On 8 January 2016 at 07:18, Turunen Tuukka
wrote:
>
>
> Hi John,
>
>
>
> This item was discussed at Qt Contributor’s Summit, please see session
> notes: http://wiki.qt.io/QtCS2015_LTS
>
>
>
> For compilers this is also documented to the Qt Base change log:
>
Hi,
Can I just clarify what the minimum deployment platforms are for 5.7
onwards? That is, the lowest version of each OS that the code must still
run on? Far as I can tell it's something like:
Windows 7 (or Vista?)
Windows Embedded Compact 2013
OSX 10.8
iOS 5.0?
Android 4.1 (API Level 16)?
RHEL
On 3 November 2015 at 14:28, Welbourne Edward <
edward.welbou...@theqtcompany.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm looking into QTBUG-49008 and need to work out how diverse
> implementations of mktime handle DST transitions: at one end of the year
> there's a gap (where 1:59 is followed by 3:00), at the
[Reply to list this time...]
This could work, as Qt::LocalTime / Qt::UTC / Qt::OffsetFromUtc don't
actually create or use QTimeZone for anything (at least not yet,
LocalTime may yet). I'm assuming dates outside the 1970-4207 year
range would still use the d_ptr implementation, as would anything
. And it seems
I'm
not alone [fedbug].
I searched the web and it seems the work on this has stoped. Does anyone
knows the state for this?
Thanks in advance, Lisandro.
[debbug] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=788108
[fedbug]
John Layt started working on a Geoclue 2 plugin
On 18 June 2014 07:15, Knoll Lars lars.kn...@digia.com wrote:
On 17/06/14 18:31, Robert Löhning robert.loehn...@digia.com wrote:
By the way: What will happen to bug reports from now closed identities?
The reporter won't get any notification and I'm afraid the watchers
won't feel addressed by the
On 17 June 2014 03:29, Christian Gagneraud chg...@gna.org wrote:
On 14/06/14 05:06, John Layt wrote:
While a lot is dependent on me finding
time, there are tasks other people could take on, primarily greatly
improving our PDF writer support and adding equivalent XPS file format
support
Em sex 13 jun 2014, às 10:21:08, Massimo Callegari escreveu:
I've added QT_NO_PRINTER and QT_NO_PRINTDIALOG to my qmake.conf
Qt5 base 5.3.0 still builds fine. libQt5PrintSupport is still created but
it's only 43k now. Unfortunately QtWebKit doesn't seem to change in size (I
guess cause the
Hi,
The notes form the QtPrintSupport session are available at
https://qt-project.org/groups/qt-contributors-summit-2014/wiki/QtPrintSupport
. Basically it's a long list of all the work needing to be done to
finish the new print library. While a lot is dependent on me finding
time, there are
On 30 April 2014 16:28, Andrey Ponomarenko aponomare...@rosalab.ru wrote:
ABI report for 5.3.0-rc:
http://upstream-tracker.org/compat_reports/qt/5.2.1_to_5.3.0-rc/abi_compat_report.html
Hi,
Interesting that it reports a Medium severity problem for:
qpagedpaintdevice.h
enum
: Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) zeesha...@gnome.org
Date: 2 April 2014 17:00
Subject: Proposal: Location hackfest
To: John Layt jl...@kde.org, Aaron McCarthy
aaron.mccar...@jollamobile.com, Hanno Schlichting hschlicht...@mozilla.com
Cc: Bastien Nocera had...@hadess.net, Ekaterina Gerasimova
kittykat3
Hi,
Bug report https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-38023 is a
release blocker as it causes an immediate crash in any Mac app using
printing when run as an app bundle on OSX 10.9 Mavericks. It does not
crash if the binary is run directly from the command line in 10.9, nor does
it crash
Hi,
I've been doing a bug triage for printing to see what I can close due
to the new code, and what high priority issues still need fixing.
