Hi!
somehow my previous mail didn't make it. So better late then never:
I'm happy to announce that Qt 4.8.4 has just been released.
See the blog on http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2012/11/29/qt-4-8-4-released/
and the changes file at http://qt.digia.com/Release-Notes/Release-Notes-Qt-484/
for
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 07:53:41AM +, Vladimir Minenko wrote:
After yesterdays release we are planning to bump the Qt 4 version to 4.8.5.
Guys, would it be a big problem to wait with this until the end of this week?
We are releasing the final NDK this week and a change in the version is
On Nov 29, 2012, at 10:47 AM, Jarkko Laitinen jlaiti...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I sent a message to this mailing list a while ago and got couple of
responses. I have developed QCloud, an API that enables integration of Amazon
S3 and Windows Azure to Qt applications. The project has been
Hello,
There are new packages available for testing on Linux and Mac. We're working on
Windows installer package.
http://releases.qt-project.org/digia/5.0.0_rc1/backups/2012-12-04-363/
Please feel free to test them. We will appreciate your feedback.
Known issues are to be found here:
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 04:29:24PM +, Knoll Lars wrote:
Dev is the branch where you can land anything that's supposed to go into 5.1.
The following policies apply:
Stable:
This branch will be the basis for Qt 5.0 and subsequent patch level releases.
The following policies apply
On 04.12.2012 12:28, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 04:29:24PM +, Knoll Lars wrote:
Dev is the branch where you can land anything that's supposed to go into
5.1. The following policies apply:
Stable:
This branch will be the basis for Qt 5.0 and subsequent patch level
On terça-feira, 4 de dezembro de 2012 11.56.39, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 07:53:41AM +, Vladimir Minenko wrote:
After yesterdays release we are planning to bump the Qt 4 version to
4.8.5.
Guys, would it be a big problem to wait with this until the end of this
On terça-feira, 4 de dezembro de 2012 10.21.55, Salomon, Florian wrote:
Hello everybody,
i needed to know if and when VNC-support is planed for Qt5?
What do you want supported?
Do you want to be able to see regular Qt applications when using a VNC server
on X? If so, that should be supported
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Konstantin Tokarev annu...@yandex.ruwrote:
There's no point in keeping separate branch purely for tags. It is just an
unnecessary overcomplication.
Actually, there is: it allows you to continue working in stabilization
branches, then discard those changes (i.
04.12.2012, 21:02, Pau Garcia i Quiles pgqui...@elpauer.org:
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Konstantin Tokarev annu...@yandex.ru wrote:
There's no point in keeping separate branch purely for tags. It is just an
unnecessary overcomplication.
Actually, there is: it allows you to continue
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Konstantin Tokarev annu...@yandex.ruwrote:
04.12.2012, 21:02, Pau Garcia i Quiles pgqui...@elpauer.org:
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Konstantin Tokarev annu...@yandex.ru
wrote:
There's no point in keeping separate branch purely for tags. It is just
an
It's not difficult to understand. For example, 4.8.4 was released, it means
v4.8.4 was taged. All later changes after that in 4.8 branch don't belong to
4.8.4. They must be part of next release of 4.8 branch, obviously it is 4.8.5.
So the version bumps to 4.8.5 should happen just after 4.8.4
I don't know what he meant, but I wondering if it makes sense to
create QPA plugin for VNC or rdesktop.
tr3w
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Thiago Macieira
thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On terça-feira, 4 de dezembro de 2012 10.21.55, Salomon, Florian wrote:
Hello everybody,
i needed to
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Thiago Macieira
thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
Here's a question to the project: do we want to merge (-s ours) the releases
from vendors into our official tree? And do we want their tags too?
Speaking with my Mer Project (/Jolla) hat on:
I don't think direct
14 matches
Mail list logo
