ewing the data.
Best wishes,
Arne
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 316 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20110902/bd7a8c0f/attachment.pgp>
bunch of metrics we have no idea how to interpret won't get us
anywhere.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
Founder, The Freenet Project
Email: ian at freenetproject.org
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org
wrote:
WE NEED MORE DATA.
Well, my gut tells me that our existing scheme is likely too complicated to
fix unless we are extremely fortuitous, however I'm happy to be wrong about
that if others think that they have a
Am Freitag, 2. September 2011, 12:20:02 schrieb Ian Clarke:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org
wrote:
WE NEED MORE DATA.
Well, my gut tells me that our existing scheme is likely too complicated to
fix unless we are extremely fortuitous, however
On Friday 02 Sep 2011 18:20:02 Ian Clarke wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org
wrote:
WE NEED MORE DATA.
Well, my gut tells me that our existing scheme is likely too complicated to
fix unless we are extremely fortuitous, however I'm happy to
On Friday 02 Sep 2011 19:31:14 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
Am Freitag, 2. September 2011, 12:20:02 schrieb Ian Clarke:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org
wrote:
WE NEED MORE DATA.
Well, my gut tells me that our existing scheme is likely
On Friday 02 Sep 2011 18:20:02 Ian Clarke wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org
wrote:
WE NEED MORE DATA.
Well, my gut tells me that our existing scheme is likely too complicated to
fix unless we are extremely fortuitous, however I'm happy
Am Freitag, 2. September 2011, 23:34:29 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
If the load balancer does not have some hidden delicacies, there is a
very simple check to see if my understanding is right.
Since SSKs are mostly unsuccessfull and are about 50% of the requests,
the bandwidth limiter
