker Krause for Approver status

2016-03-31 Thread Sergio Martins
On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 09:34:40 AM Sean Harmer wrote: > Hi All, > > I'd like to nominate Volker Krause for approver status. Volker is one of the > main authors of GammaRay, is very active in the Qt Automotive sphere where > he leads up KDAB's contributions, and has touched many parts all

Re: [Development] gerrit : using branches (was: pointers to use it cleverly/efficiently?)

2016-03-31 Thread Jan Kundrát
On Wednesday, 30 March 2016 18:14:38 CEST, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: New UI is not required to use these features Inline editting is only available in 2.11, and the old change screen is gone in 2.11, too. Cheers, Jan -- Trojitá, a fast Qt IMAP e-mail client -- http://trojita.flaska.net/

[Development] qtwebkit fails to build

2016-03-31 Thread Partha Bagchi
I seem to have hit another snag. Hoping someone can point to a solution. In my build process, I am getting the following error: mingw32-make[2]: Entering directory 'Z:/src/kde/qt5/qtwebkit/Source/WebCore' ( test -e Makefile.WebCore.DerivedSources || Z:/src/kde/qt5/qtbase/bin/qmake.exe

Re: [Development] Changing definition of Qt meta macro to allow tools integration

2016-03-31 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 31 de março de 2016 08:01:54 PDT Knoll Lars wrote: > >Why would they need to deal with 5.6.0 specifically? > >As you said in another mail, 5.6 is LTS, not 5.6.0 > > I’m with Olivier here. We will not support 5.6.0 in three years anymore. > What we will support is 5.6.x (x being

Re: [Development] gerrit : using branches (was: pointers to use it cleverly/efficiently?)

2016-03-31 Thread René J . V . Bertin
Thiago Macieira wrote: > git diff misses the parent commit ID and the commit message. The output from > git format-patch has the commit message, but still misses the parent commit > ID. So? A system that accepts patches rather than commits will evidently need and provide a mechanism to enter at

Re: [Development] qtwebkit fails to build

2016-03-31 Thread Partha Bagchi
[image: Mic Drop] No suggestions at all? :( I am stuck here and without Webkit, I cannot build digikam. On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Partha Bagchi wrote: > I seem to have hit another snag. Hoping someone can point to a solution. > In my build process, I am getting the

[Development] Heads up! Fixing the build system on Windows

2016-03-31 Thread Tvete Paul
As you may know, Lars is leading an effort to modularize the build system. One of the big headaches we have is that Windows uses a completely separate configure.exe, leading to a lot of duplicated effort. With the latest announcement from Microsoft, everything changes. Now that bash is natively

Re: [Development] QThreadStorage and C++11

2016-03-31 Thread Milian Wolff
On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 10:23:35 PM CEST Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > Hello, > > Are there any plans to reimplement QThreadStorage via thread_local for > compilers which support it? Why not use thread_local _instead of_ QThreadStorage in user code, where applicable? -- Milian Wolff |

Re: [Development] Nominating Volker Krause for Approver status

2016-03-31 Thread Samuel Gaist
+1 On 30 mars 2016, at 10:34, Sean Harmer wrote: > Hi All, > > I'd like to nominate Volker Krause for approver status. Volker is one of the > main authors of GammaRay, is very active in the Qt Automotive sphere where he > leads up KDAB's contributions, and has touched many

Re: [Development] Nominating Volker Krause for Approver status

2016-03-31 Thread Frederik Gladhorn
On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 09:34:40 AM Sean Harmer wrote: > Hi All, > > I'd like to nominate Volker Krause for approver status. Volker is one of the > main authors of GammaRay, is very active in the Qt Automotive sphere where > he leads up KDAB's contributions, and has touched many parts all

Re: [Development] Heads up! Fixing the build system on Windows

2016-03-31 Thread Andrew Knight
I totally applaud the initiative. Should we go a step further, and make Windows 10 a requirement for building Qt for any platform? The OS ships on most new PCs, and cross-compilers and sysroots for other platform targets are pretty much ubiquitous nowadays. I realize there may be a slight

Re: [Development] Heads up! Fixing the build system on Windows

2016-03-31 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sexta-feira, 1 de abril de 2016 05:16:33 PDT Tvete Paul wrote: > The requirement for > Windows 10 should not be a problem, since the upgrade is free anyway. Oh, yes, it is. The problem is not the cost. The problem is the permission to use it. Many companies' IT departments are slow to

Re: [Development] Heads up! Fixing the build system on Windows

2016-03-31 Thread Thiago Macieira
I want to point this out: On quinta-feira, 31 de março de 2016 22:48:35 PDT Thiago Macieira wrote: > On sexta-feira, 1 de abril de 2016 05:16:33 PDT Tvete Paul wrote: It's still March 31st. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology