Re: [Development] Dictation Issues with Qt-built software

2016-11-14 Thread Robert Iakobashvili 
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Morten Sorvig  wrote:
>
>> On 4 Nov 2016, at 13:00, Robert Iakobashvili  wrote:
>>
>> Right. Most users of dictation are people with learning or motoric 
>> disabilities.
>>
>> When these users are used to a certain pattern of platform-specific habits
>> working for them, any other options to do the same could be seen as 
>> usability issues
>> breaking these habits.
>
>
> Hi, after some further investigation and offline discussion (thanks 
> Frederik!),
> I think we’re closer to solving this:
>
> Dictation input can be handled via our current input method support, where we
> implement the NSTextInputClient protocol. As a matter fact this almost works
> today (Qt 5.6): select text in a Qt text editor; starting dictation via the
> fn key should now work.
>
> So what we are looking at then is developing a bug fix to our 
> NSTextInputClient
> protocol implementation to make dictation work in all cases.
>
> Morten
>
Dear Morten,
Please, let me know when you have patches for 5.6.2.
I can apply them, rebuild and verify the fix for the common case.

Thanks!

Kind regards,
Robert
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Re: [Development] Nominating Antti Määttä as Qt3D approver

2016-11-14 Thread Pasi Keränen 
+1 from me as well.

Regards,
Pasi

On 14/11/16 17:19, "Development on behalf of Sean Harmer" 
 wrote:

On Monday 14 November 2016 15:15:16 Paul Lemire wrote:
> Hi
> 
> I would like to propose the nomination of Antti Määttä for approver 
status.
> Antti has been contributing many patches to Qt3D adding new features and
> providing bug fixes. In addition, having another approver would be a great
> help to reduce the amount of time patches are spent awaiting a review.

+1 from me.

Cheers,

Sean

___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development


___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Re: [Development] Nominating Antti Määttä as Qt3D approver

2016-11-14 Thread Sean Harmer 
On Monday 14 November 2016 15:15:16 Paul Lemire wrote:
> Hi
> 
> I would like to propose the nomination of Antti Määttä for approver status.
> Antti has been contributing many patches to Qt3D adding new features and
> providing bug fixes. In addition, having another approver would be a great
> help to reduce the amount of time patches are spent awaiting a review.

+1 from me.

Cheers,

Sean

___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

[Development] Nominating Antti Määttä as Qt3D approver

2016-11-14 Thread Paul Lemire 
Hi

I would like to propose the nomination of Antti Määttä for approver status.
Antti has been contributing many patches to Qt3D adding new features and 
providing bug fixes. In addition, having another approver would be a great help 
to reduce the amount of time patches are spent awaiting a review. 

Thanks,

Paul

-- 
Paul Lemire | paul.lem...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company
Tel: France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.fr
KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts

___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Re: [Development] [Releasing] Qt 5.8.0 API review

2016-11-14 Thread Lars Knoll 
Thanks,

Looks good once these two changes are integrated.

Cheers,
Lars

On 14/11/16 11:42, "Development on behalf of Sean Harmer" 
 wrote:

On Monday 14 November 2016 10:34:38 Sean Harmer wrote:
> On Monday 14 November 2016 09:37:21 Lars Knoll wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I went through all modules now, and added my comments. Mainly small
> > issues,
> > with the exception of Qt 3D, where I see some real BC breakages.
> > 
> > Sean, could you please look at
> > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/170642/ asap.
> 
> I'm just back from vacation today. Paul is taking a look now.

Fixes in 

https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/176569/
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/176570/

are integrating...

Cheers,

Sean

___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development


___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Re: [Development] [Releasing] Qt 5.8.0 API review

2016-11-14 Thread Sean Harmer 
On Monday 14 November 2016 10:34:38 Sean Harmer wrote:
> On Monday 14 November 2016 09:37:21 Lars Knoll wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I went through all modules now, and added my comments. Mainly small
> > issues,
> > with the exception of Qt 3D, where I see some real BC breakages.
> > 
> > Sean, could you please look at
> > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/170642/ asap.
> 
> I'm just back from vacation today. Paul is taking a look now.

Fixes in 

https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/176569/
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/176570/

are integrating...

Cheers,

Sean

___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Re: [Development] [Releasing] Qt 5.8.0 API review

2016-11-14 Thread Sean Harmer 
On Monday 14 November 2016 09:37:21 Lars Knoll wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I went through all modules now, and added my comments. Mainly small issues,
> with the exception of Qt 3D, where I see some real BC breakages.
> 
> Sean, could you please look at https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/170642/
> asap.

I'm just back from vacation today. Paul is taking a look now.

Cheers,

Sean

> 
> Thanks,
> Lars
> 
> On 14/11/16 09:44, "Jani Heikkinen"  wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> It seems this is still badly ongoing, only few '+1' and only one '+2'
> there :(
> 
> Please try to finalize the review during this week: We need to have
> reviews done & possible changes in '5.8' before we can start branching from
> '5.8' to '5.8.0'
> 
> br,
> Jani
> 
> 
> From: Edward Welbourne
> Sent: Monday, November 7, 2016 4:57 PM
> To: releas...@qt-project.org
> Cc: Jani Heikkinen; Sune Vuorela; development@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Releasing] Qt 5.8.0 API review
> 
> With the 5.8.0 release now close at hand, I've updated the API reviews:
> 
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/170634 - qtbase
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/170635 - qtdeclarative
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/170636 - qtactiveqt
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/170637 - qtmultimedia
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/170640 - qtconnectivity
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/170641 - qtwayland
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/170642 - qt3d
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/170643 - qtserialbus
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/170644 - qtserialport
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/170645 - qtandroidextras
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/170646 - qtwebsockets
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/170647 - qtwebengine
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/170648 - qtcanvas3d
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/170649 - qtcharts
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/170650 - qtdatavis3d
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/170652 - qtscxml
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/176059 - qtquickcontrols2
> 
> Note that, although Gerrit thinks of these as proposals to change 5.8,
> they are actually commits based on tag v5.7.0 showing what's changed in
> 5.8's API, with lots of boring bits filtered out.
> 
> It would be nice if some of these did in fact get reviewed ...
> 
> Eddy.
> ___
> Development mailing list
> Development@qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
> 
> 
> ___
> Development mailing list
> Development@qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

-- 
Dr Sean Harmer | sean.har...@kdab.com | Managing Director UK
KDAB (UK) Ltd, a KDAB Group company
Tel. +44 (0)1625 809908; Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090
Mobile: +44 (0)7545 140604
KDAB - Qt Experts
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

[Development] Heads up - 5.8 string freeze

2016-11-14 Thread Jani Heikkinen 
Hi all,

As warned a week ago string freeze is now in effect. Please, no changes to 
translatable strings from this point, unless approved by the documentation team.

Br,
Jani


From: Jani Heikkinen
Sent: Monday, November 7, 2016 3:06 PM
To: localizat...@qt-project.org
Subject: Heads up - 5.8 soft string freeze

Hi all,

Qt 5.8 beta is out & work towards final release continues. One step on the way 
is String Freeze which should happen really soon to be able to minimize time 
needed between beta and RC. So let's have the string freeze 14th Nov 2016.

Br,
Jani





___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Re: [Development] [Releasing] Qt 5.8.0 API review

2016-11-14 Thread Lars Knoll 
Hi,

I went through all modules now, and added my comments. Mainly small issues, 
with the exception of Qt 3D, where I see some real BC breakages.

Sean, could you please look at https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/170642/ 
asap.

Thanks,
Lars

On 14/11/16 09:44, "Jani Heikkinen"  wrote:

Hi all,

It seems this is still badly ongoing, only few '+1' and only one '+2' there 
:( 

Please try to finalize the review during this week: We need to have reviews 
done & possible changes in '5.8' before we can start branching from '5.8' to 
'5.8.0'

br,
Jani


From: Edward Welbourne
Sent: Monday, November 7, 2016 4:57 PM
To: releas...@qt-project.org
Cc: Jani Heikkinen; Sune Vuorela; development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Releasing] Qt 5.8.0 API review

With the 5.8.0 release now close at hand, I've updated the API reviews:

https://codereview.qt-project.org/170634 - qtbase
https://codereview.qt-project.org/170635 - qtdeclarative
https://codereview.qt-project.org/170636 - qtactiveqt
https://codereview.qt-project.org/170637 - qtmultimedia
https://codereview.qt-project.org/170640 - qtconnectivity
https://codereview.qt-project.org/170641 - qtwayland
https://codereview.qt-project.org/170642 - qt3d
https://codereview.qt-project.org/170643 - qtserialbus
https://codereview.qt-project.org/170644 - qtserialport
https://codereview.qt-project.org/170645 - qtandroidextras
https://codereview.qt-project.org/170646 - qtwebsockets
https://codereview.qt-project.org/170647 - qtwebengine
https://codereview.qt-project.org/170648 - qtcanvas3d
https://codereview.qt-project.org/170649 - qtcharts
https://codereview.qt-project.org/170650 - qtdatavis3d
https://codereview.qt-project.org/170652 - qtscxml
https://codereview.qt-project.org/176059 - qtquickcontrols2

Note that, although Gerrit thinks of these as proposals to change 5.8,
they are actually commits based on tag v5.7.0 showing what's changed in
5.8's API, with lots of boring bits filtered out.

It would be nice if some of these did in fact get reviewed ...

Eddy.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development


___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Re: [Development] [Releasing] Qt 5.8.0 API review

2016-11-14 Thread Jani Heikkinen 
Hi all,

It seems this is still badly ongoing, only few '+1' and only one '+2' there :( 

Please try to finalize the review during this week: We need to have reviews 
done & possible changes in '5.8' before we can start branching from '5.8' to 
'5.8.0'

br,
Jani


From: Edward Welbourne
Sent: Monday, November 7, 2016 4:57 PM
To: releas...@qt-project.org
Cc: Jani Heikkinen; Sune Vuorela; development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Releasing] Qt 5.8.0 API review

With the 5.8.0 release now close at hand, I've updated the API reviews:

https://codereview.qt-project.org/170634 - qtbase
https://codereview.qt-project.org/170635 - qtdeclarative
https://codereview.qt-project.org/170636 - qtactiveqt
https://codereview.qt-project.org/170637 - qtmultimedia
https://codereview.qt-project.org/170640 - qtconnectivity
https://codereview.qt-project.org/170641 - qtwayland
https://codereview.qt-project.org/170642 - qt3d
https://codereview.qt-project.org/170643 - qtserialbus
https://codereview.qt-project.org/170644 - qtserialport
https://codereview.qt-project.org/170645 - qtandroidextras
https://codereview.qt-project.org/170646 - qtwebsockets
https://codereview.qt-project.org/170647 - qtwebengine
https://codereview.qt-project.org/170648 - qtcanvas3d
https://codereview.qt-project.org/170649 - qtcharts
https://codereview.qt-project.org/170650 - qtdatavis3d
https://codereview.qt-project.org/170652 - qtscxml
https://codereview.qt-project.org/176059 - qtquickcontrols2

Note that, although Gerrit thinks of these as proposals to change 5.8,
they are actually commits based on tag v5.7.0 showing what's changed in
5.8's API, with lots of boring bits filtered out.

It would be nice if some of these did in fact get reviewed ...

Eddy.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development