Re: [Development] Qt 5.10 schedule etc
Hi, On 08/08/2017 17:56, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: On Dienstag, 8. August 2017 10:41:02 CEST Jani Heikkinen wrote: Hi all, We should have FF & branching today. Unfortunately we are still fighting with some issues in qt5.git integration in 'dev' . That's why we haven't been able to start soft branching yet :( But that doesn't mean we will officially delay the FF ;) So let's freeze new features for Qt 5.10 today as planned. Please don't put any new features in for 5.10 anymore. We will start soft branching immediately when issues with qt5.git integration in' dev' are solved. And we will finalize branching ~ after a week from that date when soft branching starts. So there will be still enough time to get changes in which are currently suffering these issues in dev. I would suggest allowing features that couldnt get in due to git issues, still be allowed to integrate once it is fixed. I don't know of anything specific that has been caught by that though. +1 and on a related note, I keep hitting: Project ERROR: Cannot run compiler '/home/qt/work/b2qt/toolchain/sysroots/x86_64-pokysdk-linux/usr/bin/arm-poky-linux-gnueabi/arm-poky-linux-gnueabi-g++'. Maybe you forgot to setup the environment? when attempting to integrate changes to Qt 3D (for the skeletal animation feature). Could somebody with CI-fu take a look please? Thanks! Sean -- Dr Sean Harmer | sean.har...@kdab.com | Managing Director UK KDAB (UK) Ltd, a KDAB Group company Tel. +44 (0)1625 809908; Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090 Mobile: +44 (0)7545 140604 KDAB - Qt Experts ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Qt 5.10 schedule etc
On Dienstag, 8. August 2017 10:41:02 CEST Jani Heikkinen wrote: > Hi all, > > We should have FF & branching today. Unfortunately we are still fighting > with some issues in qt5.git integration in 'dev' . That's why we haven't > been able to start soft branching yet :( But that doesn't mean we will > officially delay the FF ;) > > So let's freeze new features for Qt 5.10 today as planned. Please don't put > any new features in for 5.10 anymore. We will start soft branching > immediately when issues with qt5.git integration in' dev' are solved. And > we will finalize branching ~ after a week from that date when soft > branching starts. So there will be still enough time to get changes in > which are currently suffering these issues in dev. > I would suggest allowing features that couldnt get in due to git issues, still be allowed to integrate once it is fixed. I don't know of anything specific that has been caught by that though. 'Allan ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Qt 5.10 schedule etc
Hi all, We should have FF & branching today. Unfortunately we are still fighting with some issues in qt5.git integration in 'dev' . That's why we haven't been able to start soft branching yet :( But that doesn't mean we will officially delay the FF ;) So let's freeze new features for Qt 5.10 today as planned. Please don't put any new features in for 5.10 anymore. We will start soft branching immediately when issues with qt5.git integration in' dev' are solved. And we will finalize branching ~ after a week from that date when soft branching starts. So there will be still enough time to get changes in which are currently suffering these issues in dev. br, Jani From: Development on behalf of Jani Heikkinen Sent: Tuesday, August 1, 2017 9:55 AM To: development@qt-project.org Cc: releas...@qt-project.org Subject: [Development] Qt 5.10 schedule etc Hi all, Kindly reminder: According to schedule we should have Qt 5.10 feature freeze after a week, see https://wiki.qt.io/Qt_5.10_Release. So it is time to do remaining finalizations to 5.10 new features now and focus to bug fixing after that. Please fill new features page now as well (https://wiki.qt.io/New_Features_in_Qt_5.10); it seems to be quite empty at the moment. And we should start soft branching today. But as Frederik informed yesterday we are planning to do some changes to coin infrastructure during this week (see http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2017-July/030596.html). So let's postpone the start of soft branching a bit and do it after coin infra changes are in & working. Doing one more branch just now makes these coin changes more difficult & most probably causes more delays in the future. So the plan with 5.10 is following: 1. Let's keep the agreed ff as it is (8.8.2017) 2. Get first 5.10 binary snapshot from 'dev' out as soon as possible 3. Start soft branching (from 'dev' to '5.10') immediately after coin infra changes are in & every branch ('5.6', 5.9' & 'dev') is working ok with infra changes 4. Finalize branching (~ a week from soft branching) 5. Release Qt 5.10 alpha as soon as possible after the branching. We should be able to do this quite quickly; As usual Alpha will be src packages only and we can already create needed ones from 'dev'. * Most probably we should be able to deliver binary snapshot with alpha as well. If not just at same time then quite soon after the release... br, Jani ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Qt 5.10 schedule etc
