[freenet-dev] The previous library-cannot-compile-in-eclipse problem

e fixed by simply renaming the classes (or functiones, but not both). Regards, Daniel Cheng (SDiZ) ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://osprey.vm.bytemark.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

[freenet-dev] The previous library-cannot-compile-in-eclipse problem

e fixed by simply renaming the classes (or functiones, but not both). Regards, Daniel Cheng (SDiZ)

[freenet-dev] Time to say good-bye (to the Freenet community)

found that too important, I may ask my friends help me to restore them. "To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven" (Eccl 3:1). I know this is very sudden -- it surprise me as well. But this is the right time to move on. Goodbye friends, I will miss y

[freenet-dev] Time to say good-bye (to the Freenet community)

found that too important, I may ask my friends help me to restore them. "To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven" (Eccl 3:1). I know this is very sudden -- it surprise me as well. But this is the right time to move on. Goodbye friends, I will miss y

[freenet-dev] New filename sanitiser: 506944c538a2463e60a83b36e29d13487dd09150

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 8:04 PM, xor wrote: > On Thursday 18 February 2010 19:46:05 Matthew Toseland wrote: >> > > we can at least try to avoid making the problem any worse. >> > >> > I agree that we need re-inserts to work. It was one of my goals with the >> > new sanitizer: The old one removed v

Re: [freenet-dev] New filename sanitiser: 506944c538a2463e60a83b36e29d13487dd09150

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 8:04 PM, xor wrote: > On Thursday 18 February 2010 19:46:05 Matthew Toseland wrote: >> > > we can at least try to avoid making the problem any worse. >> > >> > I agree that we need re-inserts to work. It was one of my goals with the >> > new sanitizer: The old one removed v

[freenet-dev] New filename sanitiser: 506944c538a2463e60a83b36e29d13487dd09150

On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 6:21 AM, xor wrote: > On Wednesday 17 February 2010 18:21:59 Matthew Toseland wrote: >> + private static final boolean operatingSystemIsWindows() { // TODO: Move >> to the proper class + try { >> + return System.getProperty("os.name").toLowerCase().indexOf("win") >= 0; >> +

[freenet-dev] Memory usage and freenet [commit: 3c02c397bfea7418d5d311ba481c3b3c7df96e2e by xor]

Hi all, Do we still concern memory usage? I am seeing the memory usage of freenet climb higher and higher in recently release. It is no longer possible to run a node in an 128m memory box. With 3c02c397bfea7418d5d311ba481c3b3c7df96e2e, may I say the promise/envision of low-memory/embeded usage de

Re: [freenet-dev] New filename sanitiser: 506944c538a2463e60a83b36e29d13487dd09150

On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 6:21 AM, xor wrote: > On Wednesday 17 February 2010 18:21:59 Matthew Toseland wrote: >> + private static final boolean operatingSystemIsWindows() { // TODO: Move >> to the proper class + try { >> + return System.getProperty("os.name").toLowerCase().indexOf("win") >= 0; >> +

[freenet-dev] Memory usage and freenet [commit: 3c02c397bfea7418d5d311ba481c3b3c7df96e2e by xor]

Hi all, Do we still concern memory usage? I am seeing the memory usage of freenet climb higher and higher in recently release. It is no longer possible to run a node in an 128m memory box. With 3c02c397bfea7418d5d311ba481c3b3c7df96e2e, may I say the promise/envision of low-memory/embeded usage de

[freenet-dev] Chinese search in Library

On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 11:15 PM, Daniel Cheng wrote: > On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:41 PM, Matthew Toseland > wrote: >> Is there any chance you could implement or at least test Chinese searching? >> As far as I can see all we need to do is: >> - Decode surrogates >>

Re: [freenet-dev] Chinese search in Library

On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 11:15 PM, Daniel Cheng wrote: > On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:41 PM, Matthew Toseland > wrote: >> Is there any chance you could implement or at least test Chinese searching? >> As far as I can see all we need to do is: >> - Decode surrogates >>

[freenet-dev] Cannot edit sourceforge wiki

On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 5:48 AM, Ximin Luo wrote: > Shoey Fighter wrote: >> Is there a way to let public and/or sourceforge members access by >> default? (I see that there is a group "editor" to allow people ?to >> edit, but that seems to be a PITA) > > toad is going to look into that; it involves

