[freenet-dev] [GSoC 2011] Idea : Porting to Apache Struts

2011-04-05 Thread freenet.10.technomat...@recursor.net
Struts is a large, complex and largely superseded framework (by JBoss, Spring etc) - the .jar is several megs in size, requiring considerable configuration. Given the amount of HTML in Freenet, then one would think a lightweight templating engine might be more in order: Apache Velocity for

[freenet-dev] [GSoC 2011] Idea : Porting to Apache Struts

2011-04-05 Thread Pouyan Zachar
[Original message from Pouyan] >> >> I wanted to suggest porting already existing "Toadlets" to normal >> >> servlets and utilize Apache Struts framework for more simplicity [Matthew Said] >> > My recollection is servlets are far more complex and we don't use most of >> > their features? On the

[freenet-dev] [GSoC 2011] Idea : Porting to Apache Struts

2011-04-05 Thread Matthew Toseland
don't have javascript? -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20110405/612ed643/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1364

2011-04-05 Thread Matthew Toseland
was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20110405/6e95ed29/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] [GSoC 2011] Idea : Porting to Apache Struts

2011-04-05 Thread Pouyan Zachar
[Original message from Pouyan] >> I wanted to suggest porting already existing "Toadlets" to normal >> servlets and utilize Apache Struts framework for more simplicity. This >> would make it easier and more intuitive to design and develop the web >> interface (fproxy) using JSP pages. However it

[freenet-dev] [GSoC 2011] Idea : Porting to Apache Struts

2011-04-05 Thread Matthew Toseland
non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20110405/62dd7876/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] GSoC - 2011

2011-04-05 Thread Matthew Toseland
ication/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20110405/410a9e65/attachment.pgp>

Re: [freenet-dev] GSoC - 2011

2011-04-05 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Sunday 03 Apr 2011 10:45:49 sandhyaa r wrote: I am a third year (6th semester) Computer Science and Engineering (Bachelor of Engineering) student of PES Institute of Technology, Bangalore, India. I am interested in the projects Improve the web interface and A microblogging and/or real-time

Re: [freenet-dev] [GSoC 2011] Idea : Porting to Apache Struts

2011-04-05 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Thursday 31 Mar 2011 09:56:22 Pouyan Zachar wrote: Hi everyone: I wanted to suggest porting already existing Toadlets to normal servlets and utilize Apache Struts framework for more simplicity. This would make it easier and more intuitive to design and develop the web interface (fproxy)

Re: [freenet-dev] [GSoC 2011] Idea : Porting to Apache Struts

2011-04-05 Thread Pouyan Zachar
[Original message from Pouyan] I wanted to suggest porting already existing Toadlets to normal servlets and utilize Apache Struts framework for more simplicity. This would make it easier and more intuitive to design and develop the web interface (fproxy) using JSP pages. However it may not be

[freenet-dev] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1364

2011-04-05 Thread Matthew Toseland
Freenet 0.7.5 build 1364 is now available. This is a big build, with lots of changes including some very low-level changes that might affect connections. It will be mandatory on April 11th. Please upgrade, and let me know how it goes! Changes include: - A new packet send scheduler, based on

Re: [freenet-dev] [GSoC 2011] Idea : Porting to Apache Struts

2011-04-05 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tuesday 05 Apr 2011 13:19:10 Pouyan Zachar wrote: [Original message from Pouyan] I wanted to suggest porting already existing Toadlets to normal servlets and utilize Apache Struts framework for more simplicity. This would make it easier and more intuitive to design and develop the web

Re: [freenet-dev] [GSoC 2011] Idea : Porting to Apache Struts

2011-04-05 Thread Pouyan Zachar
[Original message from Pouyan] I wanted to suggest porting already existing Toadlets to normal servlets and utilize Apache Struts framework for more simplicity [Matthew Said] My recollection is servlets are far more complex and we don't use most of their features? On the other hand,

Re: [freenet-dev] [GSoC 2011] Idea : Porting to Apache Struts

2011-04-05 Thread freenet . 10 . technomation
Struts is a large, complex and largely superseded framework (by JBoss, Spring etc) - the .jar is several megs in size, requiring considerable configuration. Given the amount of HTML in Freenet, then one would think a lightweight templating engine might be more in order: Apache Velocity for