[Development] Possible QDoc bug - no doc generated for a static overloaded method

Hi, as Andre suggested, I am bringing an issue for attention here. My original post: http://developer.qt.nokia.com/forums/viewthread/8914/ QDoc does not generate documentation for QWebServiceMethod::invokeMethod() static overloaded function, while the other (non-static) overload works fine. No

[Development] Adding QML to qmake variables

Hi, working on some QML project now (my, I haven't suspected that Qt Quick is THAT gorgeous... wow, thank you, Trolls, for making it!), an idea struck me, that there is no variable in QMake to add QML files to the project. While I am aware, that both DEPLOYMENTFOLDERS and OTHER_FILES can be used

[Development] Possible bug in signals and slots handling in QML.

Hi, in a recent conversation on QtDN, we have identified a possible bug in QML (Qt Quick 1, that is. It's possible that the both issues affect QtQuick2 too). We have also identified a confusing situation that can be easily clarified in QDoc. First, a link to the discussion, then a short recap on

Re: [Development] Possible bug in signals and slots handling in QML.

@Craig: Good to know, thanks. To be honest, I don't think anybody actually tried double underscores for signal name, in the conversation on QtDN it just cropped up as a sort of what if scenario. But, to take it one step further - does that really matter in QML? MOC, AFAIK, is using signals by

[Development] MouseArea::onWheel event documented but not working (Qt5)

Hi, sorry for double posting but this is relevant for both Qt5 ML (as part of testing) and Qt-qml (since that is where the issue lies). I am trying to use the wheel event available in QtQuick 2.0 Qt5 in QML. Here is a code snippet: MouseArea { id: whatever onWheel: {

Re: [Development] MouseArea::onWheel event documented but not working (Qt5)

On 2 June 2012 18:15, Luís Gabriel Lima luis.gabr...@openbossa.org wrote: Hi Tomasz, The correct event variable name is wheel and not mouse. I'll fix the docs. You can see an example in examples/quick/mousearea/mousearea-wheel-example.qml. Cheers, -- Luís Gabriel OpenBossa - INdT Ah,

Re: [Development] Move QAction from QtWidgets to QtGui

Hi, just a quick note regarding this: Would it not be possible to split QAction in two classes, just like QApplication was split? We could perhaps create a QCoreAction I think a better name would be QSimpleAction. Runs off the tongue a bit more smoothly, plus the Core in the name will

Re: [Development] QML Component inheriting?

What i really miss in QML is the ability to let a component inherit functionality from another component. This is already a feature: just create your components in separate files and use this: // BaseButton.qml Item { property int someNum: 100 ... the basics for a button. } //

Re: [Development] [Interest] Future of Qt Opensource SDK?

A couple of people have requested this: http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/releasing/2012-September/000634.html This is from the Director of Qt RD at Digia, so I think you can count on it. The SDK is dead for non commercial customers. If you disagree, you just might have found your new pet

Re: [Development] Qt 5 for Android developer mailing list

Having a separate list is caring about others like me who are not interested in the Android port development. ;-) A list for Necessitas already exists (for a long time), along with a Google Group. https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/necessitas-devel

Re: [Development] Cleaner code base patches

On 28 January 2013 09:57, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote: Options are: 1) always with -developer-build 2) on by default on -developer-build, but the CI disables it 3) completely optional, CI enables it 4) completely optional, not enabled by the CI I favour options 1 or 2.

Re: [Development] Proposal - QtSerialPort graduation from the Playground

Hi, I just want to drop in with a little thank you and basically to share my thoughts about QtSP. Last week I've built a project using QtSerialPort (with Qt4) to communicate with an Arduino board, and tested it on Linux (Ubuntu and Kubuntu) and Windows (7 and embedded), on numerous PCs (VM,

Re: [Development] Remote use of resources for cross-platform checking of solutions.

On 2 March 2013 18:41, Denis Shienkov scap...@yandex.ru wrote: For remote access, suggest using TeamViewer. Or, if this is not possible, may be someone of the users (from community) can be provide the resources of its OS to solve problems? I don't own a Mac, but I have one at my work place. I

Re: [Development] Question about Qt5 and android official release plans

On 5 March 2013 16:46, Oleg Shalnev oleg.shal...@gmail.com wrote: Does anyone know about of plans for official Qt5 release for android platform. Qt 5.1 will sport a preview version, AFAIK. You can test it already by checking out newest sources from git. Same goes for iOS port.