Re: [freenet-dev] Cannot edit sourceforge wiki

On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 5:48 AM, Ximin Luo wrote: > Shoey Fighter wrote: >> Is there a way to let public and/or sourceforge members access by >> default? (I see that there is a group "editor" to allow people  to >> edit, but that seems to be a PITA) > > toad is going to look into that; it involves

[freenet-dev] unmerged branches

On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Ximin Luo wrote: > Ximin Luo wrote: >> http://github.com/freenet/fred-staging/network > > i know some of these are obsolete from GSoC but there's still a load from > other > people. if there are things which can/should be merged in, please could you do > it, or as

Re: [freenet-dev] unmerged branches

On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Ximin Luo wrote: > Ximin Luo wrote: >> http://github.com/freenet/fred-staging/network > > i know some of these are obsolete from GSoC but there's still a load from > other > people. if there are things which can/should be merged in, please could you do > it, or as

[freenet-dev] compressing files unnecessarily

On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Florent Daigniere wrote: > * Gregory Maxwell [2009-12-15 18:39:24]: > >> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Florent Daigniere >> wrote: >> > Modern compression algorithms allow FAST decompression. We are talking >> > 10 to 20 times faster here! >> > >> > http://en

Re: [freenet-dev] compressing files unnecessarily

On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Florent Daigniere wrote: > * Gregory Maxwell [2009-12-15 18:39:24]: > >> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Florent Daigniere >> wrote: >> > Modern compression algorithms allow FAST decompression. We are talking >> > 10 to 20 times faster here! >> > >> > http://en

[freenet-dev] On Source Formatting of freenet

g something other than Eclipse, they'll need to persuade it to >> keep the existing formatting. >> >> Ian. >> >> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Daniel Cheng > gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Juiceman, >> > >> > Please *DO NOT* fix the

[freenet-dev] On Source Formatting of freenet

Juiceman, Please *DO NOT* fix the source formatting just for the source formatting. When you do that, you would mess up `git blame`, make it much harder to trace who and why a line/method was introduced. Daniel -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Re: [freenet-dev] On Source Formatting of freenet

g something other than Eclipse, they'll need to persuade it to >> keep the existing formatting. >> >> Ian. >> >> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Daniel Cheng >> > >> wrote: >> > Juiceman, >> > >> > Please *DO NOT* fix the so

[freenet-dev] On Source Formatting of freenet

Juiceman, Please *DO NOT* fix the source formatting just for the source formatting. When you do that, you would mess up `git blame`, make it much harder to trace who and why a line/method was introduced. Daniel ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetprojec

[freenet-dev] Plugin autoupdating question

On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 1:49 AM, Evan Daniel wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:30 PM, xor wrote: >> >> - The autoupdater MUST call plugin.terminate() before unloading the plugin >> because plugins use databases and those must be properly closed. >> >> - Deadlock bugs however might prevent plugins

Re: [freenet-dev] Plugin autoupdating question

On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 1:49 AM, Evan Daniel wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:30 PM, xor wrote: >> >> - The autoupdater MUST call plugin.terminate() before unloading the plugin >> because plugins use databases and those must be properly closed. >> >> - Deadlock bugs however might prevent plugins

[freenet-dev] Guardian writes about Freenet

On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Ximin Luo wrote: > Ian Clarke wrote: >> The Guardian has an article, the product of an interview I did a few >> weeks ago, read it here: >> >> ? http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/nov/26/dark-side-internet-freenet >> >> You can read my public response here:

Re: [freenet-dev] Guardian writes about Freenet

On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Ximin Luo wrote: > Ian Clarke wrote: >> The Guardian has an article, the product of an interview I did a few >> weeks ago, read it here: >> >>   http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/nov/26/dark-side-internet-freenet >> >> You can read my public response here:

[freenet-dev] Where are all the Indians? Download stats by country for the last month

On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > After worrying about a likely slashdotting resulting from a Guardian article, > I had a look at Google Analytics. One thing I found was downloads by country > (over the last month) is rather curious, the top 10: [...] > India > ? ? ? ?

