[freenet-dev] Unhosted web apps over Freenet: Restricted API for WoT-based Javascript was Re: [unhosted] Unhosted and Freenet Project

2011-03-10 Thread Michiel de Jong
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > On Monday 14 February 2011 09:08:28 Michiel de Jong wrote: > > I may remember this incorrectly, but I think when I tried out freenet, > it's > > a desktop application, and not a localhost http service,

Re: [freenet-dev] Unhosted web apps over Freenet: Restricted API for WoT-based Javascript was Re: [unhosted] Unhosted and Freenet Project

2011-03-10 Thread Michiel de Jong
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide arne_...@web.dewrote: On Monday 14 February 2011 09:08:28 Michiel de Jong wrote: I may remember this incorrectly, but I think when I tried out freenet, it's a desktop application, and not a localhost http service, right? Freenet

[freenet-dev] Unhosted web apps over Freenet: Restricted API for WoT-based Javascript was Re: [unhosted] Unhosted and Freenet Project

2011-03-01 Thread Michiel de Jong
Hi Matthew, Sorry to take so long to reply, it's been a bit hectic for me these days. On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > Okay, we've clearly gone off in different directions. > > not necessarily, i think i just didn't fully understand what you were proposing, which made

Re: [freenet-dev] Unhosted web apps over Freenet: Restricted API for WoT-based Javascript was Re: [unhosted] Unhosted and Freenet Project

2011-03-01 Thread Michiel de Jong
Hi Matthew, Sorry to take so long to reply, it's been a bit hectic for me these days. On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: Okay, we've clearly gone off in different directions. not necessarily, i think i just didn't fully understand what you

[freenet-dev] The Freedom Box

2011-02-22 Thread Michiel de Jong
OK, so that's a starting point then! :) I informally proposed the inclusion of freenet into freedombox during this Sunday's FreedomBox Hackfest, but I didn't know my stuff well enough to defend why freenet should be included if Tor is already going on there pretty much for sure it seems. IMHO, it

Re: [freenet-dev] The Freedom Box

2011-02-22 Thread Michiel de Jong
OK, so that's a starting point then! :) I informally proposed the inclusion of freenet into freedombox during this Sunday's FreedomBox Hackfest, but I didn't know my stuff well enough to defend why freenet should be included if Tor is already going on there pretty much for sure it seems. IMHO, it

[freenet-dev] The Freedom Box

2011-02-17 Thread Michiel de Jong
any, is there any? If not, then that would be what needs doing. Is there anyone who would be able to package freenet for debian? Cheers, Michiel de Jong --- Unhosted.org On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Daniel Kanaan wrote: > Fantastic concept. It seems silly when people have big PC's with

Re: [freenet-dev] The Freedom Box

2011-02-17 Thread Michiel de Jong
any, is there any? If not, then that would be what needs doing. Is there anyone who would be able to package freenet for debian? Cheers, Michiel de Jong --- Unhosted.org On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Daniel Kanaan da...@kanaan.org.uk wrote: Fantastic concept. It seems silly when people have

[freenet-dev] Unhosted web apps over Freenet: Restricted API for WoT-based Javascript was Re: [unhosted] Unhosted and Freenet Project

2011-02-14 Thread Michiel de Jong
I thought about this some more, and I think it doesn't make sense to distribute applications over freenet. Rather I think the JavaScript application should be like a viewer application, and the unhosted storage node could do freenet-node/server task of keeping data alive and anonymizing requests.

Re: [freenet-dev] Unhosted web apps over Freenet: Restricted API for WoT-based Javascript was Re: [unhosted] Unhosted and Freenet Project

2011-02-14 Thread Michiel de Jong
I thought about this some more, and I think it doesn't make sense to distribute applications over freenet. Rather I think the JavaScript application should be like a viewer application, and the unhosted storage node could do freenet-node/server task of keeping data alive and anonymizing requests.

[freenet-dev] Unhosted web apps over Freenet: Restricted API for WoT-based Javascript was Re: [unhosted] Unhosted and Freenet Project

2011-02-13 Thread Michiel de Jong
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > I wonder if we could build a usable sandbox based on Unhosted principles, > i.e. an app can download and upload data specific to its user, and can talk > to other users. We could even provide a confirmation mechanism per-user for > more

Re: [freenet-dev] Unhosted web apps over Freenet: Restricted API for WoT-based Javascript was Re: [unhosted] Unhosted and Freenet Project

2011-02-13 Thread Michiel de Jong
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: I wonder if we could build a usable sandbox based on Unhosted principles, i.e. an app can download and upload data specific to its user, and can talk to other users. We could even provide a confirmation

[freenet-dev] [unhosted] Unhosted and Freenet Project

2011-01-14 Thread Michiel de Jong
Hi! My name is Michiel, I originally founded Unhosted, about three months ago. One important thing for you to understand about Unhosted is that there is hardly any code (yet), and although there are a few proof-of-concept applications that use unhosted technology, these are not real-world / live

Re: [freenet-dev] [unhosted] Unhosted and Freenet Project

2011-01-14 Thread Michiel de Jong
Hi! My name is Michiel, I originally founded Unhosted, about three months ago. One important thing for you to understand about Unhosted is that there is hardly any code (yet), and although there are a few proof-of-concept applications that use unhosted technology, these are not real-world / live