Re: [Development] 答复: [Qt-interest] QMultiHash

On 7 March 2013 10:58, pengliang(彭亮) pengli...@founder.com wrote: 2. so I need to use Qmaplong,Qstring, I found qt source code below, so I think Qhashlong,Qstring is ordered by long, am I right? That's probably just the hash value. As far as you - user - are concerned, this is

Re: [Development] Proposition for a new Q_OS_ define

On 23 March 2013 01:51, Jake Thomas Petroules jake.petrou...@petroules.com wrote: I'd like to suggest that we add a new Q_OS_ define. Currently, for Apple platforms, we have: Q_OS_DARWIN Q_OS_DARWIN32 Q_OS_DARWIN64 Q_OS_IOS Q_OS_MAC Q_OS_MAC32 Q_OS_MAC64 Q_OS_MACX The first three are

Re: [Development] Taking the new download system into production

On 5 April 2013 16:01, Turunen Tuukka tuukka.turu...@digia.com wrote: [..] We are also looking into leveraging torrents as an additional way of downloading files. I hope we continue to receive more mirrors for Qt Project in the coming weeks. If you are interested in mirroring Qt, see

Re: [Development] Rebuilding Qt5 after adding -prefix fails to link due to missing zlib options

On 11 April 2013 19:46, Jan Kundrát j...@flaska.net wrote: I've managed to accidentally reproduce this error on two machines (Gentoo Linux, gcc 4.6.x,... and a RHEL6 clone). Can I somehow requse what I've built so far, or do I have to clear everything and wait again? :) Wrong ML. This is

Re: [Development] New Qt 5.2 snapshot build #172

On 27 November 2013 10:09, Koehne Kai kai.koe...@digia.com wrote: Subject: Re: [Development] New Qt 5.2 snapshot build #172 Hi all. I find this one: https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-35002 I cannot remember any other related to 5.2 RC1 installer fonts. Do you see this is

Re: [Development] Qt5, Widget move events, and the bug that won't die

On 13 January 2014 21:12, Alex Montgomery apmontgom...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I understand that Widgets are considered complete in Qt5, and no new features are going to be added, but it's seeming more and more like the actual position of developers is that Widgets are fully deprecated. I

Re: [Development] [Qt-creator] Gerrit disapproval messages

On 26 January 2014 09:06, Orgad Shaneh org...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Following this discussion from about a year ago, gerrit has recently accepted a wording change for default -1 and -2 Code-Review labels. The scores are now: -1 - I would prefer this is not merged as is -2 - This shall not

Re: [Development] [Qt-creator] Gerrit disapproval messages

On 26 January 2014 20:41, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote: On domingo, 26 de janeiro de 2014 18:31:18, Tomasz Siekierda wrote: The scores are now: -1 - I would prefer this is not merged as is -2 - This shall not be merged I suggest configuring qt-project gerrit

Re: [Development] GCompris goes the Qt Quick route

On 9 February 2014 14:56, Bruno Coudoin bruno.coud...@gcompris.net wrote: Hi, For those who don't know me, I am the author of the educational software GCompris (http://gcompris.net). The project started in 2000 and is based on Gtk+. As you imagine, many users are requesting us a tablet

[Development] Fwd: Qt open source license in product

On 5 March 2014 10:13, Ramakanthreddy Kesireddy ramakanthreddy.kesire...@techmahindra.com wrote: I have read something like below: Applications using Qt that use the open-source licenses need to follow the same license, so their source would need to be made available. We are using Qt Open

Re: [Development] Harmonizing the Qt 5.x Documentation

On 11 March 2014 10:01, Pasion Jerome jerome.pas...@digia.com wrote: Hello all, Short summary: We will be redirecting viewers of Qt 5.0 and Qt 5.1 documentation to Qt 5 documentation. Subsequently, we will remove the 5.0 and 5.1 documentation from qt-project.org and we will place future Qt

Re: [Development] [Announce] Qt Creator 3.1 RC1 released

On 3 April 2014 10:47, List for announcements regarding Qt releases and development annou...@qt-project.org wrote: We are happy to announce the Qt Creator 3.1 RC1 release Blog: http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2014/04/03/qt-creator-3-1-rc1-released/ Download:

[Development] Qt use under LGPL and exceptions to it

Hi, one of our forum users has spotted a curious discrepancy in Qt licensing texts. It turns out, that the online docs have this paragraph at the bottom of LGPL license text: Digia Qt LGPL Exception version 1.1 As a special exception to the GNU Lesser General Public License version 2.1, the