Re: [freenet-dev] Where are all the Indians? Download stats by country for the last month

On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > After worrying about a likely slashdotting resulting from a Guardian article, > I had a look at Google Analytics. One thing I found was downloads by country > (over the last month) is rather curious, the top 10: [...] > India >        

[freenet-dev] BaseManifestPutter change in b9dc154d4ac3556824b1794d4de7aab411c1d30b

On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > Is it always non-null *in all derived classes*? /metas/ is a *local* variable, and it is set to /null/ just one line before the /if/: line 1568: ArrayList metas = null; line 1569: if(metas != null) { > > diff --git a/sr

Re: [freenet-dev] BaseManifestPutter change in b9dc154d4ac3556824b1794d4de7aab411c1d30b

On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > Is it always non-null *in all derived classes*? /metas/ is a *local* variable, and it is set to /null/ just one line before the /if/: line 1568: ArrayList metas = null; line 1569: if(metas != null) { > > diff --git a/sr

[freenet-dev] selecting browser for Launch Freenet from systray

On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Zero3 wrote: > Matthew Toseland wrote: >> On Tuesday 17 November 2009 07:20:03 Zero3 wrote: >>> Matthew Toseland wrote: On Sunday 15 November 2009 01:14:54 Ed Tomlinson wrote: > On Saturday 14 November 2009 16:02:11 Matthew Toseland wrote: >> On Saturd

Re: [freenet-dev] selecting browser for Launch Freenet from systray

On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Zero3 wrote: > Matthew Toseland wrote: >> On Tuesday 17 November 2009 07:20:03 Zero3 wrote: >>> Matthew Toseland wrote: On Sunday 15 November 2009 01:14:54 Ed Tomlinson wrote: > On Saturday 14 November 2009 16:02:11 Matthew Toseland wrote: >> On Saturd

[freenet-dev] Some feedback from a hostile environment

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Evan Daniel wrote: > On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Matthew Toseland > wrote: >> Some Chinese feedback: Main point is there are a lot of old PCs with very >> limited RAM, although new ones have plenty of RAM. Broadband is however >> reasonable in general, makin

Re: [freenet-dev] Some feedback from a hostile environment

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Evan Daniel wrote: > On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Matthew Toseland > wrote: >> Some Chinese feedback: Main point is there are a lot of old PCs with very >> limited RAM, although new ones have plenty of RAM. Broadband is however >> reasonable in general, makin

[freenet-dev] Progress bars rethink?

On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 2:45 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > I apologise in advance to all those who think that user interfaces are a > nuisance as they get us more users who need support and therefore are a > nuisance. I promise there will be more technical issues soon. :) > > We should reconsider

[freenet-dev] [FYI] Sun Java SE 5.0 EOL today.

Just FYI, Sun J2SE5.0 have just came to EOL today. Sun is still providing updates for "Java SE for Business 1.5" licensees. [ see http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/index_jdk5.jsp ] Regards, SDiZ

[freenet-dev] [FYI] Sun Java SE 5.0 EOL today.

Just FYI, Sun J2SE5.0 have just came to EOL today. Sun is still providing updates for "Java SE for Business 1.5" licensees. [ see http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/index_jdk5.jsp ] Regards, SDiZ ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://em

[freenet-dev] it_IT l10n update 091002

On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 5:44 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Friday 02 October 2009 21:24:32 Luke771 wrote: >> Attached. >> Updated to 1236 rbuild01236 >> > Pushed in git 0d646be > you have updated the new-css-filter branch, not the master one

Re: [freenet-dev] it_IT l10n update 091002

On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 5:44 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Friday 02 October 2009 21:24:32 Luke771 wrote: >> Attached. >> Updated to 1236 rbuild01236 >> > Pushed in git 0d646be > you have updated the new-css-filter branch, not the master one ___ Devl

[freenet-dev] BigInteger and NativeBigInteger

On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Daniel Cheng wrote: > On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Ximin Luo wrote: >> I created a new branch (bigint7) which tests the performance of java 7's >> BigInteger implementation. can people please benchmark it? >> > > no significa

[freenet-dev] BigInteger and NativeBigInteger

On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Ximin Luo wrote: > I created a new branch (bigint7) which tests the performance of java 7's > BigInteger implementation. can people please benchmark it? > no significant different are found. AMD Athlon(TM) XP 1800+ Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0

[freenet-dev] BigInteger and NativeBigInteger

On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Ximin Luo wrote: > I created a new branch (bigint7) which tests the performance of java 7's > BigInteger implementation. can people please benchmark it? > BigInteger use java.util.Arrays.copyOfRange and friends, which are java 6 only.