On Tuesday, 1 August 2017 00:18:18 PDT Thiago Macieira wrote: > https://codereview.qt-project.org/200068 > https://codereview.qt-project.org/200072 Thanks everyone for the efforts in getting the changes in. Almost everything merged. The two commits above are the only remaining new features. The remaining issues below are bugfixes and can be accepted in the stable branch. Or they're not important. I have another 15 patches to submit that require either rebasing the changes below or their acceptance. No new features, just refactoring. > https://codereview.qt-project.org/200074 > https://codereview.qt-project.org/199000 > https://codereview.qt-project.org/200066 > https://codereview.qt-project.org/200180 > https://codereview.qt-project.org/200924 > https://codereview.qt-project.org/200832 > https://codereview.qt-project.org/200258 -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Qt 5.10 schedule etc
> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development-bounces+mitch.curtis=qt.io@qt- > project.org] On Behalf Of Thiago Macieira > Sent: Tuesday, 1 August 2017 9:40 AM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] Qt 5.10 schedule etc > > On terça-feira, 1 de agosto de 2017 00:18:18 PDT Thiago Macieira wrote: > > 1. Integrate all of Ossi's configure changes to 5.9 (re-staged now) > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/201118 > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/201119 > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/201120 > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/201121 > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/201201 > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/201122 > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/201120 > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/201202 > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/201203 > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/201204 > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/201205 > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/199408 > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/201206 > > Failed integration with: > > Module "" () Failed to provision template 'qtci-windows-8-x86_64- > 2- > da597b': > Could not clone template: qtci-windows-8-x86_64-2-da597b - Template VM > was not found. > > This same error has been happening for a fix in qtwebkit. I've seen the same error and was told that there are network problems that are being looked into. > > 2. Merge those up to dev. > > > > 3. Apply all my changes > > set 1: > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/167049 > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/200061 > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/165952 > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/199037 > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/200062 > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/200073 > > Set 1 is now staged. > > Going to bed now. > > -- > Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com > Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center > > ___ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Qt 5.10 schedule etc
On terça-feira, 1 de agosto de 2017 00:18:18 PDT Thiago Macieira wrote: > 1. Integrate all of Ossi's configure changes to 5.9 (re-staged now) > https://codereview.qt-project.org/201118 > https://codereview.qt-project.org/201119 > https://codereview.qt-project.org/201120 > https://codereview.qt-project.org/201121 > https://codereview.qt-project.org/201201 > https://codereview.qt-project.org/201122 > https://codereview.qt-project.org/201120 > https://codereview.qt-project.org/201202 > https://codereview.qt-project.org/201203 > https://codereview.qt-project.org/201204 > https://codereview.qt-project.org/201205 > https://codereview.qt-project.org/199408 > https://codereview.qt-project.org/201206 Failed integration with: Module "" () Failed to provision template 'qtci-windows-8-x86_64-2- da597b': Could not clone template: qtci-windows-8-x86_64-2-da597b - Template VM was not found. This same error has been happening for a fix in qtwebkit. > 2. Merge those up to dev. > > 3. Apply all my changes > set 1: > https://codereview.qt-project.org/167049 > https://codereview.qt-project.org/200061 > https://codereview.qt-project.org/165952 > https://codereview.qt-project.org/199037 > https://codereview.qt-project.org/200062 > https://codereview.qt-project.org/200073 Set 1 is now staged. Going to bed now. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Re: [Development] Qt 5.10 schedule etc
