Re: [freenet-dev] Re: 6276 is up... upgrade and insert your index

2003-10-25 Thread Dave Hooper
[EMAIL PROTECTED],flaghATTIcmo6j3ic7qohg/[EMAIL PROTECTED] sH9HWFrYxIGEw0PAgM/DFI// Woo, just got it. How does the spider work and how does it pick up new sites? [EMAIL PROTECTED],yuCNX5UUQUgbRNv3Ire46w/BigAnimalHead// Should be available on the unstable network now d

Re: [freenet-dev] Re: 6276 is up... upgrade and insert your index

2003-10-25 Thread Conrad J. Sabatier
On Sat, Oct 25, 2003 at 11:44:21AM +0100, Dave Hooper wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED],flaghATTIcmo6j3ic7qohg/[EMAIL PROTECTED] sH9HWFrYxIGEw0PAgM/DFI// Woo, just got it. How does the spider work and how does it pick up new sites? [EMAIL PROTECTED],yuCNX5UUQUgbRNv3Ire46w/BigAnimalHead//

Re: [freenet-dev] Re: 6276 is up... upgrade and insert your index

2003-10-25 Thread Edward J. Huff
On Sat, 2003-10-25 at 07:46, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: Darn it. I was in the middle of composing a reply to this when the power blinked for a second here, and now I don't have time to redo it, since I have to get ready for work (yeah, on a *Saturday*, yuck). :-) You _really_ need a UPS.

Re: [freenet-dev] Re: 6276 is up... upgrade and insert your index

2003-10-25 Thread Conrad J. Sabatier
On Sat, Oct 25, 2003 at 04:32:45PM -0400, Edward J. Huff wrote: On Sat, 2003-10-25 at 07:46, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: Darn it. I was in the middle of composing a reply to this when the power blinked for a second here, and now I don't have time to redo it, since I have to get ready for

Re: [freenet-dev] Re: 6276 is up... upgrade and insert your index

2003-10-25 Thread Conrad J. Sabatier
On Sat, Oct 25, 2003 at 11:44:21AM +0100, Dave Hooper wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED],flaghATTIcmo6j3ic7qohg/[EMAIL PROTECTED] sH9HWFrYxIGEw0PAgM/DFI// Woo, just got it. How does the spider work and how does it pick up new sites? It's pretty simple, really, both in theory and in practice.

[freenet-dev] Re: 6276 is up... upgrade and insert your index

2003-10-24 Thread Conrad J. Sabatier
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 08:02:50PM -0700, Martin Stone Davis wrote: can't wait to check it out -Martin Done. :-) Let me know if you're able to retrieve it or not. -- Conrad Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] - In Unix veritas ___ Devl mailing list

[freenet-dev] Re: 6276 is up... upgrade and insert your index

2003-10-24 Thread Martin Stone Davis
Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 08:02:50PM -0700, Martin Stone Davis wrote: can't wait to check it out -Martin Done. :-) Let me know if you're able to retrieve it or not. I got it hours ago, actually. Site's not too shabby! Well, a little shabby ;) Added it to my

Re: [freenet-dev] Re: 6276 is up... upgrade and insert your index

2003-10-24 Thread Conrad J. Sabatier
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 03:51:58AM -0700, Martin Stone Davis wrote: Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 08:02:50PM -0700, Martin Stone Davis wrote: can't wait to check it out -Martin Done. :-) Let me know if you're able to retrieve it or not. I got it hours ago,

Re: [freenet-dev] Re: 6276 is up... upgrade and insert your index

2003-10-24 Thread freenet-dev
Yes, I'm still not sure why it ends up with all the CHECKED_HTTP stuff, as the original files contain just straight http://127.0.0.1: links. Ah... you shouldn't do this! If linking to in-freenet content, you should just link like: a href=[EMAIL PROTECTED]/a rather than include the

Re: [freenet-dev] Re: 6276 is up... upgrade and insert your index

2003-10-24 Thread fish
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 01:27:06PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, I'm still not sure why it ends up with all the CHECKED_HTTP stuff, as the original files contain just straight http://127.0.0.1: links. Ah... you shouldn't do this! If linking to in-freenet content, you should

Re: [freenet-dev] Re: 6276 is up... upgrade and insert your index

2003-10-24 Thread Conrad J. Sabatier
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 01:27:06PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, I'm still not sure why it ends up with all the CHECKED_HTTP stuff, as the original files contain just straight http://127.0.0.1: links. Ah... you shouldn't do this! If linking to in-freenet content, you should