Re: [Development] Qt use under LGPL and exceptions to it

On 22 June 2014 15:43, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote: Em dom 22 jun 2014, às 11:08:40, Tomasz Siekierda escreveu: Those 2 exceptions seem to contradict themselves, in my opinion (the first one restricts our rights, while the other one expands them). Can anybody throw some

Re: [Development] Contribution proposal: Dispatcher class

On 24 September 2014 11:34, Sune Vuorela nos...@vuorela.dk wrote: On 2014-09-24, Yam Marcovic ymar...@gmail.com wrote: However, I will say I don't want to force people to give their sources away if they use it. So a license along the lines of 'this license is here for formal purposes; but

Re: [Development] The life of a file name and other possibly mal-encoded strings on non-Windows systems

This was discussed to exhaustion in Qt 5's development process. The conclusion is to remain at status quo since there is no good, technical solution. I’d think that the solution could be to use a dedicated class for file names, perhaps with a base class for uninterpreted platform strings.

Re: [Development] Is QMap Broken

On 06. 11. 14 09:13, André Somers wrote: Tomasz Siekierda schreef op 6-11-2014 09:10: To store 2 items at a single position in list/ vector, you can use QPair, like this: QLIstQPairtype1, type2 () Better yet, just use a struct then. QPair in my experience results in badly readable code. Who

Re: [Development] RFC: Improved Q_ENUM

On 15 December 2014 at 14:38, Olivier Goffart oliv...@woboq.com wrote: Any opinions or comments? Quick and simple comment from me: this feature sounds great! A big, shiny +1 from me. It will come in handy in many projects I am involved with. ___

Re: [Development] qtchooser (was: Re: Adding new third party component three.js to Qt?)

On 20 January 2015 at 05:23, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote: On Tuesday 20 January 2015 00:47:50 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: I think there is a point which we might be missing in this long thread. For Qt5 we are not asking for a simple rename because that *would*

Re: [Development] Proposal: Deprecating platforms in Qt 5.6 that don't support lambda

On 19 February 2015 at 14:17, Rafael Roquetto rafael.roque...@kdab.com wrote: One of the many reasons for that is that many of those systems running QNX are homologated and changing/upgrading involves lots of different process apart from the technical stuff. So those companies/ users of QNX

Re: [Development] Proposal: Deprecating platforms in Qt 5.6 that don't support lambda

On 20 February 2015 at 12:52, Alejandro Exojo s...@badopi.org wrote: El Thursday 19 February 2015, Tomasz Siekierda escribió: So those companies/ users of QNX are not willing to upgrade their OS, compiler, but they are willing to upgrade Qt? I think the main problem with requiring a very up

Re: [Development] Qt Quick Controls for Embedded

On 8 April 2015 at 17:35, Oswald Buddenhagen oswald.buddenha...@theqtcompany.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 04:39:52PM +0200, Frederik Gladhorn wrote: On Wednesday, April 08, 2015 04:30:23 PM Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: so ideally we find the perfect new name for both module and repository.

Re: [Development] QNoDebug - available but undocumented

On 31 July 2015 at 10:26, Smith Martin martin.sm...@theqtcompany.com wrote: qdebug.cpp should contain a comment like this: /*! \class QNoDebug \internal */ Well, it does not contain this comment. Olivier Goffart: It's a fake class that replaces QDebug when QT_NO_DEBUG_OUTPUT is

[Development] QNoDebug - available but undocumented

Hi, just a quick observation: QNoDebug class can be used in code (compiles, works fine), but there is no documentation for it. Is that intentional? Shouldn't it be either hidden (made private) or documented? Although I have just learned about it's existence by accident, it looks like it can be

Re: [Development] Container benchmark was HEADS UP: Don't use QList, use Q_DECLARE_TYPEINFO

On 17 July 2015 at 11:02, André Somers an...@familiesomers.nl wrote: But I separated key and values into different containers, so even at optimum, you get two cache hits instead of one with QHash. As Ossi pointed out in the review, that's probably a pessimisation unless you have a very loaded

Re: [Development] 5.5.1 ChangeLog contains important information, please make sure it's in the announcement

On 23 September 2015 at 21:47, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com> wrote: > On Wednesday 23 September 2015 08:42:55 Tomasz Siekierda wrote: >> * Fixed a minor source-incompatibility between Qt 5.4 and 5.5.0 >> involving sets of functions overloaded on QTime and som

Re: [Development] 5.5.1 ChangeLog contains important information, please make sure it's in the announcement

On 23 September 2015 at 08:08, Knoll Lars wrote: > > On 23/09/15 06:12, "Thiago Macieira" wrote: >>Also, please don't link to individual modules' changelogs. People won't >>read >>that. I prepared a master changelog, which you can find at

Re: [Development] Recommendations for 3rd-party QCH file installation folder for easy discovery?

