t it was more of a theoretical simulation. We'll see how
> close theory matches reality I guess ;)
Obviously, opennet will have uptime issues (but hopefully they will settle
after a reasonable period), and darknet presumably won't...
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20120620/b8f416d5/attachment.pgp>
barriers between different parts of the network, are there large
areas with similar locations but few connections, etc?
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20120620/d0a5b618/attachment.pgp>
hiem1
>
> [1] https://github.com/thynix/fred-staging/tree/newProbesDev
> [2] https://wiki.freenetproject.org/User:Operhiem1/MHProbeFCP
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20120620/7a15e3e4/attachment.pgp>
;
> Regards,
> Chetan Hosmani
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20120620/382f8a20/attachment.pgp>
; Devl at freenetproject.org
> https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL:
<
ype: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20120620/370d8e32/attachment.pgp>
Hi Pouyan,
Thanks for getting us up to date!
I just updated the plugin, and it looks partially functional, now.
- A nice idea would be to get the patch for jar loader included in freenet as
soon as possible!
Currently the list of bookmarks looks very hectic and the cathegories are
missing.
s 2 the count or fraction of nodes which are at
the maximum 10. That information can be used for all kinds of other
research as well.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20120620/a03046db/attachment.html>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/19/2012 04:10 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> However, DoS protection should be a little stronger than has been
> discussed: You should limit the average number of probes on a
> given link per unit time, like we do with swapping. This should
>
Hi Pouyan,
Thanks for getting us up to date!
I just updated the plugin, and it looks partially functional, now.
- A nice idea would be to get the patch for jar loader included in freenet as
soon as possible!
Currently the list of bookmarks looks very hectic and the cathegories are
missing.
On 06/19/2012 04:10 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
However, DoS protection should be a little stronger than has been
discussed: You should limit the average number of probes on a
given link per unit time, like we do with swapping. This should
probably be an average, and should be generous
On Wednesday 23 May 2012 18:00:40 Chetan Hosmani wrote:
Hello everyone,
I have been a bit busy last week, and haven't committed much code.
Here are the following refactor changes I have implemented and pushed
to refactor-1 branch-
1. Added a separate list for transport managers. So we
On Saturday 12 May 2012 05:23:25 Steve Dougherty wrote:
I'm still working on the initial implementation of MH-corrected probes
in Fred. I'm pretty close to having minimal functionality working, and
next week I plan to finish up the initial implementation. However, I'm
not happy with the
On Thursday 10 May 2012 01:08:45 Evan Daniel wrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Zlatin Balevsky zlat...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/28/2012 06:56 PM, Zlatin Balevsky wrote:
In Gnutella we observed that long-lived nodes tend to be better
connected and that they also cluster with other
On Tuesday 01 May 2012 00:27:26 Michael Grube wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Steve Dougherty st...@asksteved.comwrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/28/2012 06:56 PM, Zlatin Balevsky wrote:
In Gnutella we observed that long-lived nodes tend to be better
15 matches
Mail list logo