Re: [freenet-dev] BigInteger and NativeBigInteger

On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Daniel Cheng wrote: > On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Ximin Luo wrote: >> I created a new branch (bigint7) which tests the performance of java 7's >> BigInteger implementation. can people please benchmark it? >> > > no significa

Re: [freenet-dev] BigInteger and NativeBigInteger

On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Ximin Luo wrote: > I created a new branch (bigint7) which tests the performance of java 7's > BigInteger implementation. can people please benchmark it? > no significant different are found. AMD Athlon(TM) XP 1800+ Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0

Re: [freenet-dev] BigInteger and NativeBigInteger

On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Ximin Luo wrote: > I created a new branch (bigint7) which tests the performance of java 7's > BigInteger implementation. can people please benchmark it? > BigInteger use java.util.Arrays.copyOfRange and friends, which are java 6 only. _

[freenet-dev] BigInteger and NativeBigInteger

On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Ximin Luo wrote: > I created a new branch (bigint7) which tests the performance of java 7's > BigInteger implementation. can people please benchmark it? > > On latest fred-staging: > > $ git checkout bigint7 > $ ant unit -Dbenchmark=true > > ? ?[junit]

Re: [freenet-dev] BigInteger and NativeBigInteger

On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Ximin Luo wrote: > I created a new branch (bigint7) which tests the performance of java 7's > BigInteger implementation. can people please benchmark it? > > On latest fred-staging: > > $ git checkout bigint7 > $ ant unit -Dbenchmark=true > >    [junit]

[freenet-dev] What is in locations.log.txt?

On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Michael Yip wrote: > Hi guys, > > Can someone explain to me what is logged in the file locations.log.txt? > > Here's my guess. It logs the location changes of my node and this > prevents my node from specializing in storing a subset of the keyspace? Almost, this is

Re: [freenet-dev] What is in locations.log.txt?

On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Michael Yip wrote: > Hi guys, > > Can someone explain to me what is logged in the file locations.log.txt? > > Here's my guess. It logs the location changes of my node and this > prevents my node from specializing in storing a subset of the keyspace? Almost, this is

[freenet-dev] New freenet-ext.jar for testing

On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Ximin Luo wrote: > Juiceman wrote: > > can you give the output of that hs_err log, and also your java version (java > -version) and OS version (uname -a)? the answer is in this section: >> INFO | jvm 1| 2009/08/26 19:54:49 | # JRE version: 6.0_15-b03 >> IN

Re: [freenet-dev] New freenet-ext.jar for testing

On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Ximin Luo wrote: > Juiceman wrote: > > can you give the output of that hs_err log, and also your java version (java > -version) and OS version (uname -a)? the answer is in this section: >> INFO | jvm 1| 2009/08/26 19:54:49 | # JRE version: 6.0_15-b03 >> IN

[freenet-dev] ?spam? Re: AllData reply bug?

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:44 PM, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Matthew > Toseland wrote: >>> It's not a joke but I admit I misunderstood the specification. I was >>> wondering how to detect the end of a AllData reply and I thought there >>> would be something such as "EndMes

Re: [freenet-dev] ?spam? Re: AllData reply bug?

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:44 PM, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Matthew > Toseland wrote: >>> It's not a joke but I admit I misunderstood the specification. I was >>> wondering how to detect the end of a AllData reply and I thought there >>> would be something such as "EndMes

[freenet-dev] Migration to Yet Another Java Service Wrapper? was Re: Win64 support options?

On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 6:22 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Friday 21 August 2009 22:04:07 Masayuki Hatta wrote: >> Hi, >> >> > In <200908212131.09148.toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> >> > Matthew Toseland wrote: >> >> > How common is 64-bit Vista? Currently we install a 32-bit JVM, which >

Re: [freenet-dev] Migration to Yet Another Java Service Wrapper? was Re: Win64 support options?

On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 6:22 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Friday 21 August 2009 22:04:07 Masayuki Hatta wrote: >> Hi, >> >> > In <200908212131.09148.t...@amphibian.dyndns.org> >> > Matthew Toseland wrote: >> >> > How common is 64-bit Vista? Currently we install a 32-bit JVM, which >> >

[freenet-dev] [nore...@freenetproject.org: [Freenet 0001104]: NAT-PMP support]

On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:35 PM, xor wrote: > On Monday 17 August 2009 16:33:53 Daniel Cheng wrote: [...] >> ? 4. some simple typos / ui glitches >> ? ? ? if you have time, fix these, it would be more helpful then >> messing with the bug tracker. >> ? ? ? most of them

[freenet-dev] [nore...@freenetproject.org: [Freenet 0001104]: NAT-PMP support]