I've grouped all 177 bugs by linking them to Tasks:
QTBUG-37696 QtPrintSupport - Bug Triage
QTBUG-25372 QtPrintSupport - CUPS Issues
QTBUG-25383
On 13 March 2014 10:06, Sarajärvi Tony tony.saraja...@digia.com wrote:
Hi
No ETA. There are quite a few problems in the autotest side. Just a minute
ago the last try failed. Have to fix more...
-Tony
Thanks Tony. I guess we won't have it back now before Friday? Just
getting a little
On 13 March 2014 18:08, Frederik Gladhorn frederik.gladh...@digia.com wrote:
Torsdag 13. mars 2014 16.32.22 skrev John Layt:
On 13 March 2014 10:06, Sarajärvi Tony tony.saraja...@digia.com wrote:
Hi
No ETA. There are quite a few problems in the autotest side. Just a minute
ago the last
On 13 March 2014 18:21, John Layt jl...@kde.org wrote:
On 13 March 2014 18:08, Frederik Gladhorn frederik.gladh...@digia.com wrote:
Looks like we're somewhat back on track. We got a first run for qtbase
passing
and hopefully start getting the backlog down. Thanks for bearing with us
On 12 March 2014 11:08, Sarajärvi Tony tony.saraja...@digia.com wrote:
Hi
Currently we are blocking QtBase_dev and qt4. We need to get a fix for an
autotest through so that any commit will have a chance to pass the CI.
Also, you might have noticed a few problems in the CI with breaking
Hi,
[Mostly notes for Andy Shaw to review, but thought I'd post for anyone
interested]
In QtPrintSupport you can set the resolution to be used in printing, but as
with many parts of painting and printing there is confusion and inconsistency
between the painting resolution and the physical
On Wednesday 12 Feb 2014 15:37:29 John Layt wrote:
On Wednesday 12 Feb 2014 12:03:53 John Layt wrote:
Sorry, needed to wait until the full stack of changes had been completed
and integrated before pushing. The revised patches are up for review, I'm
not sure we'll get it done in time
On 17 February 2014 14:04, Knoll Lars lars.kn...@digia.com wrote:
I¹ve been discussing a bit with Friedemann and Andy on IRC, and I¹m
willing to give this change set an exception to the feature freeze. The
reason is that I believe that this significantly improves our level of
support in this
On Monday 10 Feb 2014 17:07:11 Shaw Andy wrote:
Since the feature freeze is on the 14th I have been eagerly awaiting the
changes that have been indicated already have been done so I can carry on
testing. Have I missed some updates or something? I am concerned because I
know how many people
On Wednesday 12 Feb 2014 12:03:53 John Layt wrote:
On Monday 10 Feb 2014 17:07:11 Shaw Andy wrote:
Since the feature freeze is on the 14th I have been eagerly awaiting the
changes that have been indicated already have been done so I can carry on
testing. Have I missed some updates
Hi,
I've seeing contradictory advice on Gerrit as to which branch to push bug-
fixes to, some say there will be no 5.2.2 so to use dev instead, others say to
keep using stable in case there is. What is the current official policy?
Oh, and please remember when making such decisions to clearly
On Monday 06 Jan 2014 22:40:44 you wrote:
My aims for the 5.3 release will be to
* Define the new qpa print device api and implement support for the 3
core platforms
* Use this new class in QPrinterInfo and QPrintEngine to replace the
current print device code, ensuring behaviour is
Hi,
I've spent the last few weeks going over the current print support and
trying to map out a plan to improve things. We've long intended to
create a new QtPrint module to replace QtPrintSupport in which we
separate the painting code from the print job management code and
support a more modern
On 10 December 2013 16:29, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
John has one point: he could remove the fallback code for the timezone
support.
Not for QTimeZone, the Vista stuff only extends the XP support, it
doesn't replace it. For QLocale and QCollator we could remove
fallback
Hi,
I'm refactoring the CUPS printing code (more on that in another email)
and noticed we don't currently have a minimum required version set,
i.e. we're currently restricted to the 1.0 api released in 1999. CUPS
is now at 1.7. There's some nicer api I'd like to use from 1.2 and
1.4, so for Qt
On 9 December 2013 23:23, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
As Kenneth reminds us[1], Microsoft is ending the security updates for Windows
XP in April 2014. That's about when we plan to release Qt 5.3.
