Thanks for all your input. I'll have a look at QUIP-6 and a closer
look at the implementation.
2018-07-10 23:55 GMT+02:00 Thiago Macieira :
> On Tuesday, 10 July 2018 12:31:30 PDT Lorenz Haas wrote:
>> So I wonder if there is any technical/intentional reason why there is
>> no ti
Hi André,
you are right. My statement was not precise enough: Adding a parameter
to the existing function would be BiC, adding an overload "void
QFutureWatcher::waitForFinished(int timeout);" is BC but would be SiC
because it makes function pointers ambiguous - at least I think so.
About the
Hi,
today I wished QFuture::waitForFinished() had a timeout parameter.
After a brief look waitForFinished() uses a QWaitCondition::wait()
internally, which already provides an optional timeout parameter.
So I wonder if there is any technical/intentional reason why there is
no timeout parameter?
Hi,
AFAIS it does not matter if sqlite is thread safe or not. The problem is
that QSQLiteDriver itself is not thread safe. For example if two threads
call beginTransaction() on the same driver and the "COMMIT" fails, both
threads will call QSqlDriver::setLastError() which does "d->error =
Hi,
> The style disabled any re-wraping of the comments, because the qdoc rules are
> not encoded in clang-format. So comments will not be touched.
just for the record: clang-format can exclude specific comment types
from re-wrapping. Thus if you/we do not mind a "either re-wrap all
comments or
2015-07-23 13:20 GMT+02:00 Marc Mutz marc.m...@kdab.com:
It's undocumented, and considered private, but since it's a template and thus
must be visible, it effectively is public API and falls under the same
restrictions for changes as public API. IOW: it cannot change (incompatibly)
until Qt 6.
Hi,
most - if not all - d-pointer/private implementation files are
*internal* and should not be used in a normal project - meaning a
project that just uses Qt. These files/classes are clearly marked by
//
// W A R N I N G
// -
//
// This file is not part of the Qt API. It exists
2015-07-20 21:26 GMT+02:00 Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com:
Aside from the variadic and the templateness, what's the difference?
The templateness changes how a type different than the vector's type gets
constructed (it might undergo a conversion first). But assuming I am
pushing