On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 9:16 PM, xor wrote: > On Sunday 16 August 2009 22:36:17 NextGen$ wrote: >> * xor [2009-08-16 17:33:15]: >> > On Sunday 16 August 2009 16:38:15 NextGen$ wrote: >> > > Hi,Being another developer who have __tried__ to fix the issue tracker, I think I have to say something here

Re: [freenet-dev] [nore...@freenetproject.org: [Freenet 0001104]: NAT-PMP support]

On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:35 PM, xor wrote: > On Monday 17 August 2009 16:33:53 Daniel Cheng wrote: [...] >>   4. some simple typos / ui glitches >>       if you have time, fix these, it would be more helpful then >> messing with the bug tracker. >>       most of them

Re: [freenet-dev] [nore...@freenetproject.org: [Freenet 0001104]: NAT-PMP support]

On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 9:16 PM, xor wrote: > On Sunday 16 August 2009 22:36:17 NextGen$ wrote: >> * xor [2009-08-16 17:33:15]: >> > On Sunday 16 August 2009 16:38:15 NextGen$ wrote: >> > > Hi,Being another developer who have __tried__ to fix the issue tracker, I think I have to say something here

[freenet-dev] Serious near-practical AES attack, consequences for Freenet

On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 3:38 AM, Evan Daniel wrote: > On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Matthew > Toseland wrote: >> http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/07/another_new_aes.html >> >> Practical related-key/related-subkey attacks on AES with a 256-bit key with >> 9, 10 and 11 rounds. The offici

[freenet-dev] Plugin loading over FCP

On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 2:32 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > commit acd49fa6248d4b2d834a45a67d6564dc26efdadc > Author: saces > Date: ? Wed Jul 22 15:53:58 2009 +0200 > > ? ?add fcp commands to load/update/remove plugins > > run() may take some considerable time, blocking all FCP messages during that

Re: [freenet-dev] Serious near-practical AES attack, consequences for Freenet

On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 3:38 AM, Evan Daniel wrote: > On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Matthew > Toseland wrote: >> http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/07/another_new_aes.html >> >> Practical related-key/related-subkey attacks on AES with a 256-bit key with >> 9, 10 and 11 rounds. The offici

Re: [freenet-dev] Plugin loading over FCP

On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 2:32 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > commit acd49fa6248d4b2d834a45a67d6564dc26efdadc > Author: saces > Date:   Wed Jul 22 15:53:58 2009 +0200 > >    add fcp commands to load/update/remove plugins > > run() may take some considerable time, blocking all FCP messages during that

[freenet-dev] Freereader - a freenet plugin

On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 3:23 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Wednesday 15 July 2009 10:11:01 Mario Volke wrote: >> ?The plugin-Freefreader-staging and ...-official repos are still not >> available. >> ?Could you create them? My github account name is "webholics". > > Sorry ... Imported, and given

[freenet-dev] [plugin-Library] some recent change

work out how to do the API thing and I work out how to > make the search and ui i did earlier work with the new index format. So the classloader is the only major blocker, right? > Thanks for the comments > Mike > > > 2009/7/28 Daniel Cheng : >> Sorry for yet-another

Re: [freenet-dev] Freereader - a freenet plugin

On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 3:23 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Wednesday 15 July 2009 10:11:01 Mario Volke wrote: >>  The plugin-Freefreader-staging and ...-official repos are still not >> available. >>  Could you create them? My github account name is "webholics". > > Sorry ... Imported, and given

Re: [freenet-dev] [plugin-Library] some recent change

work out how to do the API thing and I work out how to > make the search and ui i did earlier work with the new index format. So the classloader is the only major blocker, right? > Thanks for the comments > Mike > > > 2009/7/28 Daniel Cheng : >> Sorry for yet-another

[freenet-dev] SoC status on search features

On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: [..] > Is setting toLowerCase locale to US a good idea? The XMLSpider and XMLLibrarian must use the same locale for lower casing. I guess we can't afford having multiple locale.

