Hi,
On 08/08/2017 17:56, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
On Dienstag, 8. August 2017 10:41:02 CEST Jani Heikkinen wrote:
Hi all,
We should have FF & branching today. Unfortunately we are still fighting
with some issues in qt5.git integration in 'dev' . That's why we haven't
been able to start sof
On Tuesday, 8 August 2017 08:49:36 PDT Edward Welbourne wrote:
> Thiago Macieira (7 August 2017 06:14)
>
> > ... there are bigger problems with the implementation, starting with
> > QAbstractCalendar having a static protected QMap member.
>
> That's my fault. We're going to need some way for QML
On Dienstag, 8. August 2017 10:41:02 CEST Jani Heikkinen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We should have FF & branching today. Unfortunately we are still fighting
> with some issues in qt5.git integration in 'dev' . That's why we haven't
> been able to start soft branching yet :( But that doesn't mean we will
Thiago Macieira (7 August 2017 06:14)
> ... there are bigger problems with the implementation, starting with
> QAbstractCalendar having a static protected QMap member.
That's my fault. We're going to need some way for QML/V4 to get at
calendars; and I want to ensure our design leaves scope for cl
The dev merge went in, too, so qtbase dev is working again as well. Thanks
everyone :)
Simon
From: Development on
behalf of Simon Hausmann
Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2017 9:40:33 AM
To: Thiago Macieira; development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] S
Hi,
I think that's a good idea, although I prefer the approach of making the test
adapt the expected output relative to the current time instead of replacing the
library state with mock data.
Simon
From: Development on
behalf of Morten Sørvig
Sent: Tuesd
Thanks for cleaning this up quickly!
When it comes to testing, do we want to go one step further and
make the tests be completely independent of the current time? We would
like to avoid time bombs like these, and if something _is_ going to
fail at some future date we would like to know so right a
Hi all,
We should have FF & branching today. Unfortunately we are still fighting with
some issues in qt5.git integration in 'dev' . That's why we haven't been able
to start soft branching yet :( But that doesn't mean we will officially delay
the FF ;)
So let's freeze new features for Qt 5.10 t
Thank you Thiago, Sergio and Lars!
qtbase 5.6 and 5.9 are good again.
Simon
From: Development on
behalf of Thiago Macieira
Sent: Monday, August 7, 2017 10:54:22 PM
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] State of 5.9 and dev branches
On M
