On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 14:44 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> Indeed, and other vendors hook into it, so it's probably bad form to
> ignore it. I've committed functionality in
> cad70317771fa6ce1f52af9d357165d47e971d7d to exercise this -- can you
> please check and let me know it's okay. Thanks.
Than
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 08:08 -0400, Michael Terry wrote:
> But one additional thing that pm-powersave does is allow applications to
> hook into am-I-on-battery? events and run a script (by dropping them
> in /usr/lib/pm-utils/power.d). Is there a replacement for such a
> mechanism?
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 08:08 -0400, Michael Terry wrote:
> In all of Ubuntu, only three apps use the mechanism:
> anacron (to not consume CPU when in battery mode)
> distributed-net (to not consume CPU when in battery mode)
> hdparm (to set disk APM modes)
Oh, whoops, and laptop-mode
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 09:52 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > Is it just a feature that is yet to be written, or is the expectation
> > that pm-powersave is not part of the dk-p stack?
>
> I think a lot of that functionality needs to be moved down into the
> kernel, and connected up with pmqos so
Hello, gentle DeviceKit developers!
I'm looking at cleaning up some acpi scripts in Ubuntu Karmic, and I ran
into an interesting issue.
With HAL, there was a SetPowerSave dbus command to (basically) run
pm-powersave. There doesn't *seem* to be a similar command for
DeviceKit-power.
pm-powersa