[freenet-dev] SoC status on search features

On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Mike Bush wrote: > A progress report on my project. > > My SoC project originally had to do with improvements to XMLLibrarian > and XMLSpider to provide a better search experience to freenet users, > particularly helping with the issue of newcomers to freenet startin

Re: [freenet-dev] SoC status on search features

On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: [..] > Is setting toLowerCase locale to US a good idea? The XMLSpider and XMLLibrarian must use the same locale for lower casing. I guess we can't afford having multiple locale. ___ Devl mailing li

Re: [freenet-dev] SoC status on search features

On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Mike Bush wrote: > A progress report on my project. > > My SoC project originally had to do with improvements to XMLLibrarian > and XMLSpider to provide a better search experience to freenet users, > particularly helping with the issue of newcomers to freenet startin

[freenet-dev] Need definition of fproxy language codes

On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Zero3 wrote: > Reposting: > > bo-le skrev: >> Am Dienstag, 16. Juni 2009 21:40:53 schrieb Zero3: >>> Matthew Toseland skrev: On Sunday 14 June 2009 13:11:40 Zero3 wrote: > Matthew Toseland skrev: > This value is also passed on to the node via "node.l10n=

Re: [freenet-dev] Need definition of fproxy language codes

On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Zero3 wrote: > Reposting: > > bo-le skrev: >> Am Dienstag, 16. Juni 2009 21:40:53 schrieb Zero3: >>> Matthew Toseland skrev: On Sunday 14 June 2009 13:11:40 Zero3 wrote: > Matthew Toseland skrev: > This value is also passed on to the node via "node.l10n=

[freenet-dev] Asynchronous image loading

On 17/6/2009 22:36, sashee wrote: > this way freenet don't start all the > fetching, just what is requested... When the page loads, freenet > start fetching all the images, Did you look at your /config/fproxy page ? There is an option called "Enable prefetching of inline images" .. > Wh

[freenet-dev] Good screenshots needed

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Ian Clarke wrote: > I've been doing quite a bit of work in my day job with people who have > done a vast amount of testing of the effectiveness of different > website designs. > > If I were to condense what I've learned into a single caveman > sentence, it would be

[freenet-dev] The new blue gradient website background

Just a quick notes: Blue Gradient background won't work, because: -- BLUE have low contrast with the black text -- our rabbit logo is blue, even lower contrast -- the website ian suggested ( getfirefox/ jquery) and other well-design webpage does NOT use gradient a

Re: [freenet-dev] Asynchronous image loading

On 17/6/2009 22:36, sashee wrote: > this way freenet don't start all the > fetching, just what is requested... When the page loads, freenet > start fetching all the images, Did you look at your /config/fproxy page ? There is an option called "Enable prefetching of inline images" .. > Wh

Re: [freenet-dev] Good screenshots needed

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Ian Clarke wrote: > I've been doing quite a bit of work in my day job with people who have > done a vast amount of testing of the effectiveness of different > website designs. > > If I were to condense what I've learned into a single caveman > sentence, it would be

[freenet-dev] The new blue gradient website background

Just a quick notes: Blue Gradient background won't work, because: -- BLUE have low contrast with the black text -- our rabbit logo is blue, even lower contrast -- the website ian suggested ( getfirefox/ jquery) and other well-design webpage does NOT use gradient a

[freenet-dev] Freenet doesn't work with java 1.6.0.14??? was Fwd: Re: [freenet-support] freenet

On 13/6/2009 22:48, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Saturday 06 June 2009 03:59:33 Daniel Cheng wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Zero3 wrote: >>> Matthew Toseland skrev: >>>> Could it be an install path problem, something specific to Windows maybe? >>

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet doesn't work with java 1.6.0.14??? was Fwd: Re: [freenet-support] freenet

On 13/6/2009 22:48, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Saturday 06 June 2009 03:59:33 Daniel Cheng wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Zero3 wrote: >>> Matthew Toseland skrev: >>>> Could it be an install path problem, something specific to Windows maybe? >>

[freenet-dev] Should the spider ignore common words?

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Mike Bush wrote: > On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 21:25 +0800, Daniel Cheng wrote: >> On 11/6/2009 20:16, Mike Bush wrote: >> > 2009/6/10 Daniel Cheng: >> [...] >> >> >> >> This is yet another reason to split the ?part out.

[freenet-dev] Should the spider ignore common words?

On 11/6/2009 20:16, Mike Bush wrote: > 2009/6/10 Daniel Cheng: [...] >> >> This is yet another reason to split the part out. > > I've built 2 indexes to find the space saving from separating keys > from words as well, > for an index> 16000 keys with 256 sub

Re: [freenet-dev] Should the spider ignore common words?

