Re: [Development] Unsatisfied symbols for QAbstractOpenGLFunctions

2014-11-26 Thread Konstantin Ritt
class QAbstractOpenGLFunctions (note missing Q_GUI_EXPORT) Regards, Konstantin 2014-11-26 11:42 GMT+04:00 Christophe de Dinechin christo...@taodyne.com: I'm trying to adapt Tao3D (http://tao3d.sourceforge.net) to the new way of doing OpenGL on Qt. I run into unsatisfied symbols for

[Development] QML instantiation performance

2014-11-26 Thread Juha Vuolle
Hello, apologies for cross-posting. I find this such a fundamental issue that I feel at least having the best possible understanding of it worth it (if any exists, which is also a valuable information in itself). I am happy to help if there is anything I could check. thanks, Juha --- Hello,

Re: [Development] Dropping win32-mingw47 from the CI system, adding win32-mingw491 one

2014-11-26 Thread Blasche Alexander
Hi, I agree with Kai's assessment. The CI should use the same mingw version as the release system. To not let this task sit forever please speak up if you care about mingw 4.7.x rather than using 4.9.x going forward. No negative comment about the plan implies universal acceptance after one

Re: [Development] Unsatisfied symbols for QAbstractOpenGLFunctions

2014-11-26 Thread Christophe de Dinechin
On 26 Nov 2014, at 09:04, Konstantin Ritt ritt...@gmail.com wrote: class QAbstractOpenGLFunctions (note missing Q_GUI_EXPORT) Do you mean this is a bug, or that I'm using it wrong and it's not supposed to be visible in the library? If not, why is its destructor virtual (implying that the

Re: [Development] Unsatisfied symbols for QAbstractOpenGLFunctions

2014-11-26 Thread Sean Harmer
On Wednesday 26 Nov 2014 09:13:38 Christophe de Dinechin wrote: On 26 Nov 2014, at 09:04, Konstantin Ritt ritt...@gmail.com wrote: class QAbstractOpenGLFunctions (note missing Q_GUI_EXPORT) Do you mean this is a bug, or that I'm using it wrong and it's not supposed to be visible in

Re: [Development] Unsatisfied symbols for QAbstractOpenGLFunctions

2014-11-26 Thread Christophe de Dinechin
On 26 Nov 2014, at 09:46, Sean Harmer sean.har...@kdab.com wrote: On Wednesday 26 Nov 2014 09:13:38 Christophe de Dinechin wrote: On 26 Nov 2014, at 09:04, Konstantin Ritt ritt...@gmail.com wrote: class QAbstractOpenGLFunctions (note missing Q_GUI_EXPORT) Do you mean this is a bug, or

Re: [Development] Unsatisfied symbols for QAbstractOpenGLFunctions

2014-11-26 Thread Christophe de Dinechin
Try with a class that has a copy constructor or with a usage pattern that causes the compiler to generate a copy constructor. Which gives me a possible fix: in my TaoOpenGLFunctions, I can add a copy constructor that invokes the default constructor instead of the copy constructor. So I can

Re: [Development] Unsatisfied symbols for QAbstractOpenGLFunctions

2014-11-26 Thread Konstantin Ritt
struct OpenGLState : GraphicState { TaoOpenGLFunctions *funcs; ... } voi-la Regards, Konstantin 2014-11-26 13:15 GMT+04:00 Christophe de Dinechin christo...@taodyne.com: Try with a class that has a copy constructor or with a usage pattern that causes the compiler to generate a copy

[Development] Help needed to test Ministro 10.3, needed for Qt 5.4!

2014-11-26 Thread BogDan
Hello folks, I have some bad news about Ministro on Android 5.0. Due to a bug  https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=79478 introduced by Google in Android 5.0 final release apps that are using Ministro are not working anymore, on Android L preview it worked just fine. I hope in the

[Development] Qt 5.4.0 release coming soon

2014-11-26 Thread Heikkinen Jani
Hi all! Qt 5.4.0 release is coming soon. Target is to put RC out during this week (most probably tomorrow) and final 9th Dec 2014. Many changes files are still missing, try links from http://qt-project.org/wiki/Change-files-in-Qt-5.4.0. We need to get needed files in '5.4.0' branch as soon

Re: [Development] Help needed to test Ministro 10.3, needed for Qt 5.4!