Should we stop supporting Windows XP? Is there anything we can improve in our
Hi,
I've pushed 4 fixes for QTimeZone to the release branch for review for
inclusion in 5.0:
1) https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,70984
Rather embarrassingly I misspelt the name Olson as Olsen, including in new
public api for 5.2. This patch fixes the public api and docs, but doesn't
On 9 November 2013 12:50, Olivier Goffart oliv...@woboq.com wrote:
On Saturday 09 November 2013 03:02:18 Alessandro Portale wrote:
I like the idea of re-starting small, and quite a bit of what was done
in Nokia times can certainly be re-used.
What if Qt started by simply *enabling* color
On 5 November 2013 05:09, Yuchen Deng loa...@gmail.com wrote:
The ICU dependency is very heavy, I did not like it.
Is there any possible to make the ICU depend is optional?
Thanks!
Sorry, it is not possible to remove the dependency, all you can do is
to reduce the size of ICU by not shipping
On 5 November 2013 12:03, Marc Mutz marc.m...@kdab.com wrote:
On Tuesday, November 05, 2013 01:07:32 Thiago Macieira wrote:
+// ### Qt 6: Merge with above with default offsetSeconds = 0
+QDateTime(const QDate date, const QTime time, Qt::TimeSpec spec, int
offsetSeconds);
+#ifndef
Hi,
Just wondering if anyone knows about the state of Solaris support in
Qt 5, or if anyone is actively working on it? Over in KDE we're
ripping out some time zone code that currently supports Solaris and I
was wondering if I needed to add Solaris tz support in Qt 5? If Qt 5
doesn't even build
On 2 November 2013 16:52, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On sábado, 2 de novembro de 2013 13:06:43, John Layt wrote:
Hi,
Just wondering if anyone knows about the state of Solaris support in
Qt 5, or if anyone is actively working on it? Over in KDE we're
ripping out some
On 25 October 2013 15:55, Ramakanthreddy Kesireddy
ramakanthreddy.kesire...@techmahindra.com wrote:
Hi,
Please let me know if there is a plan to enable support for offline
Navigation and Map in QtLocation module.
Thanks and Regards,
Ramakanth
Until QtLocation does offer offline maps and
On 22 October 2013 15:33, Vladimir Minenko vmine...@blackberry.com wrote:
The purpose of this email is not to point out something what is not done or
wrong. The purpose of this email to initiate a discussion and a work to get
this done and create a clear definition where Qt runs on and how
On 17 October 2013 19:30, qt...@madagon.com wrote:
finally, I'm going to update date time classes to support world calendar
types while keeping the binary compatibility.
here's an overview of the new changes to be done at this level. Please
review and let me know if something wrong.
On 22 August 2013 21:24, John Layt jl...@kde.org wrote:
Hi,
Qt Dev Days Europe is coming up on October 7-9 and once again this
year KDE e.V. is partnering with Digia, KDAB and ICS in the running of
the event. In particular KDE is once again helping organise a Qt
Contributors Day on Monday
On Saturday 14 Sep 2013 17:11:50 John Layt wrote:
As I said, I'm testing a speed-up for toMSecsSinceEpoch() which makes it
faster than the old version, which feeds through to most of the other slower
functions. I'll also have a look at date() and time() for improvements
which will also
Hi,
I'm trying to do a clean build on Mac of current dev branch, but I
keep getting the error:
fatal error: file
'/Users/odysseus/Development/Qt/src/qt5/qtbase/src/corelib/../../include/QtCore/qglobal.h'
has been modified since the precompiled header was built.
Any clues on how to fix that
On Saturday 14 Sep 2013 03:04:45 John Layt wrote:
* Rather strangely timeSpec() is 30% slower despite now only returning the
member directly instead of having to do a switch based on the member, a few
other calls are equally confusing.
Ah, stupid me, I was including the creation in the timings
On Thursday 12 Sep 2013 19:24:15 Knoll Lars wrote:
On 9/12/13 9:06 PM, John Layt jl...@kde.org wrote:
The first is it means creating a QDateTime becomes a
lot slower as we need to calculate the epoch offset up-front, instead of
only when/if needed.