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Mike Bush wrote: > On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 21:25 +0800, Daniel Cheng wrote: >> On 11/6/2009 20:16, Mike Bush wrote: >> > 2009/6/10 Daniel Cheng: >> [...] >> >> >> >> This is yet another reason to split the  part out.

Re: [freenet-dev] Should the spider ignore common words?

On 11/6/2009 20:16, Mike Bush wrote: > 2009/6/10 Daniel Cheng: [...] >> >> This is yet another reason to split the part out. > > I've built 2 indexes to find the space saving from separating keys > from words as well, > for an index> 16000 keys with 256 sub

[freenet-dev] Should the spider ignore common words?

On 10/6/2009 18:04, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Wednesday 10 June 2009 06:54:03 Daniel Cheng wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Evan Daniel wrote: >>> On my (incomplete) spider index, the index file for the word "the" (it >>> indexes no other wor

[freenet-dev] Should the spider ignore common words?

On 10/6/2009 20:42, Mike Bush wrote: > 2009/6/10 Evan Daniel: >> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 6:49 AM, Mike Bush wrote: >>> XMLLibrarian doesn't currently support searching for phrases or rating >>> relevance of results based on proximity so I don't think common words >>> could be of any use in searche

[freenet-dev] Should the spider ignore common words?

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Evan Daniel wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:49 AM, Daniel Cheng > wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Evan Daniel wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:56 AM, Daniel Cheng >>> wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 a

[freenet-dev] Should the spider ignore common words?

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Evan Daniel wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:56 AM, Daniel Cheng > wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Evan Daniel wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Daniel Cheng >>> wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 a

[freenet-dev] Should the spider ignore common words?

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Evan Daniel wrote: [...] > Of course, a more efficient algorithm for creating the indexes in the > first place would both make it far faster and make the two take > approximately the same time. This is one of the reason(s) why i asked for splitting . -- it make the

[freenet-dev] Should the spider ignore common words?

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Evan Daniel wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Daniel Cheng > wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Evan Daniel wrote: >>> On my (incomplete) spider index, the index file for the word "the" (it >>> indexes no

[freenet-dev] Should the spider ignore common words?

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Evan Daniel wrote: > On my (incomplete) spider index, the index file for the word "the" (it > indexes no other words) is 17MB. ?This seems rather large. ?It might > make sense to have the spider not even bother creating an index on a > handful of very common words

Re: [freenet-dev] Should the spider ignore common words?

On 10/6/2009 18:04, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Wednesday 10 June 2009 06:54:03 Daniel Cheng wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Evan Daniel wrote: >>> On my (incomplete) spider index, the index file for the word "the" (it >>> indexes no other wor

Re: [freenet-dev] Should the spider ignore common words?

On 10/6/2009 20:42, Mike Bush wrote: > 2009/6/10 Evan Daniel: >> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 6:49 AM, Mike Bush wrote: >>> XMLLibrarian doesn't currently support searching for phrases or rating >>> relevance of results based on proximity so I don't think common words >>> could be of any use in searche

Re: [freenet-dev] Should the spider ignore common words?

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Evan Daniel wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:49 AM, Daniel Cheng > wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Evan Daniel wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:56 AM, Daniel Cheng >>> wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 a

Re: [freenet-dev] Should the spider ignore common words?

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Evan Daniel wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:56 AM, Daniel Cheng > wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Evan Daniel wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Daniel Cheng >>> wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 a

Re: [freenet-dev] Should the spider ignore common words?

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Evan Daniel wrote: [...] > Of course, a more efficient algorithm for creating the indexes in the > first place would both make it far faster and make the two take > approximately the same time. This is one of the reason(s) why i asked for splitting . -- it make the

Re: [freenet-dev] Should the spider ignore common words?

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Evan Daniel wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Daniel Cheng > wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Evan Daniel wrote: >>> On my (incomplete) spider index, the index file for the word "the" (it >>> indexes no

Re: [freenet-dev] Should the spider ignore common words?

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Evan Daniel wrote: > On my (incomplete) spider index, the index file for the word "the" (it > indexes no other words) is 17MB.  This seems rather large.  It might > make sense to have the spider not even bother creating an index on a > handful of very common words

[freenet-dev] Auto restart on Mac

On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 1:19 AM, Mel Charters wrote: > Auto restart of Freenet when I reboot the system does not work on my > Mac. Console log is as follows. > > Starting Freenet 0.7... > launchd[207]: com.freenet.startup.plist: respawning too quickly! throttling > launchd[207]: com.freenet.startup.

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >