Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On 07/11/2017 06:36 AM, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: 10.07.2017, 21:56, "Phil Bouchard" : Phil Bouchard wrote: BTW converting Javascript into C++ seems very easy to do In fact, is it me or it would seem that: - converting the Javascript code into

Re: [Development] Nominating Viktor Engelmann for Approver Status

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 11:25:21AM +, Simon Hausmann wrote: > I'd like to propose Viktor for approver status. Since August last year he's > been contributing to QtWebEngine full-time. Based on my experience talking to > him and working with him, I trust him to review changes thoroughly and

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

10.07.2017, 21:56, "Phil Bouchard" : > Phil Bouchard wrote: >>  BTW converting Javascript into C++ seems very easy to do > > In fact, is it me or it would seem that: > - converting the Javascript code into C++ on-the-fly > - compiling the resulting

[Development] Nominating Viktor Engelmann for Approver Status

Hi, I'd like to propose Viktor for approver status. Since August last year he's been contributing to QtWebEngine full-time. Based on my experience talking to him and working with him, I trust him to review changes thoroughly and approve or reject changes responsively. Simon

[Development] Nominating Jesus Fernandez for Approver status

I'd like to nominate Jesus Fernandez for Approver status. Among other things Jesus is the author and the maintainer of qtnetworkauth module, he is actively contributing to qtcore, qtnetwork, qtwebsockets, qsql, etc. He is also participating in the development of the WebGL QPA plugin. This is

Re: [Development] Nominating Jesus Fernandez for Approver status

Timur Pocheptsov (11 July 2017 14:06) > I'd like to nominate Jesus Fernandez for Approver status. +1 Full disclosure: Timur, Jesus and I are all in TQtC's Core & Network team. Eddy. ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On 07/11/2017 04:02 AM, Tim Blechmann wrote: On the other hand, I have good news as I think I have found a way to simulate functions that return a function. how to you cope with structures like: function foo( outObject ) { var object = {} outObject.object = object outObject.result

Re: [Development] Nominating Viktor Engelmann for Approver Status

On 2017-07-11 12:25, Simon Hausmann wrote: Hi, I'd like to propose Viktor for approver status. Since August last year he's been contributing to QtWebEngine full-time. Based on my experience talking to him and working with him, I trust him to review changes thoroughly and approve or reject

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

bar shall be a global variable that is callable (i.e. somebody initialized it with a function closure). When invoked it shall return either a primitive value or a JavaScript object and takes one arbitrary parameter. It is an implementation detail whether it returns the parameter provided, or

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

11.07.2017, 07:52, "Phil Bouchard" : > On 07/10/2017 05:08 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: >>  On segunda-feira, 10 de julho de 2017 11:56:07 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: >>>  Phil Bouchard wrote:  BTW converting Javascript into C++ seems very easy to do

Re: [Development] Nominating Jesus Fernandez for Approver status

+1 Awesome work on OAuth and WebGL! On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 12:06:46 + Timur Pocheptsov wrote: > I'd like to nominate Jesus Fernandez for Approver status. Among other things > Jesus is the author and the maintainer > > of qtnetworkauth module, he is actively

[Development] QtQuick transparent toplevel window broken in dev?

Hi list, while playing around with a recent build of dev (82bdc55bc36f8a785e2637b01cb91d361b01fc29), I've noticed that toplevel window transparency for QQuickWindow seems to have stopped working (at least on macOS, haven't tried Windows so far). Any "ApplicationWindow" with color: "transparent"

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

Simon Hausmann wrote: > > bar shall be a global variable that is callable (i.e. somebody > initialized it with a function closure). When invoked it shall return > either a primitive value or a JavaScript object and takes one arbitrary > parameter. > > > It is an

Re: [Development] QtQuick transparent toplevel window broken in dev?

Please file a bug report, thanks On 11/07/2017 17:20, Nils Jeisecke via Development wrote: Hi list, while playing around with a recent build of dev (82bdc55bc36f8a785e2637b01cb91d361b01fc29), I've noticed that toplevel window transparency for QQuickWindow seems to have stopped working (at

Re: [Development] Nominating Jesus Fernandez for Approver status

On 11.07.2017 14:06, Timur Pocheptsov wrote: I'd like to nominate Jesus Fernandez for Approver status. Among other things Jesus is the author and the maintainer of qtnetworkauth module, he is actively contributing to qtcore, qtnetwork, qtwebsockets, qsql, etc. He is also participating in

Re: [Development] Timeframe for 5.6.3?

Hi, https://wiki.qt.io/Qt_5.6_Release talks about August as a potential time frame. Simon From: Development on behalf of Kevin Kofler Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 11:24:40

Re: [Development] How is Quick Controls 2 deployment meant to be ?

2017-07-08 21:16 GMT+02:00 Massimo Callegari via Development : > > > The fact that something is a 'text' file does not make it different, > > permissions make a difference. > > True, but this discussion moved specifically to Linux, while what I mentioned > in the

[Development] Timeframe for 5.6.3?

Hi, Is there a timeframe for the Qt 5.6.3 LTS release? Or is everyone expected to move to 5.9 now? The last 5.6.x release was in October 2016, and especially QtWebEngine has accumulated a lot of security fixes since then. If it is still going to take a while, could we please at least have

Re: [Development] Qt-AES - Looking for comments

On 2017-07-08 00:39, Matteo wrote: Hi all, I just finished the first preview of my QAESEncryption class and I would like to have some opinions on possible improvements, issues etc. https://github.com/bricke/Qt-AES [1] This is still a work in progress but I feel it's good enough to be shared

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

> On the other hand, I have good news as I think I have found a way to > simulate functions that return a function. how to you cope with structures like: function foo( outObject ) { var object = {} outObject.object = object outObject.result = function() { return object } return

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On 07/11/2017 04:02 AM, Tim Blechmann wrote: On the other hand, I have good news as I think I have found a way to simulate functions that return a function. how to you cope with structures like: function foo( outObject ) { var object = {} outObject.object = object outObject.result

Re: [Development] Qt-AES - Looking for comments

On 11 July 2017 at 22:13, Marc Mutz wrote: > On 2017-07-08 00:39, Matteo wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I just finished the first preview of my QAESEncryption class and I >> would like to have some opinions on possible improvements, issues etc. >> >>

Re: [Development] Qt-AES - Looking for comments

Noted. My point was not to use openssl or external libs, i understand the security issue of something that is not certified and audited. Thank you On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 14:19 Marc Mutz wrote: > On 2017-07-08 00:39, Matteo wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I just finished the