We might be able to simply cache the time
On Thursday 12 Sep 2013 22:24:40 Robin Burchell wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Knoll Lars lars.kn...@digia.com wrote:
We might be able to simply cache the time zone offset once and cache it.
Then it should be at the same speed.
This would also probably provide hidden wins in
On Thursday 12 Sep 2013 13:48:24 Thiago Macieira wrote:
On quinta-feira, 12 de setembro de 2013 21:06:03, John Layt wrote:
* Choose either local msecs or epoch msecs, if epoch then that change
can't
be done for 5.2
Choose the easiest for you to implement. We're running out of time, so
Hi,
Another QDateTime email. I'm still trying to get a fully working
reimplementation of QDateTime as well as the QTimeZone support in for 5.2, but
there's a couple of issues outstanding.
Storage format / Change of System Time Zone behaviour: My current changes on
Gerrit for storing as
-developer-buildOn 4 September 2013 15:21, Poenitz Andre
andre.poen...@digia.com wrote:
That's wasting our time, as predicted.
../../corelib/tools/qdatetime.cpp: In function 'time_t qt_mktime(QDate*,
QTime*, QDateTimePrivate::Spec*, QString*, bool*)':
On 20 August 2013 08:41, Koehne Kai kai.koe...@digia.com wrote:
Is there any way to avoid the ICU dependency in QtCore while still building
QtWebKit with it?
That would be part of the discussed changes, but it's not there yet.
For Qt 5.x, I suggest you configure Qt with '-no-icu', and then
On 27 March 2013 20:11, John Layt jl...@kde.org wrote:
On 26 March 2013 18:15, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On terça-feira, 26 de março de 2013 14.07.56, Sergio Ahumada wrote:
As far as I understand, the CI is all in Finland, so GMT +2.
In other words, the tests
On 26 March 2013 18:15, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On terça-feira, 26 de março de 2013 14.07.56, Sergio Ahumada wrote:
As far as I understand, the CI is all in Finland, so GMT +2.
In other words, the tests are effectively disabled.
Yeap, and on all platforms too. I
Hi,
I've just pushed another set of patches for the QTimeZone and QDateTime
changes. The current status is I think the code is now stable enough for a
final review and decision on whether to include in 5.1 or not.
The QDateTime changes for OffsetFromUTC and the formatter improvements can
Hi,
I've finally pushed my proposed QTimeZone support to Gerrit for initial review
for possible inclusion in 5.1.
The reviews are:
QLocale - Add private countryToCode() method
https://codereview.qt-project.org/50064
QDateTime - Improve and expose Qt::OffsetFromUtc
On Thursday 07 Mar 2013 16:16:05 Koehne Kai wrote:
On 02/06/2013 11:20 PM, Koehne Kai wrote:
[...]
That is what we should do indeed. I learned from
http://userguide.icu-project.org/icudata
that one can also ship the ICU data in separate .data files, located in
a ICU
On Wednesday 27 Feb 2013 13:49:48 Thiago Macieira wrote:
On quarta-feira, 27 de fevereiro de 2013 20.57.22, John Layt wrote:
Currently is now dropped, we'll wait and see if there's any demand later.
It would actually be isDaylightTime(QDateTime::currentMSecsSinceEpoch()).
Then please
On Tuesday 26 Feb 2013 16:12:07 Thiago Macieira wrote:
On terça-feira, 26 de fevereiro de 2013 22.42.31, John Layt wrote:
I'm struggling to think of something different, I can only think of uglies
like UnspecifiedTime, NonspecificTime or NotStandardTimeOrDaylightTime.
We can't use
On Wednesday 27 Feb 2013 10:26:51 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 04:12:07PM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On terça-feira, 26 de fevereiro de 2013 22.42.31, John Layt wrote:
On Wednesday 20 Feb 2013 16:16:55 Thiago Macieira wrote:
For 12 commits, I'd just submit
On Wednesday 20 Feb 2013 16:16:55 Thiago Macieira wrote:
For 12 commits, I'd just submit straight to dev.