2014-11-26 Thread Cristian Adam
Please star the android issue so that Google developers understand the severity of the problem. It's not like only six people are affected by this. Cheers, Cristian. On 26 Nov 2014 12:45, BogDan bog_dan...@yahoo.com wrote: Hello folks, I have some bad news about Ministro on Android 5.0. Due

[Development] Qt downloads now moved to qt.io

2014-11-26 Thread Kojo Tero
Hello, As part of the website updates, the download page on qt-project.org is now redirected to qt.io. You can read the details at the blog (which will also move to a qt.io address in the near future). http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2014/11/26/qt-downloads-moving-to-qt-io/ Best regards, Tero

Re: [Development] Unsatisfied symbols for QAbstractOpenGLFunctions

2014-11-26 Thread Christophe de Dinechin
On 26 Nov 2014, at 10:21, Konstantin Ritt ritt...@gmail.com wrote: struct OpenGLState : GraphicState { TaoOpenGLFunctions *funcs; ... } voi-la Nope: I don't inherit the GL functions that way, so I have to rewrite every glFoo as funcs-glFoo, which is double plus annoying. And then, there are

[Development] Clarification needed for Qt Script's future over QJSEngine/Value

2014-11-26 Thread N. N.
I was looking at using QtScript for a project and noticed that all work has been ABANDONED for using the new java script engine V8 as noted in http://qt-project.org/wiki/V8_Port and then pouring over other bug reports the mailing list about QtScript and how QtScript won't be updated to use a

Re: [Development] Clarification needed for Qt Script's future over QJSEngine/Value

2014-11-26 Thread Hausmann Simon
Hi, You are right, we need to add a few more features to QJSEngine. I'm not so much in favor of the default prototype for meta type api anymore, as it promotes the creation of slow conversion code I think. If you peek at my gerrit dashboard then you can see that I'm about 80% done with a

Re: [Development] Clarification needed for Qt Script's future over QJSEngine/Value

2014-11-26 Thread N. N.
On Wednesday, 26 November 2014, 14:15, Hausmann Simon simon.hausm...@theqtcompany.com wrote: Hi, You are right, we need to add a few more features to QJSEngine. I'm not so much in favor of the default prototype for meta type api anymore, as it promotes the creation of slow

Re: [Development] Qt 5.4.0 release coming soon

2014-11-26 Thread Adam Light
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:50 AM, Heikkinen Jani jani.heikki...@theqtcompany.com wrote: Hi all! Qt 5.4.0 release is coming soon. Target is to put RC out during this week (most probably tomorrow) and final 9th Dec 2014. Many changes files are still missing, try links from

Re: [Development] Qt 5.4.0 release coming soon

2014-11-26 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Wednesday 26 November 2014 12:33:52 Adam Light wrote: On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:50 AM, Heikkinen Jani jani.heikki...@theqtcompany.com wrote: Hi all! Qt 5.4.0 release is coming soon. Target is to put RC out during this week (most probably tomorrow) and final 9th Dec 2014.

Re: [Development] Clarification needed for Qt Script's future over QJSEngine/Value

2014-11-26 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Wednesday 26 November 2014 19:59:55 N. N. wrote: On Wednesday, 26 November 2014, 14:15, Hausmann Simon simon.hausm...@theqtcompany.com wrote: Hi, You are right, we need to add a few more features to QJSEngine. I'm not so much in favor of the default prototype for meta type api

Re: [Development] Qt 5.4.0 release coming soon

2014-11-26 Thread Adam Light
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote: On Wednesday 26 November 2014 12:33:52 Adam Light wrote: Where's the correct place to file a bug about a changelog entry being incorrect? Specifically, the bug # in the following entry doesn't seem to have

[Development] FOSDEM 2015

2014-11-26 Thread Pau Garcia i Quiles
Guys, Less than 10 days for the deadline for the Desktops DevRoom at FOSDEM 2015 and not a single Qt-related talk submited. I cannot really believe nobody has anything to say! Call for Talks: http://www.elpauer.org/2014/10/fosdem-2015-desktops-devroom-call-for-talks/ -- Pau Garcia i Quiles

Re: [Development] Qt 5.4.0 release coming soon

2014-11-26 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Wednesday 26 November 2014 15:54:35 Adam Light wrote: On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote: On Wednesday 26 November 2014 12:33:52 Adam Light wrote: Where's the correct place to file a bug about a changelog entry being incorrect?

Re: [Development] QML instantiation performance

2014-11-26 Thread Chris Adams
Hi Juha, For some more light on this issue, are you able to run the qtdeclarative/tests/benchmarks/qml/librarymetrics_performance benchmark on both 5.1 and 5.3 (you may have to backport to 5.1 as IIRC I made some changes to the way the components were instantiated for 5.2 before the benchmark was

Re: [Development] QML instantiation performance

2014-11-26 Thread Juha Vuolle
Hey Chris, Thanks heaps. I'll have a look and get back with any findings (may take a day or two before I get to it). cheers, Juha 2014-11-27 3:51 GMT+02:00 Chris Adams chris.ad...@qinetic.com.au: Hi Juha, For some more light on this issue, are you able to run the

Re: [Development] Help needed to test Ministro 10.3, needed for Qt 5.4!

2014-11-26 Thread BogDan
Hi, Well the bug-type is Defect and is still opened, so, we'll have to wait for the next version and see what happens. A similar problem I've had with Android 3.0, back them they've screwed .dex class loading, but they've fixed in the next version. Cheers, BogDan.