On 30 November 2016 at 17:14, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > > And seeing that KDE uses /usr/share/doc/HTML for documentation in html/ > docbook(?) format I am for now proposing > /usr/share/doc/QCH Sounds good. And just to add my voice - I think automatic pickup of

Re: [Development] [BB++] Now is 3.5x faster than Node.JS

On 25 July 2017 at 03:09, Phil Bouchard wrote: > That's why you have to put chances on your side. Regarding the GC all you > have to do is look at the logs: > http://www.war-worlds.com/blog/2012/06/on-android-garbage-collection-can-kill-you What killed the performance in

Re: [Development] [Qt-creator] Requesting repository for telemetry plugin in Qt Creator

Another point: if you do collect usage data, please bear in mind that sometimes a feature can be used very rarely, but still be vital. In other words, do not consider a feature as "unnecessary" or "can be deprecated" if it is not used often. For example, I mostly do mobile and desktop apps, but I

Re: [Development] QUIP 12: Code of Conduct

> > вс, 28 окт. 2018 г. в 10:47, Tomasz Siekierda : > > Hi Alexey, I've just read the QUIP proposal and couldn't find any > > controversial sentences. Could you elaborate? Which points shall be > > discussed? > > > > > The controversial discriminati

Re: [Development] QUIP 12: Code of Conduct

> The controversial discrimination protection sentences at least should be > carefully discussed. It's not some thing that we could accept as easy as > rewrite. Hi Alexey, I've just read the QUIP proposal and couldn't find any controversial sentences. Could you elaborate? Which points shall be

Re: [Development] wip/cmake status information

On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 at 13:31, Tobias Hunger wrote: > > Hi! > [...] > # Building > > The basic way of building with cmake is as follows: > > ``` > cd {build directory} > cmake {path to source directory} > cmake --build . > ``` Just a quick question wrt to that snippet: what is the

Re: [Development] Opinions on QTBUG-71545

On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 20:32, Konstantin Shegunov wrote: > > Hello, > Since we couldn't agree, I'd love to see some more opinions about this one.[1] > > Specifically: > 1) Is parenting to the application object a thing? Never done it myself. But Q*Application is clearly marked as derived from

[Development] Gerrit "no matching cipher found"

Hi, it's been a while since I've last pushed to gerrit. I'm getting this: $ git push gerrit HEAD:refs/for/dev Unable to negotiate with 54.229.21.112 port 29418: no matching cipher found. Their offer: aes128-cbc,aes192-cbc,aes256-cbc,blowfish-cbc fatal: Could not read from remote repository.

Re: [Development] Gerrit "no matching cipher found"

Perfect, that worked! Thanks, Konstantin! And thanks Thiago for explanation, too. On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 at 21:43, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On Wednesday, 10 October 2018 10:43:32 PDT Tomasz Siekierda wrote: > > I'm on Kubuntu 18.10. I've made sure the ssh pub key on gerrit is

Re: [Development] char8_t summary?

On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 at 18:43, Matthew Woehlke wrote: > On 11/07/2019 05.05, Mutz, Marc via Development wrote: > > There is a cost associated with another string class, too, and it's > > combinatorial explosion. Even when we have all view types > > (QLatin1StringView, QUtf8StringView,

Re: [Development] Stepping down as QtSerialPort maintainer

On Wed, 7 Oct 2020 at 09:40, Denis Shienkov wrote: > [...] > > Thanks so much for using QtSerialPort, I'm glad it was useful > to someone. > Thanks for all your work, that module is awesome, I've used it many times. > > BR, > Denis > > > ___ >

Re: [Development] Leaving The Qt Company

Many thanks for all your fantastic work on and around Qt! And good luck with your new startup :-) On Wed, 18 May 2022 at 10:30, Lars Knoll wrote: > Hi all, > > Let’s take the big news first. I’ve resigned from my position at The Qt > Company. More on that and what it means for the Qt Project

Re: [Development] Decrease amount of qt releases in online installer

On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 at 11:44, Jani Heikkinen via Development < development@qt-project.org> wrote: > Hi, > > > > Currently, more than 60 Qt releases can be installed from the Qt open > source online installer (if all installation categories are selected). This > requires a huge amount of disk