Would you prefer it squashed to one big commit, or keep the platform backends
separate commits?
Except as noted below all other suggested changes are being made.
- GenericTime and
On 14 February 2013 19:21, Lorn Potter lorn.pot...@gmail.com wrote:
Back long ago
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-71
(feel free to assign that one to yourself!)
:)
Will do :-)
I was working on porting qtopia's timezone class to qt.
I added full windows olsen conversion.
On Wednesday 13 Feb 2013 08:49:56 Knoll Lars wrote:
The detailed timeline will be as follows:
* Friday 22. February: If you have a larger feature/feature branch (not
yet merged) that you want to have in the release you must have told the
release team (by mail to releases@) by then.
*
On 13 February 2013 15:13, Koehne Kai kai.koe...@digia.com wrote:
Which parts of the ICU data are you using (from
http://apps.icu-project.org/datacustom/ ) ?
I'd really like us to strip down the default ICU libs on windows for 5.1 ...
Good question. I think the following under
On 13 February 2013 18:37, John Layt jl...@kde.org wrote:
supplementalData.res
timezoneTypes.res
windowsZones.res
zone/*.res
Oh, also looks like:
metaZones.res
zoneinfo64.res
I wish ICU wrote better documentation :-)
John
On Friday 11 Jan 2013 13:32:35 Shaw Andy wrote:
Since ICU doesn't provide the debug version of the libraries in their binary
packages then this means that either the user has to build them themselves
(which means modifying the target as well since the output for debug and
release defaults to
On 2 August 2012 13:26, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On quinta-feira, 2 de agosto de 2012 12.02.45, lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
I intend to move both Qt 3D and Qt Location out of the essentials list and
make them add-ons for now. They are fully usable as-is today, but with
On 1 August 2012 04:00, lorn.pot...@nokia.com wrote:
Hi all,
We have received word that the Brisbane Australia office, consisting of the
teams working on Qt3D, QtDeclarative, QtMultimedia, QtSensors, and QtSystems
modules, as well as the CI/QA team for Qt, will be shut down. Our last day
On 1 August 2012 17:56, Olivier Goffart oliv...@woboq.com wrote:
On Wednesday 01 August 2012 18:37:14 Stephen Kelly wrote:
Given that https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,31387 has been merged,
can you post any more information that will last until the QColorProfile
class can be
On 4 July 2012 07:03, gunnar.sle...@nokia.com wrote:
While on the topic, if we move the widgets, we should also move
libQtPrintSupport and libQtOpenGL to their own repositories.
That would be nice, but I don't think QtPrintSupport can go as yet as
the Mac plugin implementation is actually in
Firstly, apologies for missing Day 1 of QtCS, production issues at work
prevented me from attending, but I am now on my way for the rest of the
event. I hope to run two sessions on either Friday or Saturday, one on
Printing, and the other on using ICU in QLocale, which will include plans
for
On 16 June 2012 08:35, song.7@nokia.com wrote:
Thanks… Also do you know how to configure and build the qtpim module along
with qtbase ?
If you follow the instructions at
http://qt-project.org/wiki/Building-Qt-5-from-Git there is a script
that does it all for you.
John.
On Wednesday 16 May 2012 23:49:42 John Layt wrote:
Actually removing the abstract base class is just a case of
s/QAbstractPrintDialog/QPrintDialog and tweaking the constructors, as the
class is not really abstract, the only virtual method is exec(), nothing
else gets reimplemented
On Wednesday 16 May 2012 10:14:27 Thiago Macieira wrote:
On quarta-feira, 16 de maio de 2012 00.07.10, John Layt wrote:
The QAbstractPritnDialog and QAbstractPageSetupDialog classes are
completely unnecessary, are given as bad examples in the Qt API design
standards, and were marked
Hi,
I want to request a late source incompatible change in QtPrintSupport.