On segunda-feira, 31 de julho de 2017 23:55:28 PDT Jani Heikkinen wrote: > And we should start soft branching today. But as Frederik informed yesterday > we are planning to do some changes to coin infrastructure during this week > (see > http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2017-July/030596.html). > So let's postpone the start of soft branching a bit and do it after coin > infra changes are in & working. Doing one more branch just now makes these > coin changes more difficult & most probably causes more delays in the > future. > > So the plan with 5.10 is following: > 1. Let's keep the agreed ff as it is (8.8.2017) Please note that this means that in the next 7 days we need to: 1. Integrate all of Ossi's configure changes to 5.9 (re-staged now) https://codereview.qt-project.org/201118 https://codereview.qt-project.org/201119 https://codereview.qt-project.org/201120 https://codereview.qt-project.org/201121 https://codereview.qt-project.org/201201 https://codereview.qt-project.org/201122 https://codereview.qt-project.org/201120 https://codereview.qt-project.org/201202 https://codereview.qt-project.org/201203 https://codereview.qt-project.org/201204 https://codereview.qt-project.org/201205 https://codereview.qt-project.org/199408 https://codereview.qt-project.org/201206 2. Merge those up to dev. 3. Apply all my changes set 1: https://codereview.qt-project.org/167049 https://codereview.qt-project.org/200061 https://codereview.qt-project.org/165952 https://codereview.qt-project.org/199037 https://codereview.qt-project.org/200062 https://codereview.qt-project.org/200073 set 2: https://codereview.qt-project.org/199004 https://codereview.qt-project.org/199005 https://codereview.qt-project.org/200063 https://codereview.qt-project.org/200064 https://codereview.qt-project.org/200065 https://codereview.qt-project.org/200453 https://codereview.qt-project.org/199007 https://codereview.qt-project.org/200068 https://codereview.qt-project.org/200069 https://codereview.qt-project.org/200070 https://codereview.qt-project.org/200071 https://codereview.qt-project.org/200072 https://codereview.qt-project.org/200074 https://codereview.qt-project.org/199000 https://codereview.qt-project.org/200066 https://codereview.qt-project.org/200180 https://codereview.qt-project.org/200924 https://codereview.qt-project.org/200832 https://codereview.qt-project.org/200258 https://codereview.qt-project.org/200836 https://codereview.qt-project.org/200926 -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
[Development] Qt 5.10 schedule etc
Hi all, Kindly reminder: According to schedule we should have Qt 5.10 feature freeze after a week, see https://wiki.qt.io/Qt_5.10_Release. So it is time to do remaining finalizations to 5.10 new features now and focus to bug fixing after that. Please fill new features page now as well (https://wiki.qt.io/New_Features_in_Qt_5.10); it seems to be quite empty at the moment. And we should start soft branching today. But as Frederik informed yesterday we are planning to do some changes to coin infrastructure during this week (see http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2017-July/030596.html). So let's postpone the start of soft branching a bit and do it after coin infra changes are in & working. Doing one more branch just now makes these coin changes more difficult & most probably causes more delays in the future. So the plan with 5.10 is following: 1. Let's keep the agreed ff as it is (8.8.2017) 2. Get first 5.10 binary snapshot from 'dev' out as soon as possible 3. Start soft branching (from 'dev' to '5.10') immediately after coin infra changes are in & every branch ('5.6', 5.9' & 'dev') is working ok with infra changes 4. Finalize branching (~ a week from soft branching) 5. Release Qt 5.10 alpha as soon as possible after the branching. We should be able to do this quite quickly; As usual Alpha will be src packages only and we can already create needed ones from 'dev'. * Most probably we should be able to deliver binary snapshot with alpha as well. If not just at same time then quite soon after the release... br, Jani ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development