The basic question: does it mean moving any public class / function from one
lib into another? If so, how do you want to resolve the BC issue, especially on
Win?
Jarek
From: Development on behalf of Marc Mutz
via Development
Sent: Monday, May 6, 2024
ha scritto:
>> Il 15/03/24 19:17, Jaroslaw Kobus via Development ha scritto:
>>> +1. Typically, the designer of a subclass knows what he is doing. But it
>>>also happens that users of this class know better how to use it :)
>> I'm not sure what this means.
>>
> From: Development on behalf of Thiago
> Macieira
> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2024 7:03 PM
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] Should QObject::event() be protected or public?
>
> On Friday, 15 March 2024 10:09:31 PDT Marc Mutz via Development wrote:
>> I like simple
Most probably making it protected (temporarily) and trying to build everything
else (including QtCreator) may reveal the original reason for being public.
Jarek
From: Development on behalf of Marc Mutz
via Development
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2024
https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt-creator/qt-creator.git/tree/src/libs/utils/filesearch.h
FileContainer & FileContainerIterator could be an inspiration, too.
The SubDirFileContainer enables traversal according to the selected filters and
exclusion filters.
This all is a part of the Utils lib inside
machine) doesn't like the
https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt-creator/qt-creator/+/480663
> > 3. Despite of how 1. and 2. will be proceeded, I think we should clearly
> > document it. It's really not obvious that Qt users can't rely on the proper
> > order of timeouts.
[Re-sending my reply to Thiago to the mailing list, as I think it may be
possibly interesting for more people.]
[In meantime I've created
https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/480703 and waiting for CI
results.]
> On Monday, 29 May 2023 11:40:14 PDT Jaroslaw Kobus via Developm
Hi All,
when I start 2 single shot timers synchronously in a row, with exactly the same
interval, from the same thread, can I rely on having their handlers called in
the same order in which they were started?
I.e.:
QTimer::singleShot(1000, [] { qDebug() << "1st timer elapsed"; });
> - drop the requirement for () in lambdas
>
> Rationale: this was a word-around for older MSVCs. The standard doesn't
> require the empty parameter list (except when adorning the lambda with
> noexcept etc, and then the compiler complains) and people have voted
> with their feet: we now have
>> On 4 May 2023, at 17:34, Marc Mutz via Development
>> wrote:
>>
>> On 04.05.23 15:38, Volker Hilsheimer via Development wrote:
>>> Should we have Qt::TextLayout::Horizontal and Qt::Layout::Horizontal? Or
>>> QSlider::Orientation::Horizontal?
>>
>> Without looking at the docs, tell me what
"enum class" has one advantage over "enum" inside a "class" : you may forward
declare the "enum class", while the other not. That's quite often case that
your header must include the other header just because you use the "enum" in
"class" in your API and nothing more.
Jarek
+1
Good job, Marcus!
Jarek
From: Development on behalf of Cristian
Adam via Development
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2022 10:39 PM
To: A. Pönitz; development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] Nominating Marcus Tillmanns as Approver
+1
Cheers,
> 1. Use overloads for methods that take views or spans. In new API we can
> omit the methods that take owning containers. If the overload set grows
> out of hand, don't add the view/span alternative until we can remove
> something. By Thiago's argument, that means not to convert existing
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