The QAbstractPritnDialog and QAbstractPageSetupDialog classes are completely
unnecessary, are given as bad examples in the Qt API design standards, and
were marked to be merged with QPrintDialog and QPageSetupDialog in
On Thursday 03 May 2012 20:50:44 Christoph Schleifenbaum wrote:
3 maj 2012 kl. 12:30 skrev Christoph Schleifenbaum:
3 maj 2012 kl. 11:47 skrev Sean Harmer:
On Tuesday 01 May 2012 23:21:50 John Layt wrote:
snip
I've been testing the Mac printing and unfortunately hit a couple
On Monday 30 Apr 2012 09:06:28 morten.sor...@nokia.com wrote:
That would be not possible. QtGui and Widgets loads the Cocoa backend as a
plugin and does not link agains it.
I think the only options are either duplicating the neccesary code to
support QCoreGraphicsPaintEngine in printsupport,
On Monday 23 Apr 2012 22:17:15 John Layt wrote:
For Mac I propose moving QCocoaPrinterSupport into
plugins/printsupport/cocoa and moving the private methods from
QCocoaNativeInterface to
QCocoaPrinterSupportPlugin. I'll do a patch.
A harder question is where QMacPrintEngine should
Hi,
While starting to review the current state of QtPrintSupport for Beta 1 and
one thing I've immediately noticed is an inconsistency in the platform
implementations as to which plugins have which classes where.
OSX:
src/plugins/platforms/cocoa- QMacPrintEngine
Hi,
QTBUG-24543 reports that the tst_QLocale::windowsDefaultLocale() test is
broken and is currently being skipped.
I've determined this is because the Qt4 mechanism for triggering a refresh of
the Qt system locale whenever the system locale is changed has been removed
from
Hi,
In the QLocale header we have the following code:
//private:
// this should be private, but can't be
struct Data {
quint16 index;
quint16 numberOptions;
};
private:
friend struct QLocalePrivate;
// ### We now use this field
On Friday 17 Feb 2012 15:28:49 Francesco R. wrote:
Could you (as somebody involved in qt5 planning or development) clarify
what the plan are for printing functionality, managment or whatever?
Hi Francesco,
I'm the new community maintainer for printing support in Qt, so I can fill you
in on
On Sunday 05 Feb 2012 14:12:48 lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
Is there anything that I have now forgotten that really *must* be in 5.0
(i.e. it really can't be done in a BC/SC way for Qt 5.1)? If you have such
an item, please speak up, otherwise I'll consider the above exception list
as final.
On Wednesday 18 Jan 2012 13:21:24 lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
On 1/18/12 12:35 PM, ext Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com
On Wednesday, 18 de January de 2012 00.47.31, John Layt wrote:
Other classes call public QLocale methods for number symbols like
decimalPoint() and negativeSign
On Monday 16 Jan 2012 23:13:39 Thiago Macieira wrote:
I'd say that QLocale should return the information you need. If you need to
display that, why shouldn't QLocale provide that info?
*Setting* the info is, however, out-of-scope for Qt.
When I was discussing it with Denis at QtCS he was
Splitting up some related issues into separate emails to make it easier for
people to address.
Which ICU version to use?
The latest ICU version is 4.8. See See http://site.icu-project.org/download
for detailed release notes.
OS X 10.6 shipped with ICU 4.0.
The earliest versios of major
On Sunday 15 Jan 2012 22:53:31 Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Sunday, 15 de January de 2012 23.09.35, John Layt wrote:
* A QCldrLocale is not really needed for Qt purposes, it's only needed
for anyone who wants to know what individual settings are, like KDE
What would this class provide
On Sunday 15 Jan 2012 19:04:09 John Layt wrote:
I think I'm favouring the second option as being cleaner and easier to
implement in phases.
After reading more of the ICU number API and trying some things out, I now
think sticking closer to the current model will actually match the ICU API
On Monday 31 Oct 2011 09:37:18 Giovanni Bajo wrote:
Hi John,
thank you very much for accepting to be the printer maintainer.
Last year, we (Develer) proposed a patch that was rejected:
http://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qt/merge_requests/733
We then opened a bug to discuss an alternative API to
84 matches
Mail list logo